The Enhancement of Cultural Literacy of Young People: Engagement of Heritage Sites

Anita Stašulāne
{"title":"The Enhancement of Cultural Literacy of Young People: Engagement of Heritage Sites","authors":"Anita Stašulāne","doi":"10.33422/3rd.iachss.2019.08.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the mapping undertaken in the EU Horizon 2020 Programme research project “Cultural Heritage and Identities of Europe’s Future” (CHIEF, Agreement No. 770464), the National History Museum of Latvia in Riga and the Mark Rothko Art Centre in Daugavpils were selected to compare how the cultural heritage is represented and offered to young people in the mainstream heritage site and in the alternative heritage site. The proposed presentation will outline the results of fieldwork carried out from (February 1 March 30, 2019) in the selected heritage sites. The data obtained from the semi-structured in-depth expert interviews made it possible to discuss: (1) the implementation of the cultural heritage policy in heritage sites; (2) understanding of the concepts “culture”, “national cultural heritage”, “regional cultural heritage”, “European cultural heritage”; (3) the contribution of cultural heritage sites to the enhancement of young people’s cultural literacy. The selection of the heritage sites provided by the strategy of the CHIEF project, i.e. to focus on the mainstream and alternative heritage sites simultaneously for the purpose of exploring the offer for young people’s cultural education, has proved its worth since the comparison shows the common and different aspects, advantages and problems/drawbacks in the operation of both institutions.","PeriodicalId":222531,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 3rd International Academic Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 3rd International Academic Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.iachss.2019.08.470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the mapping undertaken in the EU Horizon 2020 Programme research project “Cultural Heritage and Identities of Europe’s Future” (CHIEF, Agreement No. 770464), the National History Museum of Latvia in Riga and the Mark Rothko Art Centre in Daugavpils were selected to compare how the cultural heritage is represented and offered to young people in the mainstream heritage site and in the alternative heritage site. The proposed presentation will outline the results of fieldwork carried out from (February 1 March 30, 2019) in the selected heritage sites. The data obtained from the semi-structured in-depth expert interviews made it possible to discuss: (1) the implementation of the cultural heritage policy in heritage sites; (2) understanding of the concepts “culture”, “national cultural heritage”, “regional cultural heritage”, “European cultural heritage”; (3) the contribution of cultural heritage sites to the enhancement of young people’s cultural literacy. The selection of the heritage sites provided by the strategy of the CHIEF project, i.e. to focus on the mainstream and alternative heritage sites simultaneously for the purpose of exploring the offer for young people’s cultural education, has proved its worth since the comparison shows the common and different aspects, advantages and problems/drawbacks in the operation of both institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高青少年的文化素养:文物遗址的参与
根据欧盟地平线2020计划研究项目“文化遗产和欧洲未来的身份”(CHIEF,第770464号协议)所进行的测绘,我们选择了里加的拉脱维亚国家历史博物馆和道格夫匹尔斯的马克·罗斯科艺术中心,比较文化遗产在主流遗产地和另类遗产地的表现和提供给年轻人的方式。建议的报告将概述从2019年2月1日至3月30日在选定的遗产地进行的实地调查结果。通过半结构化的深度专家访谈获得的数据,可以讨论:(1)文化遗产政策在遗产地的实施;(2)对“文化”、“民族文化遗产”、“地域文化遗产”、“欧洲文化遗产”等概念的理解;(3)文化遗产地对提高青少年文化素养的贡献。“CHIEF”计划的策略,即同时关注主流和另类的文物地点,以探讨对青少年文化教育的建议,其所提供的文物地点的选择证明了其价值,因为比较显示了两个机构在运作方面的共同点和不同之处,优势和问题/缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Menstruation: A biological phenomenon and NOT a social stigma, Period Bremen mission’s heritage in Amedzofe The Relationship between the Dramatic Script and the Performance; Centered around the Performer’s Body The importance and position of ethics in social life according to the Islamic doctrines Democratization of China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1