Unskilled and Unaware: Subpar Users of Automated Driving Systems Make Spurious Decisions

Yannick Forster, Sebastian Hergeth, Frederik Naujoks, J. Krems
{"title":"Unskilled and Unaware: Subpar Users of Automated Driving Systems Make Spurious Decisions","authors":"Yannick Forster, Sebastian Hergeth, Frederik Naujoks, J. Krems","doi":"10.1145/3239092.3265960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work investigated differences between preference and performance in Human Computer Interactions and their dependency to the respective user skill level. A driving simulator study with N=57 participants was conducted to evaluate a Human-Machine Interface for a Level 3 Automated Driving System. Two experimenters rated interaction performance (e.g., input errors, mode confusions, etc.). Additionally, participants reported their preference by means of perceived usability and acceptance. The sample was split into four groups based on the quartiles of performance. Results revealed that the four groups differed significantly in their performance. However, preference ratings did not show this effect. Thus, the present research could find evidence that the dissociation of performance and preference depends on participants' skills. Finally, future research directions are outlined.","PeriodicalId":313474,"journal":{"name":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3239092.3265960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This work investigated differences between preference and performance in Human Computer Interactions and their dependency to the respective user skill level. A driving simulator study with N=57 participants was conducted to evaluate a Human-Machine Interface for a Level 3 Automated Driving System. Two experimenters rated interaction performance (e.g., input errors, mode confusions, etc.). Additionally, participants reported their preference by means of perceived usability and acceptance. The sample was split into four groups based on the quartiles of performance. Results revealed that the four groups differed significantly in their performance. However, preference ratings did not show this effect. Thus, the present research could find evidence that the dissociation of performance and preference depends on participants' skills. Finally, future research directions are outlined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不熟练和不知情:低水平的自动驾驶系统用户做出错误的决定
本研究调查了人机交互的偏好和表现之间的差异,以及它们对各自用户技能水平的依赖。一项有N=57名参与者的驾驶模拟器研究进行了评估3级自动驾驶系统的人机界面。两名实验者评估交互性能(例如,输入错误,模式混淆等)。此外,参与者通过感知可用性和接受度来报告他们的偏好。样本根据表现的四分位数分为四组。结果显示,四组的表现有显著差异。然而,偏好评级并没有显示出这种影响。因此,本研究可以找到证据表明,表现和偏好的分离取决于参与者的技能。最后,展望了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Demonstration of a low-cost hyper-realistic testbed for designing future onboard experiences Automotive Research in the Public Space: Towards Deployment-Based Prototypes For Real Users Man vs. Machine: A Documentary About Automated Driving In 2018 Somewhere In Bavaria personalDash: First Steps Towards User-controlled Personalization of 3D Dashboards with Mobile Devices Biometric Interface for Driver's Stress Detection and Awareness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1