Dread, Foolishness, Wisdom

D. Schlarb
{"title":"Dread, Foolishness, Wisdom","authors":"D. Schlarb","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197585566.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores Melville’s commentary on the collection of aphorisms known as the book of Proverbs and how he responds to its central propositions: fear of God as a prerequisite for attaining wisdom, the dichotomy between wisdom and folly, and the antinomian problem of God as the author of evil. Proverbs, it argues, enables Melville to frame his contemplation of theology and skepticism by confronting evil in its numerous guises as ontological fact. Because proverbs are portable and pragmatic, they allow Melville to comment politically on contemporary American reality (faith, economics, political and cultural institutions). The chapter discusses Mardi, “The Lightning-Rod Man,” The Confidence-Man, and Billy Budd, showing how proverbs initially connote revolutionary political potential in Melville’s work but soon are rendered ineffectual and used only to indict American political, economic, and cultural industries for successfully conspiring to purge wisdom from all personal interaction and jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":403727,"journal":{"name":"Melville's Wisdom","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melville's Wisdom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197585566.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores Melville’s commentary on the collection of aphorisms known as the book of Proverbs and how he responds to its central propositions: fear of God as a prerequisite for attaining wisdom, the dichotomy between wisdom and folly, and the antinomian problem of God as the author of evil. Proverbs, it argues, enables Melville to frame his contemplation of theology and skepticism by confronting evil in its numerous guises as ontological fact. Because proverbs are portable and pragmatic, they allow Melville to comment politically on contemporary American reality (faith, economics, political and cultural institutions). The chapter discusses Mardi, “The Lightning-Rod Man,” The Confidence-Man, and Billy Budd, showing how proverbs initially connote revolutionary political potential in Melville’s work but soon are rendered ineffectual and used only to indict American political, economic, and cultural industries for successfully conspiring to purge wisdom from all personal interaction and jurisprudence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恐惧,愚蠢,智慧
这一章探讨了梅尔维尔对《箴言》警句集的评论,以及他如何回应其中的中心命题:敬畏上帝是获得智慧的先决条件,智慧与愚蠢的二分法,以及上帝是邪恶的创造者的反律法问题。它认为,《箴言》使梅尔维尔能够把他对神学和怀疑论的思考框架起来,把各种各样伪装成本体论事实的邪恶面对起来。由于谚语便于携带和实用,它们使梅尔维尔能够从政治上评论当代美国的现实(信仰、经济、政治和文化制度)。这一章讨论了马尔迪、“避雷针人”、“信心人”和比利·巴德,展示了谚语在梅尔维尔的作品中最初是如何蕴涵着革命的政治潜力的,但很快就变得无效了,只被用来控诉美国的政治、经济和文化产业,因为它们成功地共谋了从所有个人互动和法理中清除智慧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Moderation, Self-Reflection, Evil Divine Justice and Sublime Suffering Dread, Foolishness, Wisdom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1