{"title":"Accuracy of Feature Extraction Approaches in the Task of Recognition and Classification of Isolated Words in Speech","authors":"A. Messerle, Yu.N. Gorshkov","doi":"10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the practical comparing of feature extraction methods in speech by the example of isolated words (commands) recognition and comparing the performance of a set of features using different classification algorithms. In this case, a consistently increasing set of keyword samples is used for the training set. Approaches based on cepstral coefficient extraction (including MFCC- and GFCC-based variations), linear prediction (LPCC), and wavelet transform (via Basilar-membrane Frequency-band) are considered. The obtained results indicate that in some cases (including recognition tasks) the use of features other than MFCC allows to increase the accuracy of recognition from 1 to 7 percent. At the same time, the statements of the authors of other approaches to the extraction of speech features about the significant superiority of their methods over MFCC are not confirmed.","PeriodicalId":356187,"journal":{"name":"2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 5th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE57272.2023.10086720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper presents the practical comparing of feature extraction methods in speech by the example of isolated words (commands) recognition and comparing the performance of a set of features using different classification algorithms. In this case, a consistently increasing set of keyword samples is used for the training set. Approaches based on cepstral coefficient extraction (including MFCC- and GFCC-based variations), linear prediction (LPCC), and wavelet transform (via Basilar-membrane Frequency-band) are considered. The obtained results indicate that in some cases (including recognition tasks) the use of features other than MFCC allows to increase the accuracy of recognition from 1 to 7 percent. At the same time, the statements of the authors of other approaches to the extraction of speech features about the significant superiority of their methods over MFCC are not confirmed.