{"title":"Two Problems with Shoemaker’s Regress and How to Deal with Them","authors":"Maik Niemeck","doi":"10.17454/pam-2209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With his now famous regress argument, Sydney Shoemaker (1968) aimed to provide justification for the assumption that at least some cases of self-awareness cannot be based on identification. The overall goal of this paper is to discuss two possible worries one may have about Shoemaker’s argument. I will show that these problems have far-reaching consequences that may diminish the argument’s importance for an adequate theory of self-awareness and that another conclusion Shoemaker and other philosophers draw may be unwarranted.","PeriodicalId":404019,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology & Mind","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology & Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With his now famous regress argument, Sydney Shoemaker (1968) aimed to provide justification for the assumption that at least some cases of self-awareness cannot be based on identification. The overall goal of this paper is to discuss two possible worries one may have about Shoemaker’s argument. I will show that these problems have far-reaching consequences that may diminish the argument’s importance for an adequate theory of self-awareness and that another conclusion Shoemaker and other philosophers draw may be unwarranted.
Sydney Shoemaker(1968)提出了著名的回归论证,旨在为以下假设提供理由:至少在某些情况下,自我意识不能基于认同。本文的总体目标是讨论人们对舒梅克的论点可能产生的两种担忧。我将证明,这些问题具有深远的影响,可能会削弱这一论点对于一个充分的自我意识理论的重要性,而且休梅克和其他哲学家得出的另一个结论可能是没有根据的。