{"title":"Parenthood","authors":"Anna Strhan","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198789611.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 focuses on contemporary ideals and practices of ‘parenting’ by examining the normative constructions of parenthood articulated at parenting classes run by St John’s (conservative evangelical) and St George’s (charismatic evangelical), in which the parent–child relationship and its relationship with wider social norms was in question. The chapter explores how leaders at St John’s situated their ideals of children’s obedience to the father and understanding of children as inherently sinful as countercultural and outlines the techniques of parenting that were encouraged here. It then describes how, in contrast, ideas about parenting at St George’s drew on psychoanalytic literature and encouraged parents to learn from secular expertise on parenting, and it considers how these differing ways of understanding what it is to be a parent are shaped by processes of individualization, and open onto wider questions about the agency of the child, human agency, and the social and existential order.","PeriodicalId":276763,"journal":{"name":"The Figure of the Child in Contemporary Evangelicalism","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Figure of the Child in Contemporary Evangelicalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198789611.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Chapter 3 focuses on contemporary ideals and practices of ‘parenting’ by examining the normative constructions of parenthood articulated at parenting classes run by St John’s (conservative evangelical) and St George’s (charismatic evangelical), in which the parent–child relationship and its relationship with wider social norms was in question. The chapter explores how leaders at St John’s situated their ideals of children’s obedience to the father and understanding of children as inherently sinful as countercultural and outlines the techniques of parenting that were encouraged here. It then describes how, in contrast, ideas about parenting at St George’s drew on psychoanalytic literature and encouraged parents to learn from secular expertise on parenting, and it considers how these differing ways of understanding what it is to be a parent are shaped by processes of individualization, and open onto wider questions about the agency of the child, human agency, and the social and existential order.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为人父母
第3章通过检查圣约翰(保守福音派)和圣乔治(魅力福音派)开办的育儿课上阐述的父母的规范结构,重点关注当代“养育”的理想和实践,其中亲子关系及其与更广泛的社会规范的关系受到质疑。这一章探讨了圣约翰的领袖们是如何将他们的理想定位为孩子对父亲的服从,并将孩子理解为天生有罪的反主流文化,并概述了这里鼓励的育儿技巧。然后,它描述了与此相反,圣乔治学校的育儿理念是如何借鉴精神分析文献,并鼓励父母从世俗的育儿专业知识中学习的,它还考虑了这些理解父母是什么不同的方式是如何被个性化的过程所塑造的,并打开了关于儿童代理、人类代理、社会和存在秩序等更广泛的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living with Mess Marking Times and Transitions Parenthood Conclusion Learning a Form of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1