Public Accountability: Understanding Sentiments towards Artificial Intelligence across Dispositional Identities

Brianna Richardson, Diandra Prioleau, Kiana Alikhademi, J. Gilbert
{"title":"Public Accountability: Understanding Sentiments towards Artificial Intelligence across Dispositional Identities","authors":"Brianna Richardson, Diandra Prioleau, Kiana Alikhademi, J. Gilbert","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (Al) and Machine Learning (ML) have been influential across many industries. Companies, nearly every day, are finding new means and methods of benefiting from these technologies. Despite this prevalence, individuals still report a significant level of distrust towards Al and its applications. To rehabilitate the relationship between Al and its consumers, developers must expose these new technologies to consumers and include them in the process of critiquing and assisting in the improvement of such technologies. The goal of this work is to introduce a new initiative towards an Ethical Al society. Participants are given the opportunity to learn about modem applications of Al and the space to reflect on these technologies. It is found that across the exampled technologies, differences of opinions are significantly correlated to specific dispositional identities, such as gender and computing experience. Furthermore, trends of trust across the general public are compared to that of students enrolled in a computer science course. These results depict vastly differing opinions across technologies which validate the need for public exposure and critique. This work highlights the need for researchers and developers to investigate opinions across dispositional identities, including race, gender, socioeconomic status, etc. The study has shown to be beneficial, with over 70% of individuals reporting having learned about a new application of Al.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (Al) and Machine Learning (ML) have been influential across many industries. Companies, nearly every day, are finding new means and methods of benefiting from these technologies. Despite this prevalence, individuals still report a significant level of distrust towards Al and its applications. To rehabilitate the relationship between Al and its consumers, developers must expose these new technologies to consumers and include them in the process of critiquing and assisting in the improvement of such technologies. The goal of this work is to introduce a new initiative towards an Ethical Al society. Participants are given the opportunity to learn about modem applications of Al and the space to reflect on these technologies. It is found that across the exampled technologies, differences of opinions are significantly correlated to specific dispositional identities, such as gender and computing experience. Furthermore, trends of trust across the general public are compared to that of students enrolled in a computer science course. These results depict vastly differing opinions across technologies which validate the need for public exposure and critique. This work highlights the need for researchers and developers to investigate opinions across dispositional identities, including race, gender, socioeconomic status, etc. The study has shown to be beneficial, with over 70% of individuals reporting having learned about a new application of Al.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共责任:理解跨性格认同对人工智能的情感
人工智能(Al)和机器学习(ML)已经在许多行业产生了影响。公司几乎每天都在寻找从这些技术中获益的新手段和新方法。尽管如此,个人仍然报告了对人工智能及其应用的严重不信任。为了恢复人工智能与其消费者之间的关系,开发人员必须将这些新技术暴露给消费者,并将他们包括在批评和帮助改进这些技术的过程中。这项工作的目标是向伦理人工智能社会引入一项新的倡议。参与者有机会了解人工智能的现代应用,并有空间反思这些技术。研究发现,在所有示例技术中,意见差异与特定的性格特征(如性别和计算机经验)显著相关。此外,将普通大众的信任趋势与参加计算机科学课程的学生的信任趋势进行比较。这些结果描述了不同技术之间的巨大分歧,证实了公开曝光和批评的必要性。这项工作强调了研究人员和开发人员需要调查不同性格认同的观点,包括种族、性别、社会经济地位等。这项研究已被证明是有益的,超过70%的人报告说他们了解了人工智能的新应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Historical and Ideological Chasm between Engineering and Development Sustainability means inclusivity: engaging citizens in early stage smart city development Taiwan’s Ability to Reduce the Transmission of COVID-19: A Success Story Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics Using Open Source Licensing to Regulate the Assembly of LAWS: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1