{"title":"Gendered Nationalism, Neo-Nomadism, and Ethnic-Based Exclusivity in Kyrgyz, Kazakh and Uzbek Nationalist Discourses","authors":"Fabio Belafatti","doi":"10.23993/STORE.69958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing literature on gender and nationalism has postulated that nationalist narratives tend to convey patriarchal and restrictive views of gender roles, with women’s domesticity and subordination at the core of such interpretations. This paper tests this theory by looking at three examples of state-sponsored or state-produced communication in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, arguing that the simple existence of a regime’s nationalist ideological orientation is not per se sufficient to explain or anticipate the kind of gender narratives a regime will adopt. Instead, the paper calls for an analysis of internal political mechanisms and incentives in order to explain and anticipate the specific forms that discourses around gender will take in a given political environment. In order to do so, it tries to combine the rational choice-based “Selectorate Theory” (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003) with existing literature on nationalism and gender, to define a connection between political systems on the one hand and discourses on the other.","PeriodicalId":178307,"journal":{"name":"Studia Orientalia Electronica","volume":"395 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Orientalia Electronica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23993/STORE.69958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Existing literature on gender and nationalism has postulated that nationalist narratives tend to convey patriarchal and restrictive views of gender roles, with women’s domesticity and subordination at the core of such interpretations. This paper tests this theory by looking at three examples of state-sponsored or state-produced communication in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, arguing that the simple existence of a regime’s nationalist ideological orientation is not per se sufficient to explain or anticipate the kind of gender narratives a regime will adopt. Instead, the paper calls for an analysis of internal political mechanisms and incentives in order to explain and anticipate the specific forms that discourses around gender will take in a given political environment. In order to do so, it tries to combine the rational choice-based “Selectorate Theory” (Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003) with existing literature on nationalism and gender, to define a connection between political systems on the one hand and discourses on the other.
现有关于性别与民族主义的文献假设,民族主义叙事倾向于传达男权和限制性的性别角色观点,女性的家庭生活和从属地位是这种解释的核心。本文通过观察哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦和乌兹别克斯坦三个国家支持或制造的传播案例来检验这一理论,认为一个政权的民族主义意识形态取向的简单存在本身并不足以解释或预测一个政权将采用的性别叙事类型。相反,本文呼吁对内部政治机制和激励进行分析,以便解释和预测在特定政治环境中围绕性别的话语将采取的具体形式。为了做到这一点,它试图将基于理性选择的“选择理论”(Bueno de Mesquita et al., 2003)与现有的关于民族主义和性别的文献结合起来,以定义一方面政治制度与另一方面话语之间的联系。