Reading Early New Testament Manuscripts

John J Heilmann
{"title":"Reading Early New Testament Manuscripts","authors":"John J Heilmann","doi":"10.1515/9783110639247-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his recent publication on the production and transmission of early Christian gospels,1 Scott D. Charlesworth works out criteria to distinguish early Christian manuscripts that have been produced/copied in controlled settings for “public” use from those that have been copied in uncontrolled settings for “private” usage. Charlesworth defines the category “public manuscripts” as “intentionally produced to be read aloud by lectors in Christian meetings.”2 As the main indicators for identifying public manuscripts, he points to “sense breaks,” “punctuation,” and “lectional signs,” which would “greatly assist the task of the lector (ἀναγνώστης)” of “rightly dividing the continuous lines of letters in ancient texts (scriptio continua)”3 during ancient Christian worship.4 The term “sense break” refers to the paragraphos, a horizontal stroke found in the margins of ancient manuscripts. According to W. A. Johnson, on whom Charlesworth relies here, in papyri with literary texts, the paragraphos “was added primarily to assist with reading aloud—the typical way in which these literary texts would have been used.”5 Under the term “lectional signs”, Charlesworth includes markings on the level of letters and words, i. e. diacritics such as the trema, breathings and accents, as well as the apostrophe. In contrast, he suggests that the absence of these “reader’s aids” in early manuscripts of New Testament texts indicates a private setting “where MSS were read by individuals or where ‘private’ readings for family or friends were conducted, there was more leisurely interaction with the text and the need for reader’s aids was less pressing.”6 There is a fundamental methodological problem with Charlesworth’s approach: the fragmentary state of most of the papyri he examines does not allow for any definite conclusion about the absence of (in his terminology) “reader’s aids,” especially diacritics. Even more problematic, in my view, is that he assumes the presence of an official early Christian worship with a communal reading or even a liturgy of the word. However, the question of the broader social context of early Christian worship is not","PeriodicalId":414761,"journal":{"name":"Material Aspects of Reading in Ancient and Medieval Cultures","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Material Aspects of Reading in Ancient and Medieval Cultures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110639247-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his recent publication on the production and transmission of early Christian gospels,1 Scott D. Charlesworth works out criteria to distinguish early Christian manuscripts that have been produced/copied in controlled settings for “public” use from those that have been copied in uncontrolled settings for “private” usage. Charlesworth defines the category “public manuscripts” as “intentionally produced to be read aloud by lectors in Christian meetings.”2 As the main indicators for identifying public manuscripts, he points to “sense breaks,” “punctuation,” and “lectional signs,” which would “greatly assist the task of the lector (ἀναγνώστης)” of “rightly dividing the continuous lines of letters in ancient texts (scriptio continua)”3 during ancient Christian worship.4 The term “sense break” refers to the paragraphos, a horizontal stroke found in the margins of ancient manuscripts. According to W. A. Johnson, on whom Charlesworth relies here, in papyri with literary texts, the paragraphos “was added primarily to assist with reading aloud—the typical way in which these literary texts would have been used.”5 Under the term “lectional signs”, Charlesworth includes markings on the level of letters and words, i. e. diacritics such as the trema, breathings and accents, as well as the apostrophe. In contrast, he suggests that the absence of these “reader’s aids” in early manuscripts of New Testament texts indicates a private setting “where MSS were read by individuals or where ‘private’ readings for family or friends were conducted, there was more leisurely interaction with the text and the need for reader’s aids was less pressing.”6 There is a fundamental methodological problem with Charlesworth’s approach: the fragmentary state of most of the papyri he examines does not allow for any definite conclusion about the absence of (in his terminology) “reader’s aids,” especially diacritics. Even more problematic, in my view, is that he assumes the presence of an official early Christian worship with a communal reading or even a liturgy of the word. However, the question of the broader social context of early Christian worship is not
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读早期新约手稿
在他最近出版的关于早期基督教福音书的制作和传播的出版物中,1 Scott D. Charlesworth提出了区分早期基督教手稿的标准,这些手稿是在受控环境下制作/复制供“公众”使用的,还是在不受控环境下复制供“私人”使用的。查尔斯沃斯将“公开手稿”定义为“故意制作出来供基督徒聚会上的牧师大声朗读”。作为识别公开手稿的主要指标,他指出“断续符号”、“标点符号”和“拣选符号”,这些符号将“极大地帮助诵经者(ά ναγνώστης)”在古代基督教崇拜中“正确地划分古代文本(scriptio continua)中连续的字母行”“断行”指的是段落,在古代手稿的空白处发现的一种水平笔画。根据查尔斯沃斯在这里所引用的w·a·约翰逊的说法,在有文学文本的莎草纸上,段落“主要是为了帮助大声朗读——这是这些文学文本的典型使用方式。”在“选举符号”这个术语下,查尔斯沃思包括了字母和单词层面的标记,即变音符,如颤音、呼吸和重音,以及撇号。相比之下,他认为在新约文本的早期手稿中缺乏这些“读者的辅助”表明了一个私人环境,“MSS是由个人阅读的,或者是为家人或朋友进行的‘私人’阅读,与文本的互动更悠闲,对读者辅助的需求也不那么紧迫。”查尔斯沃斯的研究方法存在一个基本的方法论问题:他所研究的大部分纸莎草纸的残缺状态,无法得出任何关于(用他的术语来说)“读者辅助工具”缺失的明确结论,尤其是变音符号。在我看来,更有问题的是,他假设官方早期基督教崇拜的存在,是一种公共阅读,甚至是一种礼拜仪式。然而,早期基督教崇拜的更广泛的社会背景的问题不是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reading Material Features of Qumran Tefillin and Mezuzot Reading an Opisthograph at Qumran Scribal Habits and Scholarly Texts Reading Early New Testament Manuscripts Frontmatter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1