Jeffry Andhika Putra, Tsabit Rakhman, M. K. Biddinika
{"title":"Selection between AHP and TOPSIS for Academic Information Systems Decision Making Model","authors":"Jeffry Andhika Putra, Tsabit Rakhman, M. K. Biddinika","doi":"10.5220/0009878700860089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One way to develop a system of academic information using applications Free Open Source (FOS) that are circulating. Academic information system developers need to determine the appropriate FOS used to develop academic information system based on the criteria required and reliability of FOS. One way to help decisionmaking can be used MADM models using AHP and TOPSIS. In this study, applying a comparative analysis of the two methods, the method of AHP and TOPSIS with analytical testing calculations used to compare the three-applications FOS Academic Information System, Campus Academic Information System (Siakad), Academic Information Systems Integrated (Sikadu), as well as SISFOKOL to develop academic information systems.","PeriodicalId":135180,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0009878700860089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
One way to develop a system of academic information using applications Free Open Source (FOS) that are circulating. Academic information system developers need to determine the appropriate FOS used to develop academic information system based on the criteria required and reliability of FOS. One way to help decisionmaking can be used MADM models using AHP and TOPSIS. In this study, applying a comparative analysis of the two methods, the method of AHP and TOPSIS with analytical testing calculations used to compare the three-applications FOS Academic Information System, Campus Academic Information System (Siakad), Academic Information Systems Integrated (Sikadu), as well as SISFOKOL to develop academic information systems.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
