Exploring the Nexus Between Organizational Anticipation and Adaptation in Crisis Management

A. Cedergren, H. Hassel
{"title":"Exploring the Nexus Between Organizational Anticipation and Adaptation in Crisis Management","authors":"A. Cedergren, H. Hassel","doi":"10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_619-cd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational anticipation involves the ability to foresee and analyze potential threats and disturbances as a means to minimize the likelihood of hazard occurrence and to reduce the potential impacts. Common methods include Risk and Vulnerability Assessments (RVAs) and contingency planning, where potentially harmful events are identified and analyzed, and where measures to prevent, respond to and recover from these events are suggested. This includes the development of plans and procedures for what actions to take in case calamities, identified in the assessment, occur. While highly important as a strategy to risk reduction, these anticipatory efforts will never be sufficient for eliminating and treating all potential threats, especially in situations characterized by large uncertainties and high complexities. In the last decade, the dangers of black swan events, i.e. surprising events that have not been anticipated, have gained increased attention to illuminate the limits of the anticipatory approach. As a complement, many scholars have therefore highlighted the value of promoting adaptive capacities as a means to perform resiliently and reduce risks in the face of sudden disturbances. Despite clear interconnections, the anticipatory and adaptive perspectives have been studied in partly disparate scientific strands of research. The purpose of this paper is to explore the nexus between these areas to provide ideas on how they can be combined in a proactive crisis management setting. The paper constitutes a continuation of a three-year researcher-practitioner collaboration in the municipality of Malmo, Sweden, where a method for RVA previously has been developed. The method relies strongly on an anticipatory perspective, but the occurrence of Covid-19 has highlighted the need to integrate or complement it with efforts that facilitate adaptative behavior in the face of sudden shocks and disturbances. The paper draws on a literature review of the anticipatory and adaptive perspectives, focusing on how the anticipatory perspective can be complemented with actions that promotes adaptative capacity. Particular emphasis is placed on the applicability of the adaptive approaches identified in the literature for the context of municipal RVA. © ESREL 2021. Published by Research Publishing, Singapore.","PeriodicalId":187633,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-18-2016-8_619-cd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational anticipation involves the ability to foresee and analyze potential threats and disturbances as a means to minimize the likelihood of hazard occurrence and to reduce the potential impacts. Common methods include Risk and Vulnerability Assessments (RVAs) and contingency planning, where potentially harmful events are identified and analyzed, and where measures to prevent, respond to and recover from these events are suggested. This includes the development of plans and procedures for what actions to take in case calamities, identified in the assessment, occur. While highly important as a strategy to risk reduction, these anticipatory efforts will never be sufficient for eliminating and treating all potential threats, especially in situations characterized by large uncertainties and high complexities. In the last decade, the dangers of black swan events, i.e. surprising events that have not been anticipated, have gained increased attention to illuminate the limits of the anticipatory approach. As a complement, many scholars have therefore highlighted the value of promoting adaptive capacities as a means to perform resiliently and reduce risks in the face of sudden disturbances. Despite clear interconnections, the anticipatory and adaptive perspectives have been studied in partly disparate scientific strands of research. The purpose of this paper is to explore the nexus between these areas to provide ideas on how they can be combined in a proactive crisis management setting. The paper constitutes a continuation of a three-year researcher-practitioner collaboration in the municipality of Malmo, Sweden, where a method for RVA previously has been developed. The method relies strongly on an anticipatory perspective, but the occurrence of Covid-19 has highlighted the need to integrate or complement it with efforts that facilitate adaptative behavior in the face of sudden shocks and disturbances. The paper draws on a literature review of the anticipatory and adaptive perspectives, focusing on how the anticipatory perspective can be complemented with actions that promotes adaptative capacity. Particular emphasis is placed on the applicability of the adaptive approaches identified in the literature for the context of municipal RVA. © ESREL 2021. Published by Research Publishing, Singapore.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机管理中组织预期与适应的关系探讨
组织预期包括预测和分析潜在威胁和干扰的能力,作为最小化危险发生的可能性和减少潜在影响的手段。常见的方法包括风险和脆弱性评估(RVAs)和应急计划,其中识别和分析潜在的有害事件,并提出预防、响应和从这些事件中恢复的措施。这包括制定计划和程序,以便在评估中确定的灾难发生时采取什么行动。虽然作为减少风险的一项战略非常重要,但这些预期的努力永远不足以消除和处理所有潜在的威胁,特别是在极不确定和高度复杂的局势中。在过去十年中,黑天鹅事件(即没有预料到的意外事件)的危险得到了越来越多的关注,以阐明预期方法的局限性。因此,作为补充,许多学者强调了提高适应能力的价值,这是一种在面对突发干扰时表现弹性和降低风险的手段。尽管有明确的相互联系,但预期和适应的观点已经在部分不同的科学研究中进行了研究。本文的目的是探讨这些领域之间的联系,为如何在积极的危机管理环境中将它们结合起来提供思路。该论文是在瑞典马尔默市进行的为期三年的研究人员-从业人员合作的延续,在那里以前已经开发了一种RVA方法。这种方法在很大程度上依赖于预测的视角,但2019冠状病毒病的发生突出表明,需要将其与促进面对突然冲击和干扰的适应性行为的努力相结合或补充。本文借鉴了对预期和适应视角的文献综述,重点关注了预期视角如何与促进适应能力的行动相辅相成。特别强调的是在市政RVA的背景下,在文献中确定的适应性方法的适用性。©esrel 2021。新加坡研究出版社出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to Use Prescriptive Maintenance to Construct Robust Master Production Schedules Robust Sensor Fault Detection for Linear Parameter-Varying Systems using Interval Observer Knowledge-Based Approach for System Level Electromagnetic Safety Analysis A State-of-the-Art Review on IC EMC Reliability Empirical Analysis of Ship Anchor Drag Incidents for Cable Burial Risk Assessments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1