Fiscal Federalism and the Stability and Growth Pact: A Difficult Union

Fabrizio Balassone, D. Franco
{"title":"Fiscal Federalism and the Stability and Growth Pact: A Difficult Union","authors":"Fabrizio Balassone, D. Franco","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2095225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Balassone and Franco note that while the budget rules that frame EMU apply to national States, several EMU member nations are already organised on a federal basis and others, pressed by political and economic needs, have started to enact reforms aimed at increasing the degree of decentralisation. They highlight several critical areas in the interaction of fiscal decentralisation and the Stability and Growth Pact. Balassone and Franco point to the reduced flexibility of the European approach compared with solutions adopted in federally structured countries and to the asymmetry between the responsibilities laid on national and local governments by European rules (compliance with the rules depends on the conduct of all levels of government, but de facto it is the central government that is answerable to the EU and that must pay the price for non-compliance). This calls for strict controls over local governments to prevent free-riding. The authors examine alternative solutions to deal with these problems, such as the mechanical extension of the Stability and Growth Pact, the introduction of a golden rule for decentralised governments, also in the form of a market for deficit permits, and the use of reserve funds. Finally, Balassone and Franco analyse how the issue has been addressed in Italy through the introduction of the Domestic Stability Pact and stress the need for further significant refinements of these domestic rules.","PeriodicalId":265694,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Intergovernmental Relations & Federalism (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Intergovernmental Relations & Federalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2095225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Balassone and Franco note that while the budget rules that frame EMU apply to national States, several EMU member nations are already organised on a federal basis and others, pressed by political and economic needs, have started to enact reforms aimed at increasing the degree of decentralisation. They highlight several critical areas in the interaction of fiscal decentralisation and the Stability and Growth Pact. Balassone and Franco point to the reduced flexibility of the European approach compared with solutions adopted in federally structured countries and to the asymmetry between the responsibilities laid on national and local governments by European rules (compliance with the rules depends on the conduct of all levels of government, but de facto it is the central government that is answerable to the EU and that must pay the price for non-compliance). This calls for strict controls over local governments to prevent free-riding. The authors examine alternative solutions to deal with these problems, such as the mechanical extension of the Stability and Growth Pact, the introduction of a golden rule for decentralised governments, also in the form of a market for deficit permits, and the use of reserve funds. Finally, Balassone and Franco analyse how the issue has been addressed in Italy through the introduction of the Domestic Stability Pact and stress the need for further significant refinements of these domestic rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政联邦制与《稳定与增长公约》:一个艰难的联盟
Balassone和Franco指出,虽然欧洲货币联盟的预算规则适用于各个国家,但一些欧洲货币联盟成员国已经在联邦基础上组织起来,而其他国家迫于政治和经济需求,已经开始实施旨在提高权力下放程度的改革。他们强调了财政分权与《稳定与增长公约》相互作用中的几个关键领域。Balassone和Franco指出,与联邦制国家采取的解决方案相比,欧洲方法的灵活性降低了,而且欧洲规则赋予国家和地方政府的责任不对称(遵守规则取决于各级政府的行为,但事实上是中央政府对欧盟负责,必须为不遵守规则付出代价)。这就要求对地方政府进行严格控制,防止搭便车。两位作者研究了应对这些问题的替代解决方案,例如机械地延长《稳定与增长公约》(Stability and Growth Pact),为分权政府引入黄金法则(同样以赤字许可市场的形式),以及使用储备基金。最后,Balassone和Franco分析了意大利是如何通过引入《国内稳定公约》(Domestic Stability Pact)来解决这一问题的,并强调有必要进一步大幅完善这些国内规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Central Redistribution with Decentralized Redistribution ОСОБЕННОСТИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РАЗВИТИЯ МЕЖРЕГИОНАЛЬНОГО СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВА В РОССИИ (Features and Prospects for Development of Interregional Cooperation in Russia) Preventing COVID-19 Fatalities: State versus Federal Policies American Exceptionalism and the Benefits of Statehood: An Analysis of the Growth Effects of Joining the United States of America Federal Governments Around the World: A Comparative Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1