Preventing COVID-19 Fatalities: State versus Federal Policies

Jean-Paul Renne, Guillaume Roussellet, G. Schwenkler
{"title":"Preventing COVID-19 Fatalities: State versus Federal Policies","authors":"Jean-Paul Renne, Guillaume Roussellet, G. Schwenkler","doi":"10.1101/2020.10.28.20221952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are policies implemented in individual states to prevent pandemic deaths effective when there is no policy coordination by the federal government? We answer this question by developing a stochastic extension of a SIRD epidemiological model for a country composed of multiple states. Our model allows for interstate mobility. We consider three policies: mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, and interstate travel bans. We fit our model to daily U.S. state-level COVID-19 death counts and exploit our estimates to produce various policy counterfactuals. While the restrictions imposed by some states inhibited a significant number of virus deaths, we find that more than two-thirds of U.S. COVID-19 deaths could have been prevented by late September 2020 had the federal government imposed federal mandates as early as some of the earliest states did. Our results highlight the need for a coordination-aimed approach by a federal government for the successful containment of a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":265694,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Intergovernmental Relations & Federalism (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Intergovernmental Relations & Federalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.28.20221952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Are policies implemented in individual states to prevent pandemic deaths effective when there is no policy coordination by the federal government? We answer this question by developing a stochastic extension of a SIRD epidemiological model for a country composed of multiple states. Our model allows for interstate mobility. We consider three policies: mask mandates, stay-at-home orders, and interstate travel bans. We fit our model to daily U.S. state-level COVID-19 death counts and exploit our estimates to produce various policy counterfactuals. While the restrictions imposed by some states inhibited a significant number of virus deaths, we find that more than two-thirds of U.S. COVID-19 deaths could have been prevented by late September 2020 had the federal government imposed federal mandates as early as some of the earliest states did. Our results highlight the need for a coordination-aimed approach by a federal government for the successful containment of a pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防COVID-19死亡:州与联邦政策
在联邦政府没有政策协调的情况下,各州实施的预防大流行死亡的政策是否有效?我们通过开发一个由多个州组成的国家的SIRD流行病学模型的随机扩展来回答这个问题。我们的模型允许州际流动。我们考虑了三项政策:口罩强制令、居家令和州际旅行禁令。我们将我们的模型与美国每日州一级的COVID-19死亡人数相匹配,并利用我们的估计来产生各种政策反事实。虽然一些州实施的限制抑制了大量的病毒死亡,但我们发现,如果联邦政府像最早的一些州那样尽早实施联邦命令,到2020年9月底,美国超过三分之二的COVID-19死亡病例本可以避免。我们的研究结果突出表明,联邦政府需要采取以协调为目标的方法,才能成功遏制大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Central Redistribution with Decentralized Redistribution ОСОБЕННОСТИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РАЗВИТИЯ МЕЖРЕГИОНАЛЬНОГО СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВА В РОССИИ (Features and Prospects for Development of Interregional Cooperation in Russia) Preventing COVID-19 Fatalities: State versus Federal Policies American Exceptionalism and the Benefits of Statehood: An Analysis of the Growth Effects of Joining the United States of America Federal Governments Around the World: A Comparative Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1