On reliability growth testing

E. Demko
{"title":"On reliability growth testing","authors":"E. Demko","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliability development growth testing (RDGT) is the most common method used to improve equipment reliability. The author had an opportunity to perform an analysis of hardware that experienced environmental stress screening (ESS), environmental qualification testing (EQT), RDGT and field usage. The failure mode and corrective action data were used to qualitatively assess the effectiveness of RDGT testing. The results of this analysis yield the following conclusions: (1) RDGT is not a very good precipitator of field related failure modes, therefore RDGT alone does not appear to be a strong driver of reliability growth; (2) RDGT, EQT, ESS, and EQT tests precipitate a high percentage of failure modes that occur only in \"chamber-type\" environments, and are not related to field use; (3) of the three \"chamber-type\" tests (ESS, RDGT, and EQT) evaluated as precipitators of field related failure modes, ESS appears to be the most effective; and (4) \"chamber-type\" tests are more efficient in developing corrective actions than field operation.","PeriodicalId":143102,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Reliability development growth testing (RDGT) is the most common method used to improve equipment reliability. The author had an opportunity to perform an analysis of hardware that experienced environmental stress screening (ESS), environmental qualification testing (EQT), RDGT and field usage. The failure mode and corrective action data were used to qualitatively assess the effectiveness of RDGT testing. The results of this analysis yield the following conclusions: (1) RDGT is not a very good precipitator of field related failure modes, therefore RDGT alone does not appear to be a strong driver of reliability growth; (2) RDGT, EQT, ESS, and EQT tests precipitate a high percentage of failure modes that occur only in "chamber-type" environments, and are not related to field use; (3) of the three "chamber-type" tests (ESS, RDGT, and EQT) evaluated as precipitators of field related failure modes, ESS appears to be the most effective; and (4) "chamber-type" tests are more efficient in developing corrective actions than field operation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于可靠性增长试验
可靠性发展增长试验(RDGT)是提高设备可靠性最常用的方法。作者有机会对硬件进行了环境应力筛选(ESS)、环境合格测试(EQT)、RDGT和现场使用情况的分析。失效模式和纠正措施数据用于定性评估RDGT测试的有效性。分析结果得出以下结论:(1)RDGT并不是现场相关失效模式的一个很好的促发器,因此RDGT本身并不是可靠性增长的一个强大驱动力;(2) RDGT、EQT、ESS和EQT试验沉淀出高百分比的故障模式,这些模式只发生在“室型”环境中,与现场使用无关;(3)在三种“室型”试验(ESS、RDGT和EQT)中,ESS似乎是最有效的;和(4)"室式"试验在制定纠正措施方面比现场作业更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of hardware and software faults on ARQ schemes-an experimental study A verification tool to measure software in critical systems Understanding and solving the real reliability assurance problems Applying fuzzy cognitive-maps knowledge-representation to failure modes effects analysis Mass-transit system service quality: tradeoff analysis on reliability, maintainability and logistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1