EU Legal Migration Policy: Are There Prospects for Progress or Is It at a Standstill?

Justyna Godlewska-Szyrkowa
{"title":"EU Legal Migration Policy: Are There Prospects for Progress or Is It at a Standstill?","authors":"Justyna Godlewska-Szyrkowa","doi":"10.33067/se.4.2021.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to attempt to identify the state of, and prospects for, the development of the common policy of the European Union regarding legal migration from third countries. The subject of interest is, above all, legal economic migration, which is crucial from the perspective of certain demographic processes taking place in the EU, the changes and needs of the Community’s labour market, and the challenges posed by the digital transformation. The adopted hypothesis assumes that, within the framework of EU migration and asylum policy, policy as regards legal economic migration is still an underdeveloped area and remains in the hands of individual Member States. Initiatives undertaken in this area remain overshadowed by the main focus of the common migration and asylum policy, namely the development of a common asylum system and the prevention of irregular migration. Policy regarding legal economic migration in the near future will mainly be created by Member States and play out on the domestic stage due to the lack of direct motivation for its development at the Community level. In this case, the strength of particular stakeholders’ interests is not balanced out by any direct and easily identifi able benefits to be gained from the adopted common solutions.","PeriodicalId":365693,"journal":{"name":"Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Europejskie - Studies in European Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33067/se.4.2021.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article is to attempt to identify the state of, and prospects for, the development of the common policy of the European Union regarding legal migration from third countries. The subject of interest is, above all, legal economic migration, which is crucial from the perspective of certain demographic processes taking place in the EU, the changes and needs of the Community’s labour market, and the challenges posed by the digital transformation. The adopted hypothesis assumes that, within the framework of EU migration and asylum policy, policy as regards legal economic migration is still an underdeveloped area and remains in the hands of individual Member States. Initiatives undertaken in this area remain overshadowed by the main focus of the common migration and asylum policy, namely the development of a common asylum system and the prevention of irregular migration. Policy regarding legal economic migration in the near future will mainly be created by Member States and play out on the domestic stage due to the lack of direct motivation for its development at the Community level. In this case, the strength of particular stakeholders’ interests is not balanced out by any direct and easily identifi able benefits to be gained from the adopted common solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟合法移民政策:有进步的前景还是停滞不前?
本文的目的是试图确定欧盟关于第三国合法移民的共同政策的发展状况和前景。首先,感兴趣的主题是合法经济移民,从欧盟发生的某些人口进程、共同体劳动力市场的变化和需求以及数字化转型带来的挑战的角度来看,合法经济移民至关重要。所采用的假设认为,在欧盟移民和庇护政策的框架内,有关合法经济移民的政策仍然是一个不发达的领域,仍然掌握在各个成员国手中。共同移徙和庇护政策的主要重点,即制定共同庇护制度和防止非正常移徙,使这一领域采取的主动行动黯然失色。在不久的将来,有关合法经济移民的政策将主要由会员国制定,并在国内舞台上发挥作用,因为在共同体一级缺乏发展的直接动力。在这种情况下,特定利益相关者的利益强度并没有被从采用的共同解决方案中获得的任何直接和容易识别的利益所平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Rule of Law Crisis in Poland and “Normative Power EU” Thesis: Challenges and Implications Opposition Discourse About National Recovery and Resilience Plans. Poland and Hungary Compared Is the Spanish Army’s Experimental Brigade 2035 a Result of Civil-military Relations? A Historical Overview (1923–2021) In-betweenness and Migration Interdependence: Lessons from Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine War and Food (In)security – A Lesson from the Russian-Ukrainian Confl ict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1