Peripheral Eosinophilia as an Ominous Marker of Poor Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Correlation Between Absolute Eosinophilia and Dermatology Life Quality Index in Various Pruritic Dermatoses

Vijay Deepak Joshi, V. Belgaumkar, S. Pradhan
{"title":"Peripheral Eosinophilia as an Ominous Marker of Poor Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Correlation Between Absolute Eosinophilia and Dermatology Life Quality Index in Various Pruritic Dermatoses","authors":"Vijay Deepak Joshi, V. Belgaumkar, S. Pradhan","doi":"10.5812/jssc-139132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Eosinophils are multifunctional cells of innate immunity and play a pivotal role in allergic, antiparasitic, phagocytotic, and tissue repair functions. These cells are sentinel mediators of pruritus. The increase in the absolute eosinophil count (AEC) in pruritic dermatoses is considered an objective marker of disease severity. The dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a questionnaire assessing subjective impairment in quality of life. Objectives: To assess the correlation between AEC and DLQI in pruritic dermatoses. Methods: This cross-sectional observational-correlational study was carried out over a period of 6 months in a tertiary care center on 100 patients diagnosed with various clinical forms of pruritic dermatoses after obtaining informed consent. The DLQI score was calculated using a pre-validated questionnaire followed by the determination of AEC in whole blood samples. Results: Most patients had inflammatory diseases (26%), followed by infections (16%) and urticaria (14%). Mild eosinophilia was observed in 28% of cases, moderate eosinophilia in 22%, and severe eosinophilia in 6% of the cases. In terms of the DLQI score, the impact of the disease on quality of life was profound in 37% of the patients and enormous among 12% of them. Quality of life was unaffected in 5% of the cases. Overall, there was a significant strong positive correlation between AEC and DLQI (r = 0.649, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: A significant correlation was noticed between AEC and subjective DLQI as a marker of disease burden in various forms of pruritic dermatoses. Thus, AEC can be regarded as a perceived marker of disease prognostication, an objective equivalent to quality of life, and, most importantly, a potential target for therapeutic interventions.","PeriodicalId":174870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Skin and Stem Cell","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Skin and Stem Cell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jssc-139132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eosinophils are multifunctional cells of innate immunity and play a pivotal role in allergic, antiparasitic, phagocytotic, and tissue repair functions. These cells are sentinel mediators of pruritus. The increase in the absolute eosinophil count (AEC) in pruritic dermatoses is considered an objective marker of disease severity. The dermatology life quality index (DLQI) is a questionnaire assessing subjective impairment in quality of life. Objectives: To assess the correlation between AEC and DLQI in pruritic dermatoses. Methods: This cross-sectional observational-correlational study was carried out over a period of 6 months in a tertiary care center on 100 patients diagnosed with various clinical forms of pruritic dermatoses after obtaining informed consent. The DLQI score was calculated using a pre-validated questionnaire followed by the determination of AEC in whole blood samples. Results: Most patients had inflammatory diseases (26%), followed by infections (16%) and urticaria (14%). Mild eosinophilia was observed in 28% of cases, moderate eosinophilia in 22%, and severe eosinophilia in 6% of the cases. In terms of the DLQI score, the impact of the disease on quality of life was profound in 37% of the patients and enormous among 12% of them. Quality of life was unaffected in 5% of the cases. Overall, there was a significant strong positive correlation between AEC and DLQI (r = 0.649, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: A significant correlation was noticed between AEC and subjective DLQI as a marker of disease burden in various forms of pruritic dermatoses. Thus, AEC can be regarded as a perceived marker of disease prognostication, an objective equivalent to quality of life, and, most importantly, a potential target for therapeutic interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周嗜酸性粒细胞增多是生活质量差的不祥标志:一项评估各种瘙痒性皮肤病中绝对嗜酸性粒细胞增多与皮肤病生活质量指数相关性的横断面研究
背景:嗜酸性粒细胞是先天性免疫的多功能细胞,在过敏、抗寄生虫、吞噬和组织修复等功能中发挥着重要作用。这些细胞是瘙痒的前哨介质。瘙痒性皮肤病中嗜酸性粒细胞绝对计数(AEC)的增加被认为是疾病严重程度的客观标志。皮肤科生活质量指数(DLQI)是一种评估主观生活质量损害的问卷调查。目的:探讨瘙痒性皮肤病AEC与DLQI的相关性。方法:本横断面观察相关性研究是在一家三级医疗中心对100名经知情同意后诊断为各种临床形式瘙痒性皮肤病的患者进行为期6个月的研究。DLQI评分采用预先验证的问卷计算,然后测定全血样本中的AEC。结果:以炎症性疾病为主(26%),其次为感染(16%)和荨麻疹(14%)。轻度嗜酸性粒细胞增多的病例占28%,中度嗜酸性粒细胞增多的病例占22%,重度嗜酸性粒细胞增多的病例占6%。在DLQI评分方面,疾病对生活质量的影响在37%的患者中是深刻的,在12%的患者中是巨大的。5%的患者的生活质量未受影响。总体而言,AEC与DLQI呈正相关(r = 0.649, P < 0.0001)。结论:在各种形式的瘙痒性皮肤病中,AEC和主观DLQI作为疾病负担的标志之间存在显著的相关性。因此,AEC可被视为疾病预后的感知标记,客观等同于生活质量,最重要的是,它是治疗干预的潜在目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crisaborole in Atopic Dermatitis An Update on the Etiopathogenesis and Management of Morbihan Disease: A Narrative Review Facial Acne Management and Sebum Reduction via Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatment: A Review The Gender-Specific Dynamics of Charismaphobia in Relation to Body-Esteem and Self-Esteem: Implications for Cosmetic and Psycho-Dermatology Observational Study of the Changes in Skin Thickness Among Children with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Topical Mometasone Furoate 0.1% Cream
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1