AKIBAT HUKUM DEBITOR WANPRESTASI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN HAK PATEN SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA

Yudhistira Ardana, D. Herlambang, Y. Wicaksono, M. R. Wijaya
{"title":"AKIBAT HUKUM DEBITOR WANPRESTASI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN HAK PATEN SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA","authors":"Yudhistira Ardana, D. Herlambang, Y. Wicaksono, M. R. Wijaya","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic actors in the framework of developing a business as owner or patent holder can access credit from financial institutions with patents as objects of fiduciary institution. So that patents are based on the law, but were born because they had to be advance in advance between the fiduciary guarantee institution as the creditor and the inventor as the debtor The problem in this study is why patents can be used as fiduciary collateral objects and how the legal consequences for debtors who commit defaults. This research is a normative legal research. In this study, what is examined is the positive legal provisions regarding patent rights, namely Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. This type of research used is descriptive with a problem approach that will be conducted normatively juridical. Patents can be used as collateral for debt by using fiduciary security institutions because patents are part of intellectual property rights where patents have economic principles that will provide economic benefits to the patent owner. Patents are classified as immovable property. The legal consequences of debtors who commit default will lead to fiduciary guarantee execution activities. Execution of fiduciary collateral is confiscation and sale of objects which are subject to fiduciary collateral. As a result of the sale of this fiduciary object in the form of a patent, the creditors lose their debts to the debtor, which means the debtor's debt has been paid off, then from the debtor's loss of patent rights he previously had such as.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Economic actors in the framework of developing a business as owner or patent holder can access credit from financial institutions with patents as objects of fiduciary institution. So that patents are based on the law, but were born because they had to be advance in advance between the fiduciary guarantee institution as the creditor and the inventor as the debtor The problem in this study is why patents can be used as fiduciary collateral objects and how the legal consequences for debtors who commit defaults. This research is a normative legal research. In this study, what is examined is the positive legal provisions regarding patent rights, namely Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. This type of research used is descriptive with a problem approach that will be conducted normatively juridical. Patents can be used as collateral for debt by using fiduciary security institutions because patents are part of intellectual property rights where patents have economic principles that will provide economic benefits to the patent owner. Patents are classified as immovable property. The legal consequences of debtors who commit default will lead to fiduciary guarantee execution activities. Execution of fiduciary collateral is confiscation and sale of objects which are subject to fiduciary collateral. As a result of the sale of this fiduciary object in the form of a patent, the creditors lose their debts to the debtor, which means the debtor's debt has been paid off, then from the debtor's loss of patent rights he previously had such as.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所谓的“债务人法官法”将专利法作为受托人抵押品的条款
在发展企业的框架内,作为所有者或专利持有人的经济行为者可以从以专利为信托机构对象的金融机构获得信贷。因此,专利是有法律依据的,但它的诞生是因为它必须在作为债权人的信义担保机构和作为债务人的发明人之间预先进行。本文研究的问题是,为什么专利可以作为信义担保对象,以及债务人违约的法律后果如何。本研究是一项规范性法律研究。在本研究中,研究的是关于专利权的积极法律规定,即2016年关于专利法的第13号法和1999年关于信托担保的第42号法。使用的这种类型的研究是描述性的问题方法,将进行规范的司法。专利可以通过信托担保机构作为债务抵押品,因为专利是知识产权的一部分,专利具有经济原则,将为专利权人提供经济利益。专利被归类为不动产。债务人违约的法律后果将导致信义担保执行活动。执行信义抵押品是没收和出售受信义抵押品约束的物品。由于以专利的形式出售这一受托物,债权人失去了对债务人的债务,这意味着债务人的债务已经还清,那么债务人就失去了他以前所拥有的专利权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENINGKATAN PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI MELALUI POLITIK HUKUM OMNIBUS LAW KEDUDUKAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA AKIBAT HUKUM DEBITOR WANPRESTASI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN HAK PATEN SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA IMPLEMENTASI CITA HUKUM DALAM MENCAPAI NILAI KEADILAN GUNA MEMBANGUN PEMIMPIN YANG BERKARAKTER DI KOTA PALEMBANG PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP KORPORASI BERDASARKAN UU NO 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1