Yudhistira Ardana, D. Herlambang, Y. Wicaksono, M. R. Wijaya
Economic actors in the framework of developing a business as owner or patent holder can access credit from financial institutions with patents as objects of fiduciary institution. So that patents are based on the law, but were born because they had to be advance in advance between the fiduciary guarantee institution as the creditor and the inventor as the debtor The problem in this study is why patents can be used as fiduciary collateral objects and how the legal consequences for debtors who commit defaults. This research is a normative legal research. In this study, what is examined is the positive legal provisions regarding patent rights, namely Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. This type of research used is descriptive with a problem approach that will be conducted normatively juridical. Patents can be used as collateral for debt by using fiduciary security institutions because patents are part of intellectual property rights where patents have economic principles that will provide economic benefits to the patent owner. Patents are classified as immovable property. The legal consequences of debtors who commit default will lead to fiduciary guarantee execution activities. Execution of fiduciary collateral is confiscation and sale of objects which are subject to fiduciary collateral. As a result of the sale of this fiduciary object in the form of a patent, the creditors lose their debts to the debtor, which means the debtor's debt has been paid off, then from the debtor's loss of patent rights he previously had such as.
{"title":"AKIBAT HUKUM DEBITOR WANPRESTASI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN HAK PATEN SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA","authors":"Yudhistira Ardana, D. Herlambang, Y. Wicaksono, M. R. Wijaya","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.214","url":null,"abstract":"Economic actors in the framework of developing a business as owner or patent holder can access credit from financial institutions with patents as objects of fiduciary institution. So that patents are based on the law, but were born because they had to be advance in advance between the fiduciary guarantee institution as the creditor and the inventor as the debtor The problem in this study is why patents can be used as fiduciary collateral objects and how the legal consequences for debtors who commit defaults. This research is a normative legal research. In this study, what is examined is the positive legal provisions regarding patent rights, namely Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. This type of research used is descriptive with a problem approach that will be conducted normatively juridical. Patents can be used as collateral for debt by using fiduciary security institutions because patents are part of intellectual property rights where patents have economic principles that will provide economic benefits to the patent owner. Patents are classified as immovable property. The legal consequences of debtors who commit default will lead to fiduciary guarantee execution activities. Execution of fiduciary collateral is confiscation and sale of objects which are subject to fiduciary collateral. As a result of the sale of this fiduciary object in the form of a patent, the creditors lose their debts to the debtor, which means the debtor's debt has been paid off, then from the debtor's loss of patent rights he previously had such as.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124592082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Omnibus Law sebagai upaya Pemerintah dalam meningkatkan pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia dan meningkatkan kesejahteraan seluruh rakyat Indonesia dalam perumusan maupun implementasinya harus berimbang dalam tataran efektivitas dan akuntabilitas dengan memperhatikan aspek yuridis, politik, sosiologi dan ekonomi. Kata kunci: Pembangunan Ekonomi, Politik Hukum , Omnibus Law Abstract Omnibus Law, the Government's efforts to improve economic development in Indonesia and improve the welfare of all Indonesian people in its formulation and implementation must be balanced in the level of effectiveness and accountability by taking into account juridical, political, sociological and economic aspects.
{"title":"PENINGKATAN PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI MELALUI POLITIK HUKUM OMNIBUS LAW","authors":"Kinaria Afriani, Derry Angling Kesuma","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.441","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.441","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000Omnibus Law sebagai upaya Pemerintah dalam meningkatkan pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia dan meningkatkan kesejahteraan seluruh rakyat Indonesia dalam perumusan maupun implementasinya harus berimbang dalam tataran efektivitas dan akuntabilitas dengan memperhatikan aspek yuridis, politik, sosiologi dan ekonomi. \u0000 \u0000Kata kunci: Pembangunan Ekonomi, Politik Hukum , Omnibus Law \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000Omnibus Law, the Government's efforts to improve economic development in Indonesia and improve the welfare of all Indonesian people in its formulation and implementation must be balanced in the level of effectiveness and accountability by taking into account juridical, political, sociological and economic aspects.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"298 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115926019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Hukum dalam perkembangannya, mendorong para ahli hukum untuk menghasilkan suatu definisi mengenai hukum. Dapat ditemukan bahwa definisi mengenai hukum yang dihasilkan oleh para ahli memiliki karakteristik yang berbeda satu dengan yang lain. Hal ini memiliki alasan bahwa dalam proses menghasilkan definisi tersebut para ahli memiliki sudut pandang yang berbeda. Jadi, Cita hukum ini harus memiliki bentuk, baik dalam tataran teoritis hingga pada tataran praktis. Pada tataran teoritis, cita hukum berawal pada tahap interpretasi yang berujung pada tataran Praktis, yaitu implementasi. Pada tahap interpretasi, cita hukum ini berawal dari konsep hukum itu sendiri. Adapun dalam penulisan penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif-empiris melalui studi pustaka dari beberapa bahan buku dan media lainnya serta observasi lapangan di kota Palembang melalui wawancara. Kata Kunci : Hukum, Nilai Keadilan, Pemimpin. Abstract The law in its development, encourages legal experts to get a resolution on law. Can be found with the resolution of the law produced by experts have different characteristics with the others. This has a reason in the process of producing these experts have different points of view. So, this legal ideal must have a form, from the legal level to the practical level. At the level of transition, the purpose of law starts at interpretation which ends at the practical level, namely implementation. At the interpretation stage, this legal idea starts with the concept of law itself. Regarding this research, the author uses the normative-empirical research method through library research from several book materials and other media as well as field observations in the city of Palembang through interviews.
{"title":"IMPLEMENTASI CITA HUKUM DALAM MENCAPAI NILAI KEADILAN GUNA MEMBANGUN PEMIMPIN YANG BERKARAKTER DI KOTA PALEMBANG","authors":"Ning Herlina, Yanuar Syam Putra","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.227","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000 \u0000Hukum dalam perkembangannya, mendorong para ahli hukum untuk menghasilkan suatu definisi mengenai hukum. Dapat ditemukan bahwa definisi mengenai hukum yang dihasilkan oleh para ahli memiliki karakteristik yang berbeda satu dengan yang lain. Hal ini memiliki alasan bahwa dalam proses menghasilkan definisi tersebut para ahli memiliki sudut pandang yang berbeda. Jadi, Cita hukum ini harus memiliki bentuk, baik dalam tataran teoritis hingga pada tataran praktis. Pada tataran teoritis, cita hukum berawal pada tahap interpretasi yang berujung pada tataran Praktis, yaitu implementasi. Pada tahap interpretasi, cita hukum ini berawal dari konsep hukum itu sendiri. Adapun dalam penulisan penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian normatif-empiris melalui studi pustaka dari beberapa bahan buku dan media lainnya serta observasi lapangan di kota Palembang melalui wawancara. \u0000 \u0000Kata Kunci : Hukum, Nilai Keadilan, Pemimpin. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000The law in its development, encourages legal experts to get a resolution on law. Can be found with the resolution of the law produced by experts have different characteristics with the others. This has a reason in the process of producing these experts have different points of view. So, this legal ideal must have a form, from the legal level to the practical level. At the level of transition, the purpose of law starts at interpretation which ends at the practical level, namely implementation. At the interpretation stage, this legal idea starts with the concept of law itself. Regarding this research, the author uses the normative-empirical research method through library research from several book materials and other media as well as field observations in the city of Palembang through interviews.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125484032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Corona virus disease 2019 (covid-19) muncul pertama kali sejak akhir 2019 di wuhan, china. Menyebar ke Indonesia sekitar februari 2020.sampai sekarang angka kasusnya semakin meningkat. berbagai dampak yang ditibulkan, baik dampak positif maupun negatif. pengaruh tersebut cukup signifikan di dalam masyarakat, bahkan Indonesia telah memasuki era new normal sejak awal juni lalu. Meski demikian, masyarakat tetap diharuskan beraktivitas sesuai dengan protokol kesehatan, terutama perilaku physical distancing dan pola hidup yang sehat. Harus disadari bahwa segala sesuatu yang terjadi pada lingkungan, tidak terlepas dari campur tangan manusia, sehingga dampaknya juga kembali kepada manusia itu sendiri. Perilaku masyarakat dalam memerangi covid-19, mendorong sikap manusia untuk saling membutuhkan satu sama lain, hal tersebut merupakan proses simbiosis mutualisme sebagai konsekuensi logis yang harus dihadapi masyarakat. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif untuk mendeskripsikan permasalahan dampak covid-19 terhadap lingkungan hidup, serta pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku sosial. Dengan tujuan untuk memahami perilaku sosial dalam lingkungan hidup ditengah pandemi covid-19. Kata Kunci ; Covid-19, Lingkungan Hidup, Perilaku Sosial Abstract Corona virus disease 2019 (covid-19) first appeared since the end of 2019 in Wuhan, China. Spread to Indonesia around February 2020.Various impacts that were generated, both positive and negative impacts. As well as significant influence in society, even Indonesia has entered a new normal era since early June, but people are still required to behave in accordance with health protocols, especially physical distancing behavior and healthy lifestyles. It must be realized that everything that happens to the environment, it can not be separated from human intervention, so that the impact also returns to humans themselves. Community behavior in combating covid-19, encouraging human attitudes to need one another, this is a process of symbiotic mutualism as a logical consequence that must be faced by society. This paper uses qualitative research methods, with a normative juridical approach to describe the problem of covid-19 impact on the environment and its influence on social behavior. With the aim of understanding social behavior in the environment amid the covid-19 pandemic.
{"title":"Pengaruh Covid-19 Terhadap Hukum Lingkungan Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Perilaku Sosial","authors":"Riska Riska, Aminah Aminah","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.268","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000Corona virus disease 2019 (covid-19) muncul pertama kali sejak akhir 2019 di wuhan, china. Menyebar ke Indonesia sekitar februari 2020.sampai sekarang angka kasusnya semakin meningkat. berbagai dampak yang ditibulkan, baik dampak positif maupun negatif. pengaruh tersebut cukup signifikan di dalam masyarakat, bahkan Indonesia telah memasuki era new normal sejak awal juni lalu. Meski demikian, masyarakat tetap diharuskan beraktivitas sesuai dengan protokol kesehatan, terutama perilaku physical distancing dan pola hidup yang sehat. Harus disadari bahwa segala sesuatu yang terjadi pada lingkungan, tidak terlepas dari campur tangan manusia, sehingga dampaknya juga kembali kepada manusia itu sendiri. Perilaku masyarakat dalam memerangi covid-19, mendorong sikap manusia untuk saling membutuhkan satu sama lain, hal tersebut merupakan proses simbiosis mutualisme sebagai konsekuensi logis yang harus dihadapi masyarakat. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif untuk mendeskripsikan permasalahan dampak covid-19 terhadap lingkungan hidup, serta pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku sosial. Dengan tujuan untuk memahami perilaku sosial dalam lingkungan hidup ditengah pandemi covid-19. \u0000 \u0000Kata Kunci ; Covid-19, Lingkungan Hidup, Perilaku Sosial \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000Corona virus disease 2019 (covid-19) first appeared since the end of 2019 in Wuhan, China. Spread to Indonesia around February 2020.Various impacts that were generated, both positive and negative impacts. As well as significant influence in society, even Indonesia has entered a new normal era since early June, but people are still required to behave in accordance with health protocols, especially physical distancing behavior and healthy lifestyles. It must be realized that everything that happens to the environment, it can not be separated from human intervention, so that the impact also returns to humans themselves. Community behavior in combating covid-19, encouraging human attitudes to need one another, this is a process of symbiotic mutualism as a logical consequence that must be faced by society. This paper uses qualitative research methods, with a normative juridical approach to describe the problem of covid-19 impact on the environment and its influence on social behavior. With the aim of understanding social behavior in the environment amid the covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133941574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia memang seringkali diperdebatkan, hal ini terbukti dengan Putusan-Putusan MK yang berubah-ubah. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusannya pernah beberapa kali memutuskan berbeda tentang kedudukan KPK ini dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi pernah memutuskan KPK merupakan lembaga negara independen di luar ranah kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif. Pernah pula memutuskan bahwa KPK merupakan eksekutif dilihat dari kewenangannya. Putusan-putusan MK ini tentu saja membawa pengaruh terhadap undang-undang KPK. Revisi undang-undang KPK terbaru, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 menyatakan KPK masuk dalam ranah kekuasaan eksekutif sehingga dengan demikian KPK dapat menjadi objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). Hal demikian tentu saja menambah panjang perdebatan di kalangan ahli hukum dengan argumentasinya masing-masing. Dari argumentasi-argumentasi tersebut penulis menganggap KPK adalah lembaga negara independen di luar struktur organ negara yang utama. Hal ini sejalan dengan theory the new separation of power sebagai konsekuensi dari teori negara kesejahteraan (welfare state) di era abad modern ini. Sebagai lembaga negara independen yang kedudukannya tidak sekuat lembaga negara utama dalam ranah kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif tentu saja KPK bisa dibubarkan jika lembaga yang selama ini sebetulnya mempunyai wewenang kuat untuk melaksanakan penegakan hukum dalam rangka pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi (Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan) mampu berbenah diri. Selama belum mampu berbenah maka wewenang tersebut bisa dilaksanakan oleh KPK yang keberadaannya sampai saat ini masih tetap diperlukan dalam rangka pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Kata kunci: Kedudukan KPK, Sistem Ketatanegaraan, Indonesia Abstract The position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the constitutional system of Indonesia is often debated. This is evidenced by the inconsistent decisions of the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court has ever made different decisions several times regarding the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the constitutional system of Indonesia. The Constitutional Court once decided that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was an independent state institution outside the realm of executive, legislative and judicial powers. It has also decided that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is an executive body in terms of its authority. These inconsistent decisions of the Constitutional Court, of course, have an influence on the law of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The latest revision of the law of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), namely the Law Number 19 of 2019 states that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is classified to be in the realm of executive power so that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)
印度尼西亚公民事务总署(KPK)的腐败问题经常得到讨论，这是通过不断变化的MK判决得到证明的。宪法法院曾多次就朝鲜委员会在印尼公民制度中的这一立场作出不同意见。宪法法院曾认为朝鲜劳动党是一个独立的国家机构，超越执行、立法和司法领域。还没有决定执行命令是基于执行权力。这些MK判决确实对朝鲜劳动党法案产生了影响。最近修订的朝鲜劳动党法案，即2019年的第19条，宣布它属于行政权力体系，因此它可以成为众议院议长权利的对象。这当然增加了律师们对各自论点的辩论。从这些论点中，作者认为朝鲜劳动党是国家主要器官结构之外的一个独立的国家机构。这与现代福利国家理论的新权力分割是一致的。作为一个独立的国家机构，其权力不像在行政、立法和司法管辖区的主要国家机构那样强大，如果该机构在消除腐败犯罪方面具有强大的执法权力，那么它当然可以被解散。在不完善的情况下，该权力可以由朝鲜劳动党执行，其存在至今仍是消除印尼腐败犯罪的必要条件。关键词:在印度尼西亚的宪法系统中，朝鲜劳动党的地位、公民资格制度(KPK)被剥夺了权利。这是对宪法审判的不一致决定的证据。《宪法法庭》曾作出不同的决定，以印度尼西亚宪法体系为例。宪法法院曾经裁定腐败委员会是一个独立的机构，排除了行政、立法者和司法权力。它还决定，命运委员会(KPK)是它授权的一个行政机构。这些不一致的决定，当然，是对腐败委员会法律的影响。《法律》最新的revision Corruption Eradication委员会(pec) 2019年19号法律》,namely各州that The Corruption Eradication委员会(pec)是机密to be in《Corruption王国的行政权力,所以那Eradication委员会(pec)可以成为探究身边的物体》by《众议院(House of Representatives)。当然，这种情况是在审查论点的法律范围内进行的。在这些论点的基础上，我们的作者认为，腐败委员会是主要器官结构之外的独立机构。这与新权力分离的理论是现代社会福利理论的必然结果。据英国《独立报》的美国州的一个位置是美国不是美国特朗境玩州立institutions鲍尔警官,legislative和司法部门的挑选,当然,《Corruption Eradication委员会(pec) can be dissolved,如果《institutions那实际上有强壮的管理局要带出去在eradicating之《刑事法律执法行动of Corruption (Police and Prosecutors) are able to empower自己进去就对他们的权威。However，如果这些机构无法超越他们的授权，这种授权可以通过定罪委员会(KPK)解除，而这种存在仍然需要在根除犯罪行为的背景下存在。
{"title":"KEDUDUKAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA","authors":"Mahesa Rannie","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.384","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia memang seringkali diperdebatkan, hal ini terbukti dengan Putusan-Putusan MK yang berubah-ubah. Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam putusannya pernah beberapa kali memutuskan berbeda tentang kedudukan KPK ini dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi pernah memutuskan KPK merupakan lembaga negara independen di luar ranah kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif. Pernah pula memutuskan bahwa KPK merupakan eksekutif dilihat dari kewenangannya. Putusan-putusan MK ini tentu saja membawa pengaruh terhadap undang-undang KPK. Revisi undang-undang KPK terbaru, yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 menyatakan KPK masuk dalam ranah kekuasaan eksekutif sehingga dengan demikian KPK dapat menjadi objek hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR). Hal demikian tentu saja menambah panjang perdebatan di kalangan ahli hukum dengan argumentasinya masing-masing. Dari argumentasi-argumentasi tersebut penulis menganggap KPK adalah lembaga negara independen di luar struktur organ negara yang utama. Hal ini sejalan dengan theory the new separation of power sebagai konsekuensi dari teori negara kesejahteraan (welfare state) di era abad modern ini. Sebagai lembaga negara independen yang kedudukannya tidak sekuat lembaga negara utama dalam ranah kekuasaan eksekutif, legislatif, dan yudikatif tentu saja KPK bisa dibubarkan jika lembaga yang selama ini sebetulnya mempunyai wewenang kuat untuk melaksanakan penegakan hukum dalam rangka pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi (Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan) mampu berbenah diri. Selama belum mampu berbenah maka wewenang tersebut bisa dilaksanakan oleh KPK yang keberadaannya sampai saat ini masih tetap diperlukan dalam rangka pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. \u0000 \u0000Kata kunci: Kedudukan KPK, Sistem Ketatanegaraan, Indonesia \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000The position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the constitutional system of Indonesia is often debated. This is evidenced by the inconsistent decisions of the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court has ever made different decisions several times regarding the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the constitutional system of Indonesia. The Constitutional Court once decided that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) was an independent state institution outside the realm of executive, legislative and judicial powers. It has also decided that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is an executive body in terms of its authority. These inconsistent decisions of the Constitutional Court, of course, have an influence on the law of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The latest revision of the law of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), namely the Law Number 19 of 2019 states that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is classified to be in the realm of executive power so that the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"40 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120816537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi atas tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh korporasi dapat dilakukan oleh: korporasi, pengurus atau pengurus dan korporasi. Tindak pidana korupsi yang dapat dilakukan oleh korporasi adalah tindak pidana korupsi yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1), Pasal 3, Pasal 5 ayat (1), Pasal 6 ayat (1), Pasal 7, Pasal 13, Pasal 15, dan Pasal 16 Undang-Undang 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jadi tidak semua tindak pidana korupsi dapat dilakukan oleh korporasi.Dengan lahirnya Perma 13/2016 korporasi bisa dimintai pertanggungjawaban terkait tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh pengurus atau organ korporasi. Dengan demikian, pengurus merupakan direksi maupun komisaris yang telah tercantum dalam anggaran dasar sebuah korporasi. Untuk melihat direksi maupun komisaris tersebut dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam hal tindak pidana korporasi, maka perlu melihat sejauh mana keterlibatan direksi atau komisaris dalam tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh korporasi, dimana hal ini tercermin dalam adanya niat jahat (mens rea) dan perbuatan jahat (actus reus) yang dilakukan oleh direksi atau komisaris tersebut.
{"title":"PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP KORPORASI BERDASARKAN UU NO 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI","authors":"Sabungan Sibarani, Faisal Santiago","doi":"10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/LLJIH.V7I2.233","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000 \u0000Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi atas tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh korporasi dapat dilakukan oleh: korporasi, pengurus atau pengurus dan korporasi. Tindak pidana korupsi yang dapat dilakukan oleh korporasi adalah tindak pidana korupsi yang diatur dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1), Pasal 3, Pasal 5 ayat (1), Pasal 6 ayat (1), Pasal 7, Pasal 13, Pasal 15, dan Pasal 16 Undang-Undang 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jadi tidak semua tindak pidana korupsi dapat dilakukan oleh korporasi.Dengan lahirnya Perma 13/2016 korporasi bisa dimintai pertanggungjawaban terkait tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh pengurus atau organ korporasi. Dengan demikian, pengurus merupakan direksi maupun komisaris yang telah tercantum dalam anggaran dasar sebuah korporasi. Untuk melihat direksi maupun komisaris tersebut dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam hal tindak pidana korporasi, maka perlu melihat sejauh mana keterlibatan direksi atau komisaris dalam tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh korporasi, dimana hal ini tercermin dalam adanya niat jahat (mens rea) dan perbuatan jahat (actus reus) yang dilakukan oleh direksi atau komisaris tersebut.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128385250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Tujuan Otonomi daerah memberikan kemudahan daerah dalam melaksanakan kewenangan, sehingga dalam menjalankan kewenangan membawak efek positif dalam berinvestasi. Investasi bertujuan untuk peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat daerah serta peningkatan Pendapatan Daerah, tetapi otonomi sering disalahgunakan oleh Pemerintah daerah terutama yang berhubungan dengan perizinan, sehingga Investor mengalami kesulitan dan hambatan. Tujuan otonomi daerah supaya ada dampak positif serta memberi pelayan publik lebih mudah dan cepat, penyederhanaan Pelayanan Kegiatan Investasi, dan penyederhanaan (regulasi) pelayanan kegiatan ekonomi membantu kelancaran usaha dari para pelaku ekonomi, karena deregulasi dipandang untuk meningkatkan efisiensi bagi pelaku ekonomi. Adanya kepastian proses adminitrasi dan kepastian hukum yang dapat menjamin keamanan dan stabilitas politik Daerah, singkronisasi regulasi antar pemerintah daerah dengan pemerintah pusat, Daerah harus membuka diri dan mempermudah perizinan sektor investasi terutama berhubungan rekruitmen tenaga kerja yang besar, terukurnya kemampuan keuangan daerah dalam era otonomi daerah dengan menggunakan kinerja fiscal sehingga tercapainya keberhasilan daerah dalam menjalani otonomi daerah. Kata Kunci: Otonomi Daerah, Investasi. Abstract In doing investment, there are often problems, one of which is regional autonomy, the challenges of implementing investment in Indonesia in the era of regional autonomy in Indonesia. In its regulation, there is a system of division of authority in facilitating the entry of investments with the investment arrangements at the regional level referring to investment regulations at the national level. Therefore, although the direction of Indonesian economy after Regional Autonomy refers to the economy in the region, it must be remembered that the authority of regional autonomy towards regional independence remains within the framework of the unitary state. The direction of the investment policy and the increase in business activities through investment policies are expected to create opportunities for the growth and development of the business world for every large, medium, and small scale of economic actor. Simplification of Investment Services, Simplification (deregulation) economic activity services helps accelerate the operation of economic actors, because deregulation is seen to increase efficiency for economic actors. The certainty of the administrative process and legal certainty that can guarantee the security and political stability of the region, synchronization of regulations between the local government and the central government, faster in licensing and the realization of certainty, the regional government must open up and facilitate licensing of the investment sector, especially related to the large recruitment of workers, measurable regional financial capacity in the era of regional autonomy by using performance so that the regional achievement can successful
区域自治目标让区域自治在执行这些权力方面变得更容易，因此在行使这些权力方面可以带来积极的投资效果。投资旨在促进地方社会的经济和地方收入的增加，但自治往往被地方政府滥用，尤其是在许可证问题上，这给投资者带来了困难和障碍。区域自治的目标是让公共服务更容易、更迅速、简化投资活动服务和简化经济活动服务有助于促进经济参与者的顺利努力，因为放松管制被认为是为了提高经济效率。行政主管过程的确定性和法律确定性的存在可以保证安全和政治稳定的地区,地方政府与中央政府之间的同步监管,应该敞开心扉和投资促进部门许可地区劳动力尤其是你们联系新兵的大时代中,terukurnya区域财政能力用财政绩效,实现区域自治地区在经历了区域自治方面的成功。关键词:区域自治、投资。有10个问题，其中一个是区域自动投资，在印度尼西亚的地区自动投资的挑战。在规定中，有一种划分授权系统，在国家层面进行区域投资调配。因此，尽管在该地区的自然区域引用之后，印尼的主要经济，但它必须记住，地区自动独立的授权存在于本州的框架内。投资政策的方向和商业活动的增加预计将为各大、中、小规模经济活动创造商业世界的增长和发展机会。经济行动代理人为经济活动人员的行动提供简单的经济行动补偿，因为deregution被认为是为经济活动增加效率。请certainty》的过程和合法certainty,以至于可以保证地区安全与政治稳定》,synchronization regulations之《地方政府与中央政府之间,更快在licensing和《区域realization of certainty,政府必须打开和facilitate licensing《》的投资,尤其是相关区大招聘的工人,根据表现，区域金融能够在区域内取得成功。
{"title":"OTONOMI DAERAH DAN PELUANG INVESTASI UNTUK PERCEPATAN PEMBANGUNAN","authors":"Bambang Sugianto, Dita Kurniawati, Zakaria Abbas","doi":"10.46839/lljih.v0i0.286","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v0i0.286","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000 \u0000Tujuan Otonomi daerah memberikan kemudahan daerah dalam melaksanakan kewenangan, sehingga dalam menjalankan kewenangan membawak efek positif dalam berinvestasi. Investasi bertujuan untuk peningkatan ekonomi masyarakat daerah serta peningkatan Pendapatan Daerah, tetapi otonomi sering disalahgunakan oleh Pemerintah daerah terutama yang berhubungan dengan perizinan, sehingga Investor mengalami kesulitan dan hambatan. Tujuan otonomi daerah supaya ada dampak positif serta memberi pelayan publik lebih mudah dan cepat, penyederhanaan Pelayanan Kegiatan Investasi, dan penyederhanaan (regulasi) pelayanan kegiatan ekonomi membantu kelancaran usaha dari para pelaku ekonomi, karena deregulasi dipandang untuk meningkatkan efisiensi bagi pelaku ekonomi. Adanya kepastian proses adminitrasi dan kepastian hukum yang dapat menjamin keamanan dan stabilitas politik Daerah, singkronisasi regulasi antar pemerintah daerah dengan pemerintah pusat, Daerah harus membuka diri dan mempermudah perizinan sektor investasi terutama berhubungan rekruitmen tenaga kerja yang besar, terukurnya kemampuan keuangan daerah dalam era otonomi daerah dengan menggunakan kinerja fiscal sehingga tercapainya keberhasilan daerah dalam menjalani otonomi daerah. \u0000 \u0000Kata Kunci: Otonomi Daerah, Investasi. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000In doing investment, there are often problems, one of which is regional autonomy, the challenges of implementing investment in Indonesia in the era of regional autonomy in Indonesia. In its regulation, there is a system of division of authority in facilitating the entry of investments with the investment arrangements at the regional level referring to investment regulations at the national level. Therefore, although the direction of Indonesian economy after Regional Autonomy refers to the economy in the region, it must be remembered that the authority of regional autonomy towards regional independence remains within the framework of the unitary state. The direction of the investment policy and the increase in business activities through investment policies are expected to create opportunities for the growth and development of the business world for every large, medium, and small scale of economic actor. Simplification of Investment Services, Simplification (deregulation) economic activity services helps accelerate the operation of economic actors, because deregulation is seen to increase efficiency for economic actors. The certainty of the administrative process and legal certainty that can guarantee the security and political stability of the region, synchronization of regulations between the local government and the central government, faster in licensing and the realization of certainty, the regional government must open up and facilitate licensing of the investment sector, especially related to the large recruitment of workers, measurable regional financial capacity in the era of regional autonomy by using performance so that the regional achievement can successful","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123085645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Kebijakan Otononi Daerah sudah dipraktikan sejak lama, sehingga di era otonmi daerah saat ini, ternyata Pemerintah di perintahkan agar menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan wajib yaitu desentralisasi lingkungan hidup secara efektif. Namun ditengah-tengah situasi pandemi Covid-19 seperti saat ini, kebijakan tersebut belum terealisasi dengan baik. Oleh sebab itu, Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada kebijakan desentralisasi lingkungan hidup di tengah pandemi Covid-19, serta bentuk partisipasi masyarakat. Metode penelitian berisifat normatif yang mengggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual untuk menganalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjakan bahwa, kebijakan desentralisasi lingkungan hidup merupakan urusan pemerintahan konkuren yang bersifat wajib untuk dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah, tetapi sejak ada pandemi Covid-19 belum berjalan dengan baik dikarenakan pemerintah sibuk menangani Covid-19 dan pemulihan ekonomi. Padahal menjaga kesehatan lingkungan merupakan bagian dari kebijakan menjaga kesehatan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, ditengah-tengah pandemi saat ini pemerintah tidak boleh mengesampingkan apalagi mengabaikan kesehatan lingkungan. Dengan demikian, untuk menghasilkan kesehatan lingkungan yang baik, maka perlu di dukung oleh partisipasi masyarakat demi menciptakan lingkungan yang sehat. Kata Kunci : Otonomi Daerah, Lingkungan Hidup, Covid-19 Abstract The Regional Autonomy Policy has been practiced for a long time, so that in the current era of regional autonomy, it turns out that the Government is instructed to carry out mandatory governmental affairs namely environmental decentralization effectively. However, in the midst of the current Covid-19 pandemic situation, the policy has not been realized well. Therefore, this research focuses on the policy of environmental decentralization amid the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as forms of community participation. The research method is normative which uses the statutory approach and conceptual approach to analyze qualitatively. The results of the study show that the environmental decentralization policy is a concurrent governmental obligation that is mandatory to be carried out by the Central Government and Regional Governments, but since the Covid-19 pandemic has not gone well because the government is busy handling Covid-19 and economic recovery. Though maintaining environmental health is part of the policy of maintaining public health. Therefore, in the midst of the current pandemic the government must not rule out let alone ignore environmental health. Thus, to produce good environmental health, it is necessary to be supported by community participation to create a healthy environment.
从理论上讲，区域自治政策一直是一种古老的实践，因此在目前的地区自治时代，政府发现有义务管理有效分散环境的事务。但是，在目前的Covid-19大流行情况下，这些政策还没有得到很好的实现。因此,这项研究侧重于权力下放政策环境中间Covid-19流行病,以及公民参与形式。采用宪法方法和概念性分析方法的规范性研究方法。研究结果menunjakan,分散的环境政策是政府事务的konkuren一定要由中央政府和地方政府,但自从Covid-19流行病没有顺利是因为政府忙于处理Covid-19和经济复苏。同时，保护环境健康是公共卫生政策的一部分。因此，在目前的流行病中，政府不能排除更不用说忽视环境卫生的可能性。从而,使健康的环境,因此需要在公民参与的支持,为了创造一个健康的环境。关键词:环境、地区自治Covid-19抽象的政策自主性——已被practiced区域很长时间,所以那个时代》当前区域的自主性,它生出来这就是带出来的政府是要求mandatory governmental事务namely环境decentralization effectively。midst》,但是,在当前Covid-19流行战况,《政策》已经不是已经过去的时候好。这就是环境政策》,这个研究focuses on decentralization Covid-19流行,as well as forms》在社区参与。《statutory研究方法是normative哪种利用进近和conceptual接近的地方to analyze qualitatively。《环境decentralization results of The study秀那policy is a concurrent governmental抵押就是mandatory to be carried out by中央政府和地区Governments,但自从《Covid-19流行已经不走了吧,因为政府是忙处理Covid-19和经济复苏。虽然maintaining环境卫生是maintaining public health)之政策的一部分。这就是midst》,在当前流行的政府必须不是规则出来让人忽视环境卫生。因此,对农产品好环境卫生是必要的,it has to be supported by社区参与创建百万健康环境。
{"title":"IMPLEMENTASI DESENTRALISASI LINGKUNGAN DITENGAH PANDEMI COVID-19 “ANTARA” PELESTARIAN ATAUKAH PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN","authors":"Madaskolay Viktoris Dahoklory, Aminah Aminah","doi":"10.46839/lljih.v0i0.206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v0i0.206","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000 \u0000Kebijakan Otononi Daerah sudah dipraktikan sejak lama, sehingga di era otonmi daerah saat ini, ternyata Pemerintah di perintahkan agar menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan wajib yaitu desentralisasi lingkungan hidup secara efektif. Namun ditengah-tengah situasi pandemi Covid-19 seperti saat ini, kebijakan tersebut belum terealisasi dengan baik. Oleh sebab itu, Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada kebijakan desentralisasi lingkungan hidup di tengah pandemi Covid-19, serta bentuk partisipasi masyarakat. Metode penelitian berisifat normatif yang mengggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual untuk menganalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjakan bahwa, kebijakan desentralisasi lingkungan hidup merupakan urusan pemerintahan konkuren yang bersifat wajib untuk dilaksanakan oleh Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah, tetapi sejak ada pandemi Covid-19 belum berjalan dengan baik dikarenakan pemerintah sibuk menangani Covid-19 dan pemulihan ekonomi. Padahal menjaga kesehatan lingkungan merupakan bagian dari kebijakan menjaga kesehatan masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, ditengah-tengah pandemi saat ini pemerintah tidak boleh mengesampingkan apalagi mengabaikan kesehatan lingkungan. Dengan demikian, untuk menghasilkan kesehatan lingkungan yang baik, maka perlu di dukung oleh partisipasi masyarakat demi menciptakan lingkungan yang sehat. \u0000 \u0000Kata Kunci : Otonomi Daerah, Lingkungan Hidup, Covid-19 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000The Regional Autonomy Policy has been practiced for a long time, so that in the current era of regional autonomy, it turns out that the Government is instructed to carry out mandatory governmental affairs namely environmental decentralization effectively. However, in the midst of the current Covid-19 pandemic situation, the policy has not been realized well. Therefore, this research focuses on the policy of environmental decentralization amid the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as forms of community participation. The research method is normative which uses the statutory approach and conceptual approach to analyze qualitatively. The results of the study show that the environmental decentralization policy is a concurrent governmental obligation that is mandatory to be carried out by the Central Government and Regional Governments, but since the Covid-19 pandemic has not gone well because the government is busy handling Covid-19 and economic recovery. Though maintaining environmental health is part of the policy of maintaining public health. Therefore, in the midst of the current pandemic the government must not rule out let alone ignore environmental health. Thus, to produce good environmental health, it is necessary to be supported by community participation to create a healthy environment.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127597841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstrak Kebijakan monopoli terhadap kegiatan usaha yang dilakukan BUMN seperti yang diamanahkan oleh konstitusi dan peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia dilandasi dengan tujuan untuk mensejahterakan rakyat Indonesia secara adil dan merata. Sedangkan kebijakan demonopolisasi terhadap BUMN dilakukan oleh pemerintah atas dasar tuntutan globalisasi demi menciptakan kondisi pasar persaingan sempurna, efisiensi serta efektifitas dalam pengelolaan korporasi. Pilihan antara monopoli atau demonopolisasi terhadap BUMN merupakan kebijakan yang harus dapat diputuskan oleh pemerintah. Atas dasar untuk mencarikan konsep dan solusi kebijakan mengenai penyeimbang antara aspek tuntutan globalisasi dan kedaulatan negara maka dilakukanlah kajian tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian berupa strategi antisipasi yang dapat dipertimbangkan oleh pemerintah dalam menentukan kebijakan yang merupakan gagasan pemikiran kebaruan dengan mengutamakan prinsip-prinsip perekonomian kerakyatan yang sesuai dengan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Penentuan pilihan untuk menetapkan suatu BUMN dapat menjalankan usaha secara monopoli atau justru menerapkan kebijakan demonopolisasi harus mampu diputuskan dengan dasar pertimbangan yang kuat. Hal terpenting adalah memastikan bahwa sistem ekonomi kerakyatan harus mampu diterapkan dalam pelaksanaan kinerja BUMN baik yang melakukan kegiatan usaha secara monopoli maupun demonopolisasi. Kata Kunci: Ekonomi Kerakyatan, Monopoli, Demonopolisasi, BUMN, Indonesia. Abstract The monopoly policy on business activities carried out by State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) as mandated by the Indonesian constitution and regulations, is based on the aim of prospering the people of Indonesia in a just and equitable manner. While the policy of demonopolization of SOEs is carried out by the government based on the demands of globalization in order to create market conditions of fair competition, efficiency and effectiveness in managing the corporation. The choice between monopoly or demonopolization of SOEs is a policy that should be decided by the government. This articles focus on finding policy solutions regarding balancing between the aspects of the demands of globalization and state sovereignty. The study was conducted using desk research (yuridis normative) methods. The results of the research are anticipatory strategies that can be considered by the government in determining policies that are ideas of novelty thinking by prioritizing the principles of popular economy in accordance with the Indonesian Constitution. Determination of the choice to establish an SOEs can run a business monopoly or even implement a policy of demonopolization must be able to be decided on careful and hard consideration. The most important thing is to ensure that the populist economic system must be able to be implemented in the performance of SOEs that conduct monopoly and demonopolization business activities.
根据《宪法》和《印尼宪法》规定的企业活动实施的垄断政策，旨在公平公正地为印尼人民提供福利。而示威政策是政府在全球化的要求下实施的，目的是创造完美竞争市场条件、企业管理效率和有效性。在垄断或对国有企业的民主化之间做出选择，是政府应该做出的政策。在确定全球化要求的各个方面与国家主权之间平衡的政策概念和解决方案的基础上，使用法例研究方法进行研究。这项研究的结果是，各国政府在确定政策时可以考虑的预测策略，该策略将严格的经济原则置于印度尼西亚共和国宪法所规定的前提之上。确定一个企业可以垄断企业，甚至实施民主政策的选择，必须有坚实的判断力来决定。最重要的是，确保严格的经济体系能够实施垄断企业或妖化的企业绩效。关键词:Kerakyatan经济，垄断，恶魔化，国有企业，印度尼西亚。抽象的政策:在商业活动carried out by州立Owned美国企业(国有企业)印尼mandated由《宪法》和prospering regulations,是改编自《aim》people in a只是印尼和衡平法上的态度。当国有企业是carried out policy of demonopolization》由政府提出》改编自殉道全球化》到制造市场秩序条件公平竞赛,新版显示其著作百科全书》在《管理有限公司。国家之间的选择应该由政府来决定。这篇文章专注于寻找政策解决方案，在全球反腐败和主权国家的要求之间建立平衡。研究包括使用desk研究的方法。这项研究的结果是反对政府通过确定政策来考虑的政策，即这种政策是由印度尼西亚宪法中占主导地位的大众经济原则主导的。国家的决定可以是一项单独的业务，甚至实现一项证明政策的政策，必须谨慎和艰难地决定。最重要的事情是，确定人口经济系统的总体表现必须能够实现经济活动的独特性。
{"title":"KONSEP EKONOMI KERAKYATAN PADA PILIHAN KEBIJAKAN MONOPOLI ATAU DEMONOPOLISASI BUMN INDONESIA","authors":"Putu Samawati Saleh","doi":"10.46839/lljih.v0i0.184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v0i0.184","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000 \u0000Kebijakan monopoli terhadap kegiatan usaha yang dilakukan BUMN seperti yang diamanahkan oleh konstitusi dan peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia dilandasi dengan tujuan untuk mensejahterakan rakyat Indonesia secara adil dan merata. Sedangkan kebijakan demonopolisasi terhadap BUMN dilakukan oleh pemerintah atas dasar tuntutan globalisasi demi menciptakan kondisi pasar persaingan sempurna, efisiensi serta efektifitas dalam pengelolaan korporasi. Pilihan antara monopoli atau demonopolisasi terhadap BUMN merupakan kebijakan yang harus dapat diputuskan oleh pemerintah. Atas dasar untuk mencarikan konsep dan solusi kebijakan mengenai penyeimbang antara aspek tuntutan globalisasi dan kedaulatan negara maka dilakukanlah kajian tersebut dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian berupa strategi antisipasi yang dapat dipertimbangkan oleh pemerintah dalam menentukan kebijakan yang merupakan gagasan pemikiran kebaruan dengan mengutamakan prinsip-prinsip perekonomian kerakyatan yang sesuai dengan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Penentuan pilihan untuk menetapkan suatu BUMN dapat menjalankan usaha secara monopoli atau justru menerapkan kebijakan demonopolisasi harus mampu diputuskan dengan dasar pertimbangan yang kuat. Hal terpenting adalah memastikan bahwa sistem ekonomi kerakyatan harus mampu diterapkan dalam pelaksanaan kinerja BUMN baik yang melakukan kegiatan usaha secara monopoli maupun demonopolisasi. \u0000 \u0000Kata Kunci: Ekonomi Kerakyatan, Monopoli, Demonopolisasi, BUMN, Indonesia. \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000The monopoly policy on business activities carried out by State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) as mandated by the Indonesian constitution and regulations, is based on the aim of prospering the people of Indonesia in a just and equitable manner. While the policy of demonopolization of SOEs is carried out by the government based on the demands of globalization in order to create market conditions of fair competition, efficiency and effectiveness in managing the corporation. The choice between monopoly or demonopolization of SOEs is a policy that should be decided by the government. This articles focus on finding policy solutions regarding balancing between the aspects of the demands of globalization and state sovereignty. The study was conducted using desk research (yuridis normative) methods. The results of the research are anticipatory strategies that can be considered by the government in determining policies that are ideas of novelty thinking by prioritizing the principles of popular economy in accordance with the Indonesian Constitution. Determination of the choice to establish an SOEs can run a business monopoly or even implement a policy of demonopolization must be able to be decided on careful and hard consideration. The most important thing is to ensure that the populist economic system must be able to be implemented in the performance of SOEs that conduct monopoly and demonopolization business activities.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"171 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133527413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pemidanaan terhadap pecandu narkotika terdapat dua sisi pandangan dalam aspek penegakan hukumnya. Pecandu narkotika dipandang sebagai korban berdasarkan sudut pandang ilmu kesahatan serta dari aspek hukum karena di dalam UU Narkotika pencandu narkotika dianggap sebagai orang sakit yang perlu mendapatkan rehabilitasi, akan tetapi di dalam kenyataannya seringkali pecandu narkotika diperlakukan sebagai penjahat dan dijatuhi hukuman berupa pidana penjara dalam proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini, pemidanaan terhadap pecandu narkotika di Indonesia akan ditinjau berdasarkan aspek tujuan penegakan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yuridis normatif dengan sumber data utama adalah studi kepustakaan. Pendekatan masalah yang digunakan adalah pendekatan teoritis dan analisa putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemidanaan bagi pecandu narkotika di Indonesia tidak sesuai dengan tujuan dari penegakan hukum yaitu keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum. Pemidanaan berupa pidana penjara terhadap pecandu narkotika di Indonesia juga dinilai tidak efektif, karena dinilai tidak mampu memperbaiki para pecandu narkotika maupun menimbulkan dampak positif bagi masyarakat dan negara. Kata kunci: Narkotika, Pecandu Narkotika, Tujuan Penegakan Hukum. Abstract Penalties for narcotics addicts have two sides of view in the aspect of law enforcement. Narcotics addicts are seen as victims from a medical point of view as well as from the legal aspect because in the Narcotics Act narcotics addicts are considered as sick people who need to get rehabilitation, but in reality often narcotics addicts are treated as criminals and sentenced in the form of imprisonment in the enforcement process law in Indonesia. In this study, the punishment of narcotics addicts in Indonesia will be reviewed based on the aspects of law enforcement objectives. The research method used by normative juridical with the main data source is literature study. The problem approach used is the theoretical approach and decision analysis. The results of the research show that criminal punishment for narcotics addicts in Indonesia is not in accordance with the objectives of law enforcement, namely justice, expediency, and legal certainty. The conviction in the form of imprisonment of narcotics addicts in Indonesia is considered ineffective, because it is considered unable to improve narcotics addicts or to have a positive impact on society and the country.
打击吸毒者在执法方面有两个方面。吸毒者被视为受害者根据kesahatan科学和法律方面的观点,因为毒品法案里毒品成瘾者被视为生病的人需要得到康复,然而,在现实中往往是吸毒者视为罪犯,而被判入狱的刑事执法的过程中,印度尼西亚。在这项研究中，针对吸毒者的调查将基于执法的目标。与主要数据来源的规范研究方法是文献研究。问题的方法是理论的方法和判决的分析。研究表明，在印度尼西亚为吸毒者提供毒品并不符合执法的目标——正义、权威性和法律确定性。在印度尼西亚，针对吸毒者的刑罚也被认为是无效的，因为被认为无法改善吸毒者，也无法对社会和国家产生积极的影响。关键词:缉毒，缉毒，执法目的。弃权书addicts有两种观点。麻醉剂成瘾者是美国看到受害者从a medical point of view) as well as从境合法aspect因为麻醉剂法案麻醉剂成瘾者是世卫组织认为美国生病的人需要得到发布攻击性,但在真人经常麻醉剂成瘾者是对美国罪犯和sentenced in the form of囚禁在印度尼西亚执法过程的法律》。在这项研究中，印度尼西亚对毒品成瘾的惩罚将基于法律对客观事实的调查。该研究方法由主要数据来源为文学研究的指导方针使用。常见的问题是理论分析和决定。这项研究的结果表明，印尼犯罪分子对毒品成瘾的惩罚不包括执法、司法、外交和法律上的确定。在印度尼西亚的毒品成瘾形式下的定罪被认为是有效的，因为它被认为是不可接受的毒品成瘾，或者对社会和国家有积极的影响。
{"title":"PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PECANDU NARKOTIKA DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI ASPEK TUJUAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM","authors":"Akwila Arif Athallah, K. Lewoleba","doi":"10.46839/lljih.v0i0.195","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v0i0.195","url":null,"abstract":"Pemidanaan terhadap pecandu narkotika terdapat dua sisi pandangan dalam aspek penegakan hukumnya. Pecandu narkotika dipandang sebagai korban berdasarkan sudut pandang ilmu kesahatan serta dari aspek hukum karena di dalam UU Narkotika pencandu narkotika dianggap sebagai orang sakit yang perlu mendapatkan rehabilitasi, akan tetapi di dalam kenyataannya seringkali pecandu narkotika diperlakukan sebagai penjahat dan dijatuhi hukuman berupa pidana penjara dalam proses penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini, pemidanaan terhadap pecandu narkotika di Indonesia akan ditinjau berdasarkan aspek tujuan penegakan hukum. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yuridis normatif dengan sumber data utama adalah studi kepustakaan. Pendekatan masalah yang digunakan adalah pendekatan teoritis dan analisa putusan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemidanaan bagi pecandu narkotika di Indonesia tidak sesuai dengan tujuan dari penegakan hukum yaitu keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum. Pemidanaan berupa pidana penjara terhadap pecandu narkotika di Indonesia juga dinilai tidak efektif, karena dinilai tidak mampu memperbaiki para pecandu narkotika maupun menimbulkan dampak positif bagi masyarakat dan negara. \u0000 \u0000Kata kunci: Narkotika, Pecandu Narkotika, Tujuan Penegakan Hukum. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000Penalties for narcotics addicts have two sides of view in the aspect of law enforcement. Narcotics addicts are seen as victims from a medical point of view as well as from the legal aspect because in the Narcotics Act narcotics addicts are considered as sick people who need to get rehabilitation, but in reality often narcotics addicts are treated as criminals and sentenced in the form of imprisonment in the enforcement process law in Indonesia. In this study, the punishment of narcotics addicts in Indonesia will be reviewed based on the aspects of law enforcement objectives. The research method used by normative juridical with the main data source is literature study. The problem approach used is the theoretical approach and decision analysis. The results of the research show that criminal punishment for narcotics addicts in Indonesia is not in accordance with the objectives of law enforcement, namely justice, expediency, and legal certainty. The conviction in the form of imprisonment of narcotics addicts in Indonesia is considered ineffective, because it is considered unable to improve narcotics addicts or to have a positive impact on society and the country.","PeriodicalId":126775,"journal":{"name":"Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"310 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132486112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：