{"title":"Between Cunning and Chaos","authors":"E. Bracke","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198810803.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the tension running through the nine editions by focusing on the development of one particular entry, that for μῆτις. This term is best known from the 1974 book by Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant, Les ruses de l’intelligence: la métis des Grecs, still widely regarded as authoritative The ambiguity inherent in ruses—also present in the English title ‘cunning intelligence’—stands in contrast to LSJ’s broader definition as, firstly, ‘wisdom, skill, craft’, and, secondly, ‘counsel, plan, undertaking’. The chapter therefore sets out to explore both the intratextual tensions within the various editions of Liddell and Scott as well as the outward tensions between the Lexicon and contemporary scholarship.","PeriodicalId":145473,"journal":{"name":"Liddell and Scott","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liddell and Scott","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810803.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter explores the tension running through the nine editions by focusing on the development of one particular entry, that for μῆτις. This term is best known from the 1974 book by Marcel Detienne and Jean-Pierre Vernant, Les ruses de l’intelligence: la métis des Grecs, still widely regarded as authoritative The ambiguity inherent in ruses—also present in the English title ‘cunning intelligence’—stands in contrast to LSJ’s broader definition as, firstly, ‘wisdom, skill, craft’, and, secondly, ‘counsel, plan, undertaking’. The chapter therefore sets out to explore both the intratextual tensions within the various editions of Liddell and Scott as well as the outward tensions between the Lexicon and contemporary scholarship.
本章通过关注一个特定条目的发展来探讨贯穿九个版本的紧张关系，即μ τις (ς))。这个词最为人所知的是1974年Marcel Detienne和Jean-Pierre Vernant所著的《Les ruses del ' intelligence: la m tis des希腊人》，这本书至今仍被广泛认为是权威的。“诡计”固有的模糊性——也出现在英文标题“狡猾的情报”中——与LSJ更广泛的定义形成鲜明对比，首先是“智慧、技能、工艺”，其次是“建议、计划、事业”。因此，本章开始探索在利德尔和斯科特的不同版本的文本内的紧张关系，以及词典和当代学术之间的外部紧张关系。
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
