Effectiveness comparison of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models toward the fact-finding skill on plantae material

Galuh Arga Wisnu Saputra, B. Subali
{"title":"Effectiveness comparison of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models toward the fact-finding skill on plantae material","authors":"Galuh Arga Wisnu Saputra, B. Subali","doi":"10.26555/BIOEDUKATIKA.V7I2.12547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to discover the differences in learning outcomes of fact-finding in the implementation of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models on plantae material at X grade of National 1 High School of Jetis Bantul. This research was conducted on experimental group class that carried out learning with guided discovery and the control class with semi-guided discovery learning. The design of this research was the randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The quantitative data were the learning outcomes of cognitive domain which obtained from the values of pretest and posttest, that analyzed through T test at 5% significance level. Based on the test, it was obtained p=0.000 (p<0.05) so there was a significant difference between the guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning model toward the fact-finding skill on the learning outcomes of student. The fact-finding skills of guided discovery was higher than semi-guided discovery learning with pretest average of control class students (41.53) and the experimental class (41.97), while the postest average of control class (69.75) and experimental class (80.66). The learning through the implementation of guided discovery learning model was more effective than semi-guided discovery learning model toward fact-finding skill.","PeriodicalId":391106,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/BIOEDUKATIKA.V7I2.12547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to discover the differences in learning outcomes of fact-finding in the implementation of guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning models on plantae material at X grade of National 1 High School of Jetis Bantul. This research was conducted on experimental group class that carried out learning with guided discovery and the control class with semi-guided discovery learning. The design of this research was the randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The quantitative data were the learning outcomes of cognitive domain which obtained from the values of pretest and posttest, that analyzed through T test at 5% significance level. Based on the test, it was obtained p=0.000 (p<0.05) so there was a significant difference between the guided discovery and semi-guided discovery learning model toward the fact-finding skill on the learning outcomes of student. The fact-finding skills of guided discovery was higher than semi-guided discovery learning with pretest average of control class students (41.53) and the experimental class (41.97), while the postest average of control class (69.75) and experimental class (80.66). The learning through the implementation of guided discovery learning model was more effective than semi-guided discovery learning model toward fact-finding skill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导式发现与半引导式发现学习模式对植物材料事实发现技能的效果比较
本研究旨在探讨Jetis Bantul国一中学X年级学生在实施植物材料引导式发现和半引导式发现学习模式时,事实发现学习效果的差异。本研究采用引导式发现学习的实验组和半引导式发现学习的对照组。本研究采用随机前测后测对照组设计。定量数据为认知领域的学习结果,由前测和后测所得,通过5%显著性水平的T检验进行分析。经检验,得到p=0.000 (p<0.05),说明引导式发现和半引导式发现学习模式对学生事实发现技能的学习效果有显著差异。引导式发现的事实发现技能高于半引导式发现学习,前测平均值为41.53,实验班为41.97,后测平均值为69.75,实验班为80.66。实施引导式发现学习模式对事实发现技能的学习效果优于半引导式发现学习模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revealing the relationship between acceptance and understanding of evolution through NOS (Nature of Science)-based learning Field trips based on a focused strategy to stimulate the improvement of students' problem-solving skills on ecosystem materials Critical thinking and representation skills of biology students: Are they related? Guided inquiry model assisted HOTS-Based worksheet for critical thinking ability in online learning during pandemic covid-19 Citizen science project’s contributions to species literacy for pre-service biology teacher
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1