University environment and its influence on the development of the student's personality: actualization of the problem from the standpoint of the philosophical and competence approaches

V. Ryabchenko
{"title":"University environment and its influence on the development of the student's personality: actualization of the problem from the standpoint of the philosophical and competence approaches","authors":"V. Ryabchenko","doi":"10.31874/2520-6702-2018-6-2-72-116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the problem of how university environment influences student’s personality development from the standpoint of philosophical-competent approach. Validated that this problem is both large, complex and extremely socially significant on university, local and global levels. It needs a permanent solution, because every new generation of students is different from the previous generation. Each new generation faces new challenges while stepping to their professional career. The difference between these challenges was not as significant and not that much socially implying in the past. Nowaday challenges, that should be responded in adequacy with the high-graduate professional, are clear and could be even pattern-breaking not only in 5-year education period, but even between year-to-year graduates. \nThe ideological competence as the ability of specialists with higher education is determined corresponding to their own outlook to the social statuses and roles that they embrace and carry out. Attention is drawn to the fact that the world-view competence is the determining factor in general competence. The fact that modern civilization accelerates into the global ecology crisis proves the lack of ideological competence of post-graduate individuals. After all, they are the main subject of life transformation backed with intelligence and the most advanced achievements of science and technical progress. Proposed to consider the global human competence as it’s endangered and synergistic ability to halt the global ecological crisis and ensure sustainable civilization development. Explained that global competence is possible only if it’s subjects will be ruled by values that have a positive correlation with principles of sustainable development. Promotion of such values should be facilitated in university environment where individuals considered as future life changers are getting their degrees. Attention is paid on the importance of basic principles of ideological competence development (morality and social responsibility). Proved that it can be achieved only if conditions of an academically virtuous and democratic university environment are met. Substantiated that one of the effective methods to create such conditions should be launching effective governance mechanisms to university activities management. The emphasis is put on authoritarianism that blocks personal freedom in many domestic institutions, resulting in the lack of personal responsibility skills. It’s impossible to develop a responsible citizen without proper freedom conditions, only slave can be an option. For the adequate understanding of complexity and diversity of the extraordinary social impact of university environment on student’s identity under the conditions of social and global challenges author performed a critic analysis of national higher education insitution’s ability to deal with this issue through the prism of the following contradictions: 1) Technical and social development or science and technical progress and social evolution; 2) Competence criteria on local levels and global competence requirements; 3) The current crisis of classic universities and global challenges of technogenic civilization that graduates should deal with; 4) National university status devaluation in Ukraine and the urgent need to boost national competitiveness; 5) Virtualization and education process distancing from university environment and ever-increasing requirements to humanity of graduates. \nIn the process of critical analysis through the prism of contradictions described above the challenges on global, social, and university levels were identified, and individuals with higher education should respond to these with competence. Suggested to use these challenges as a peculiar matrix to make the assessment for each given higher education institution to prepare such individuals and determine their prospective ability to further development and existence.","PeriodicalId":150572,"journal":{"name":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31874/2520-6702-2018-6-2-72-116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article focuses on the problem of how university environment influences student’s personality development from the standpoint of philosophical-competent approach. Validated that this problem is both large, complex and extremely socially significant on university, local and global levels. It needs a permanent solution, because every new generation of students is different from the previous generation. Each new generation faces new challenges while stepping to their professional career. The difference between these challenges was not as significant and not that much socially implying in the past. Nowaday challenges, that should be responded in adequacy with the high-graduate professional, are clear and could be even pattern-breaking not only in 5-year education period, but even between year-to-year graduates. The ideological competence as the ability of specialists with higher education is determined corresponding to their own outlook to the social statuses and roles that they embrace and carry out. Attention is drawn to the fact that the world-view competence is the determining factor in general competence. The fact that modern civilization accelerates into the global ecology crisis proves the lack of ideological competence of post-graduate individuals. After all, they are the main subject of life transformation backed with intelligence and the most advanced achievements of science and technical progress. Proposed to consider the global human competence as it’s endangered and synergistic ability to halt the global ecological crisis and ensure sustainable civilization development. Explained that global competence is possible only if it’s subjects will be ruled by values that have a positive correlation with principles of sustainable development. Promotion of such values should be facilitated in university environment where individuals considered as future life changers are getting their degrees. Attention is paid on the importance of basic principles of ideological competence development (morality and social responsibility). Proved that it can be achieved only if conditions of an academically virtuous and democratic university environment are met. Substantiated that one of the effective methods to create such conditions should be launching effective governance mechanisms to university activities management. The emphasis is put on authoritarianism that blocks personal freedom in many domestic institutions, resulting in the lack of personal responsibility skills. It’s impossible to develop a responsible citizen without proper freedom conditions, only slave can be an option. For the adequate understanding of complexity and diversity of the extraordinary social impact of university environment on student’s identity under the conditions of social and global challenges author performed a critic analysis of national higher education insitution’s ability to deal with this issue through the prism of the following contradictions: 1) Technical and social development or science and technical progress and social evolution; 2) Competence criteria on local levels and global competence requirements; 3) The current crisis of classic universities and global challenges of technogenic civilization that graduates should deal with; 4) National university status devaluation in Ukraine and the urgent need to boost national competitiveness; 5) Virtualization and education process distancing from university environment and ever-increasing requirements to humanity of graduates. In the process of critical analysis through the prism of contradictions described above the challenges on global, social, and university levels were identified, and individuals with higher education should respond to these with competence. Suggested to use these challenges as a peculiar matrix to make the assessment for each given higher education institution to prepare such individuals and determine their prospective ability to further development and existence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学环境及其对学生人格发展的影响:哲学与能力取向视角下问题的实现
本文从哲学能力观的角度探讨了大学环境对学生人格发展的影响。这个问题既大又复杂,在大学、地方和全球层面上都具有极其重要的社会意义。这需要一个永久性的解决方案,因为每一代新学生都与上一代不同。每一代新人在步入职业生涯的过程中都会面临新的挑战。在过去,这些挑战之间的区别并没有那么显著,也没有那么多的社会暗示。如今的挑战是明确的,而且不仅在五年制教育期间,甚至在每年的毕业生之间,都可能打破模式,这些挑战应该与高等毕业生的专业人员充分应对。作为高等教育专业人才的思想能力,是与其自身所具有的社会地位和社会角色观相适应的。研究发现,世界观能力是一般能力的决定性因素。现代文明加速进入全球生态危机的事实,证明了研究生个体思想能力的缺失。毕竟,他们是以智能和科技进步的最先进成果为后盾的生命改造的主体。提出考虑全球人类的濒危能力和协同能力,以制止全球生态危机,确保文明可持续发展。解释了全球竞争力只有在其主体被与可持续发展原则正相关的价值观所统治时才有可能。这些价值观的推广应该在大学环境中得到促进,因为那些被认为是未来生活改变者的人正在获得学位。重视思想能力建设基本原则(道德和社会责任)的重要性。事实证明,只有具备学术道德和民主的大学环境条件,才能实现这一目标。实践证明,建立有效的高校活动管理治理机制是创造这种条件的有效途径之一。在许多国内机构中,强调的是阻碍个人自由的威权主义,导致个人责任技能的缺乏。没有适当的自由条件,培养一个负责任的公民是不可能的,只有奴隶才能成为一种选择。为了充分认识在社会和全球挑战的条件下,大学环境对学生身份的特殊社会影响的复杂性和多样性,作者通过以下矛盾的棱镜对国家高等教育机构应对这一问题的能力进行了批判性分析:1)技术与社会发展或科技进步与社会演变;2)地方层面的能力标准和全球能力要求;3)经典大学当前面临的危机和毕业生应应对的全球性科技文明挑战;4)乌克兰国立大学地位贬值,急需提升国家竞争力;5)虚拟化和教育过程与大学环境的距离以及对毕业生人性化要求的不断提高。在通过上述矛盾棱镜进行批判性分析的过程中,确定了全球,社会和大学层面的挑战,受过高等教育的个人应该以能力应对这些挑战。建议将这些挑战作为一个特殊的矩阵,对每个特定的高等教育机构进行评估,以培养这些个人,并确定他们进一步发展和存在的未来能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
World Experience in the Implementation of Social Responsibility of Universities The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Designing and creating MOOCs: the experience of the University of Bayreuth Benchmarking of the European and Ukrainian Practice of Applying a Personalised Approach to Learning Problem Issues and Models of Professional Qualifications Assignment by Higher Education Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1