Russian Foreign Energy Policy Towards the European Union

Riley Black
{"title":"Russian Foreign Energy Policy Towards the European Union","authors":"Riley Black","doi":"10.18192/potentia.v11i0.4568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a long history of cooperation, Russia's energy policy towards the European Union has recently been the subject of great consternation amongst scholars and policymakers due to the gas disputes of 2006 and 2009. In addition to European efforts aimed at liberalizing its internal energy market, the looming expiry of the latest Russia-Ukraine gas transit agreement has raised concerns about Russia's potential use of the 'energy weapon,' or more simply its ability to compel European policymakers to acquiesce to various Russian demands through the threat of shutting off gas exports to Europe. Ultimately, I find that this scenario is highly unlikely in the near future, as Russia's foreign energy policy towards the European Union is characterized by a diverse range of interests that largely revolve around achieving security of demand. As such, both the Russian state and Gazprom are significantly limited in their ability to exercise influence over the European Union through natural gas exports, as attempting to do so would jeopardize their domestic political and commercial interests. Moreover, market liberalization in both EU and Russian natural gas markets have weakened the overtly geopolitical aspects of Russia’s energy policy towards the European Union.","PeriodicalId":223759,"journal":{"name":"Potentia: Journal of International Affairs","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potentia: Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18192/potentia.v11i0.4568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a long history of cooperation, Russia's energy policy towards the European Union has recently been the subject of great consternation amongst scholars and policymakers due to the gas disputes of 2006 and 2009. In addition to European efforts aimed at liberalizing its internal energy market, the looming expiry of the latest Russia-Ukraine gas transit agreement has raised concerns about Russia's potential use of the 'energy weapon,' or more simply its ability to compel European policymakers to acquiesce to various Russian demands through the threat of shutting off gas exports to Europe. Ultimately, I find that this scenario is highly unlikely in the near future, as Russia's foreign energy policy towards the European Union is characterized by a diverse range of interests that largely revolve around achieving security of demand. As such, both the Russian state and Gazprom are significantly limited in their ability to exercise influence over the European Union through natural gas exports, as attempting to do so would jeopardize their domestic political and commercial interests. Moreover, market liberalization in both EU and Russian natural gas markets have weakened the overtly geopolitical aspects of Russia’s energy policy towards the European Union.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯对欧盟的对外能源政策
尽管有着悠久的合作历史,但由于2006年和2009年的天然气争端,俄罗斯对欧盟的能源政策最近一直是学者和政策制定者惊愕的主题。除了欧洲旨在开放其内部能源市场的努力之外,俄罗斯与乌克兰最新的天然气过境协议即将到期,也引发了人们对俄罗斯可能使用“能源武器”的担忧,或者更简单地说,俄罗斯有能力通过威胁切断对欧洲的天然气出口,迫使欧洲政策制定者默许俄罗斯的各种要求。最终,我发现这种情况在不久的将来是极不可能的,因为俄罗斯对欧盟的对外能源政策的特点是各种各样的利益,主要围绕着实现需求安全。因此,俄罗斯政府和俄罗斯天然气工业股份公司通过天然气出口对欧盟施加影响的能力都受到严重限制,因为试图这样做会危及它们的国内政治和商业利益。此外,欧盟和俄罗斯天然气市场的市场自由化削弱了俄罗斯对欧盟能源政策中明显的地缘政治因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problems with Nature-Based Solutions Normative Evolution of Gender-Based Crimes Against Humanity An Insecure North? Redefining Violence against Women and Framing Issues L’autodétermination : de la difficile naissance à l’impossible application du droit par les Nations Unies ?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1