Exploring the Drifting Behavior on Different Social Media

Wei-Lun Chang, Cheng Li, Hao Chun Ting
{"title":"Exploring the Drifting Behavior on Different Social Media","authors":"Wei-Lun Chang, Cheng Li, Hao Chun Ting","doi":"10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2014.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facebook and LINE are the two popular social media in Taiwan. This research aims to understand users' behavior(features) and strong/weak ties within the social network as well as if users have been drifted on two social media. We used social network analysis (UCINET) to analyze the features of users and the motivation of drifting on two platforms. Three indicators were also used: degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality. The findings revealed users who had highest value of centralities did not drift from Facebook to LINE. Additionally, users have less usage on Facebook may prefer LINE more. Although many users (especially young people) use LINE very often in Taiwan, the results showed no obvious evidence to drift from Facebook to LINE. The frequency to use two social media is similar according to the outcomes of three centralities.","PeriodicalId":432222,"journal":{"name":"2014 IIAI 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IIAI 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2014.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Facebook and LINE are the two popular social media in Taiwan. This research aims to understand users' behavior(features) and strong/weak ties within the social network as well as if users have been drifted on two social media. We used social network analysis (UCINET) to analyze the features of users and the motivation of drifting on two platforms. Three indicators were also used: degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality. The findings revealed users who had highest value of centralities did not drift from Facebook to LINE. Additionally, users have less usage on Facebook may prefer LINE more. Although many users (especially young people) use LINE very often in Taiwan, the results showed no obvious evidence to drift from Facebook to LINE. The frequency to use two social media is similar according to the outcomes of three centralities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究不同社交媒体上的漂移行为
Facebook和LINE是台湾两大流行的社交媒体。本研究旨在了解用户在社交网络中的行为(特征)和强弱关系,以及用户是否在两个社交媒体上漂泊。我们使用社交网络分析(social network analysis, UCINET)分析了两个平台上的用户特征和漂移动机。还使用了三个指标:度中心性、中间中心性和接近中心性。研究结果显示,中心性值最高的用户并没有从Facebook转向LINE。此外,较少使用Facebook的用户可能更喜欢LINE。尽管许多台湾用户(尤其是年轻人)经常使用LINE,但结果显示没有明显的证据表明人们从Facebook转向LINE。根据三个中心性的结果,使用两种社交媒体的频率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Firm's Mimetic Isomorphic Behaviors on Customer Satisfaction from the Perspectives of Expectation Theory and Self-Determination Theory: An Approach of Hierarchical Linear Modeling Data Mining for Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated with Overweight and Obesity among Adolescents The Two-Stage Analog Neural Network Model and Hardware Implementation Experience Formalized as a Service for Geographical and Temporal Remote Collaboration A Supporting System for Finding Lost Objects for Dementia Patient and Caregiver by Image Recognition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1