Symmetric Ignorance: The Cost of Anonymous Lemons

A. Bhide
{"title":"Symmetric Ignorance: The Cost of Anonymous Lemons","authors":"A. Bhide","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3439105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rules that restrict information required in negotiated private transactions have spurred a vast increase in the scope of anonymous financial markets, particularly in the US. The subtle costs of the information restricting rules raise questions about the social value of “completing” anonymous markets that would not naturally survive and did not historically exist.","PeriodicalId":263020,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Information Asymmetry (Sub-Topic)","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Information Asymmetry (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3439105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Rules that restrict information required in negotiated private transactions have spurred a vast increase in the scope of anonymous financial markets, particularly in the US. The subtle costs of the information restricting rules raise questions about the social value of “completing” anonymous markets that would not naturally survive and did not historically exist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对称无知:匿名柠檬的代价
限制私下谈判交易所需信息的规定,已促使匿名金融市场的规模大幅扩大,尤其是在美国。信息限制规则的微妙成本引发了人们对“完善”匿名市场的社会价值的质疑,这种市场不会自然存在,历史上也不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symmetric Ignorance: The Cost of Anonymous Lemons Crowdfunding, Efficiency, and Inequality Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending Multi-Stage Investment, Long-Term Asymmetric Information and Pecking Order Revisited Optimal Sharing Rules in Repeated Partnerships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1