Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending

Craig R. Everett
{"title":"Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending","authors":"Craig R. Everett","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1114428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses a new data source, online social lending (a.k.a. peer-to-peer lending), to help answer the question of what impact borrower-lender information asymmetries have on adverse selection, moral hazard and the hold-up problem. The hold-up problem refers to when lenders with private positive information do not pass long the savings associated with lower borrower risk to the borrower. The results indicate that the hold-up problem is more severe with private lenders than public lenders, and that personal relationships can mitigate the moral hazard problem. This data source has characteristics such as group membership that allow analysis of the public (outsider) versus private (insider) debt choice without some of the endogeneity issues that are present when using other data sources. Each loan contains detailed bidding information from both public and private investors. Thus, a clean distinction can be drawn between public and private debt without the potential problem of unobserved borrower risk characteristics.","PeriodicalId":263020,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Information Asymmetry (Sub-Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"142","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Information Asymmetry (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1114428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 142

Abstract

This paper uses a new data source, online social lending (a.k.a. peer-to-peer lending), to help answer the question of what impact borrower-lender information asymmetries have on adverse selection, moral hazard and the hold-up problem. The hold-up problem refers to when lenders with private positive information do not pass long the savings associated with lower borrower risk to the borrower. The results indicate that the hold-up problem is more severe with private lenders than public lenders, and that personal relationships can mitigate the moral hazard problem. This data source has characteristics such as group membership that allow analysis of the public (outsider) versus private (insider) debt choice without some of the endogeneity issues that are present when using other data sources. Each loan contains detailed bidding information from both public and private investors. Thus, a clean distinction can be drawn between public and private debt without the potential problem of unobserved borrower risk characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组成员、关系银行与贷款违约风险:以网络社交借贷为例
本文使用一种新的数据来源——网络社交借贷(又名p2p借贷),来帮助回答借款人和贷款人信息不对称对逆向选择、道德风险和拖延问题的影响。拖延问题指的是,拥有私人积极信息的贷款人不会长期将与较低借款人风险相关的储蓄传递给借款人。结果表明,与公共贷款机构相比,私人贷款机构的拖延问题更为严重,人际关系可以缓解道德风险问题。该数据源具有组成员等特征,允许分析公共(外部)与私人(内部)债务选择,而不存在使用其他数据源时出现的一些内生性问题。每笔贷款都包含来自公共和私人投资者的详细竞标信息。因此,可以明确区分公共债务和私人债务,而不会出现未观察到借款人风险特征的潜在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symmetric Ignorance: The Cost of Anonymous Lemons Crowdfunding, Efficiency, and Inequality Group Membership, Relationship Banking and Loan Default Risk: The Case of Online Social Lending Multi-Stage Investment, Long-Term Asymmetric Information and Pecking Order Revisited Optimal Sharing Rules in Repeated Partnerships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1