{"title":"Less Human, More Ourselves: Michel Houellebecq's Neohumans and the Anthropocene subject","authors":"Patricia Malone","doi":"10.16995/C21.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores the way in which Michel Houellebecq’s literary depictions of a genetically modified ‘human’ race, described as ‘neohumans’, articulate the distress of the Anthropocene subject and explore the evolution of subjectivity in a techno-natural context. Considering Houellebecq’s work in an ecocritical context, this essay seeks to expand current readings of the author in order to illuminate the implications of his vision of the self-reflexive Anthropocene subject. It seeks to explore how creation myths evolve in the Anthropocene era and what it means for humans to act on themselves in this context. This also opens up questions around the framing of our current epoch as ‘Anthropocene’, and seeks to examine, through Houellebecq’s account, the pessimism of this understanding, and the myth of human exceptionalism that underpins it. Focusing on Atomised (2000) and The Possibility of an Island (2006), I seek to illuminate Houellebecq’s gestures towards an Anthropocene sensibility, and to assess his accounts of self-negation at subject and species level with regard to the concept of ‘shadowtime, defined as ‘the sense of living in two or more orders of temporal scale simultaneously’. Further, it seeks to question the role of literature in addressing these concerns, positing the emergence of a contemporary literature of ‘futurised presents’ (J. G. Ballard’s ‘next five minutes’), of which Houellebecq’s work is part.","PeriodicalId":272809,"journal":{"name":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This essay explores the way in which Michel Houellebecq’s literary depictions of a genetically modified ‘human’ race, described as ‘neohumans’, articulate the distress of the Anthropocene subject and explore the evolution of subjectivity in a techno-natural context. Considering Houellebecq’s work in an ecocritical context, this essay seeks to expand current readings of the author in order to illuminate the implications of his vision of the self-reflexive Anthropocene subject. It seeks to explore how creation myths evolve in the Anthropocene era and what it means for humans to act on themselves in this context. This also opens up questions around the framing of our current epoch as ‘Anthropocene’, and seeks to examine, through Houellebecq’s account, the pessimism of this understanding, and the myth of human exceptionalism that underpins it. Focusing on Atomised (2000) and The Possibility of an Island (2006), I seek to illuminate Houellebecq’s gestures towards an Anthropocene sensibility, and to assess his accounts of self-negation at subject and species level with regard to the concept of ‘shadowtime, defined as ‘the sense of living in two or more orders of temporal scale simultaneously’. Further, it seeks to question the role of literature in addressing these concerns, positing the emergence of a contemporary literature of ‘futurised presents’ (J. G. Ballard’s ‘next five minutes’), of which Houellebecq’s work is part.
这篇文章探讨了Michel Houellebecq对基因改造的“人类”种族(被描述为“新人类”)的文学描述,阐明了人类世主题的痛苦,并探索了技术-自然背景下主体性的进化。考虑到Houellebecq在生态批评背景下的工作,本文试图扩展作者的当前阅读,以阐明他对自我反思的人类世主题的看法的含义。它试图探索创造神话是如何在人类世时代演变的,以及在这种背景下人类对自己的行动意味着什么。这也开启了围绕我们当前时代作为“人类世”框架的问题,并试图通过Houellebecq的描述来检查这种理解的悲观主义,以及支撑它的人类例外论的神话。聚焦于《原子化》(2000)和《岛屿的可能性》(2006),我试图阐明Houellebecq对人类世的敏感性的姿态,并评估他在主体和物种层面上对“影子时间”概念的自我否定的描述,“影子时间”被定义为“同时生活在两个或多个时间尺度上的感觉”。此外,它试图质疑文学在解决这些问题中的作用,假设“未来的礼物”的当代文学的出现(J. G. Ballard的“下一个五分钟”),Houellebecq的作品是其中的一部分。