General contractors’ experience using off-site structural framing systems

John Killingsworth, M. Mehany, H. Ladhari
{"title":"General contractors’ experience using off-site structural framing systems","authors":"John Killingsworth, M. Mehany, H. Ladhari","doi":"10.1108/ci-05-2019-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine general contractors’ experiences of using off-site manufactured structural framing systems. This engaged a single-case study using a qualitative methodology to identify expected benefits, actual benefits and challenges of such systems.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA single-case study approach evaluated general contractors’ experience of using a manufactured structural framing system. Qualitative data were collated and analyzed from industry domain experts to determine commonalities and thematic thinking.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study revealed that the reasons behind considering off-site building systems were: accelerating the project schedule, overcoming site constraints and having a better end-product. The top expected benefits were: saving time (schedule), saving cost and improving quality. The top actual observed benefits were: saving erection time, reducing waste generation, reducing project costs, reducing safety risks and improving construction site logistics. The main challenges encountered were: unfamiliarity of different project parties with the off-site framing system, difficulty with reducing the overall project schedule, heavy site logistics and complicated off-site system design and standards requirements. The findings include solutions to overcome the challenges associated with using a manufactured structural system.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper was a case study and therefore inherently limited in its generalizability. The study was conducted with general contractors in the mountain-west region of the USA. However, the implications of the study may have a broad application, as contractors across the globe seek to find similar solutions to using off-site or manufactured construction methods.\n\n\nPractical implications\nConstruction labor shortages around the world are forcing the construction industry to find creative solutions to meet the demand for their services. Manufactured or off-site construction methods provide a possible solution to that labor shortage. However, builders need to be aware of the immediate challenges and actual benefits of using a manufactured structural framing system.\n\n\nSocial implications\nManufactured structural framing systems have the potential to impact lean and sustainable practices in construction. Reduced waste, reduced on-site man-power requirements, reduced construction schedules and reduced injuries each improve the lives of construction workers and the communities around these buildings.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAn extensive literature review was performed to guide the design of this case study. Much has been written about off-site construction practices, but there is a significant research gap on the topic of structural framing systems. This study contributes to expanding the knowledge of off-site construction and specifically helps researchers and practitioners understand the challenges and benefits of this systematic approach to construction.\n","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-05-2019-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine general contractors’ experiences of using off-site manufactured structural framing systems. This engaged a single-case study using a qualitative methodology to identify expected benefits, actual benefits and challenges of such systems. Design/methodology/approach A single-case study approach evaluated general contractors’ experience of using a manufactured structural framing system. Qualitative data were collated and analyzed from industry domain experts to determine commonalities and thematic thinking. Findings The study revealed that the reasons behind considering off-site building systems were: accelerating the project schedule, overcoming site constraints and having a better end-product. The top expected benefits were: saving time (schedule), saving cost and improving quality. The top actual observed benefits were: saving erection time, reducing waste generation, reducing project costs, reducing safety risks and improving construction site logistics. The main challenges encountered were: unfamiliarity of different project parties with the off-site framing system, difficulty with reducing the overall project schedule, heavy site logistics and complicated off-site system design and standards requirements. The findings include solutions to overcome the challenges associated with using a manufactured structural system. Research limitations/implications This paper was a case study and therefore inherently limited in its generalizability. The study was conducted with general contractors in the mountain-west region of the USA. However, the implications of the study may have a broad application, as contractors across the globe seek to find similar solutions to using off-site or manufactured construction methods. Practical implications Construction labor shortages around the world are forcing the construction industry to find creative solutions to meet the demand for their services. Manufactured or off-site construction methods provide a possible solution to that labor shortage. However, builders need to be aware of the immediate challenges and actual benefits of using a manufactured structural framing system. Social implications Manufactured structural framing systems have the potential to impact lean and sustainable practices in construction. Reduced waste, reduced on-site man-power requirements, reduced construction schedules and reduced injuries each improve the lives of construction workers and the communities around these buildings. Originality/value An extensive literature review was performed to guide the design of this case study. Much has been written about off-site construction practices, but there is a significant research gap on the topic of structural framing systems. This study contributes to expanding the knowledge of off-site construction and specifically helps researchers and practitioners understand the challenges and benefits of this systematic approach to construction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
总承包商使用非现场结构框架系统的经验
目的:本文旨在研究总承包商使用非现场制造结构框架系统的经验。这涉及一项使用定性方法的单一案例研究,以确定这种系统的预期效益、实际效益和挑战。设计/方法/方法单一案例研究方法评估总承包商使用制造结构框架系统的经验。从行业领域专家那里整理和分析定性数据,以确定共性和主题思维。研究结果表明,考虑场外建筑系统的原因是:加快项目进度,克服场地限制,以及获得更好的最终产品。最重要的预期效益是:节省时间(进度)、节省成本和提高质量。实际观察到的最大好处是:节省安装时间,减少废物产生,降低项目成本,降低安全风险,改善施工现场物流。遇到的主要挑战是:不同项目方对场外框架系统的不熟悉,难以减少整个项目进度,繁重的现场物流和复杂的场外系统设计和标准要求。研究结果包括克服与使用制造结构系统相关的挑战的解决方案。研究的局限性/意义这篇论文是一个案例研究,因此在其概括性上有固有的局限性。这项研究是与美国西部山区的总承包商一起进行的。然而,这项研究的意义可能有广泛的应用,因为全球的承包商都在寻找类似的解决方案,以使用非现场或制造的施工方法。现实意义世界各地的建筑劳动力短缺迫使建筑行业寻找创造性的解决方案来满足对他们服务的需求。制造或非现场施工方法为劳动力短缺提供了可能的解决方案。然而,建筑商需要意识到使用人造结构框架系统的直接挑战和实际好处。社会影响人造结构框架系统有可能影响建筑中的精益和可持续实践。减少了浪费,减少了现场人力需求,减少了施工进度,减少了伤害,这些都改善了建筑工人和周围社区的生活。原创性/价值通过广泛的文献回顾来指导本案例研究的设计。关于非现场施工实践已经写了很多,但是在结构框架系统的主题上有一个显著的研究差距。这项研究有助于扩展非现场施工的知识,特别是帮助研究人员和从业者了解这种系统施工方法的挑战和好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The feasibility of transparent solar panels for high-rise building façade in Sri Lanka Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects Understanding the key risks in circular construction projects: from systematic review to conceptual framework A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1