Fiscal Federalism and Tax Administration -- Evidence From Germany

Timm Bönke, Beate Jochimsen, Carsten Schröder
{"title":"Fiscal Federalism and Tax Administration -- Evidence From Germany","authors":"Timm Bönke, Beate Jochimsen, Carsten Schröder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2294400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many federations, fiscal equalization schemes soften fiscal imbalances across the member states. Such schemes usually imply that the member states internalize only a small fraction of the additional tax revenue from an expansion of the state-specific tax bases, while the remainder of the additional tax revenue is redistributed horizontally or vertically. We address the question as to which extent state-level jurisdictions in such a federation underexploit their tax bases. By means of a stylized model we show that the state authorities in such a federation have incentives to align the effective tax rates of their residents to the internalized fraction of marginal tax revenue. We empirically test the model using three setups: one state level exercise and two micro level exercises using administrative income-tax data in form of an OLS regression and a natural-experiments design. All setups support the results from our theoretical model.","PeriodicalId":265694,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Intergovernmental Relations & Federalism (Topic)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Intergovernmental Relations & Federalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2294400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In many federations, fiscal equalization schemes soften fiscal imbalances across the member states. Such schemes usually imply that the member states internalize only a small fraction of the additional tax revenue from an expansion of the state-specific tax bases, while the remainder of the additional tax revenue is redistributed horizontally or vertically. We address the question as to which extent state-level jurisdictions in such a federation underexploit their tax bases. By means of a stylized model we show that the state authorities in such a federation have incentives to align the effective tax rates of their residents to the internalized fraction of marginal tax revenue. We empirically test the model using three setups: one state level exercise and two micro level exercises using administrative income-tax data in form of an OLS regression and a natural-experiments design. All setups support the results from our theoretical model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政联邦制与税收征管——来自德国的证据
在许多联邦中,财政均衡方案缓和了成员国之间的财政失衡。这类方案通常意味着,成员国只将扩大本国税基所带来的额外税收收入的一小部分内部化,而其余的额外税收收入则横向或纵向进行再分配。我们解决的问题是,在这种联邦中,州一级的司法管辖区在多大程度上剥削了他们的税基。通过一个模式化的模型,我们表明,在这样一个联邦中,国家当局有动机使其居民的有效税率与边际税收收入的内部化部分保持一致。我们使用三种设置对模型进行了实证检验:一个州层面的练习和两个微观层面的练习,使用行政所得税数据以OLS回归和自然实验设计的形式进行。所有的设置都支持我们的理论模型的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal Central Redistribution with Decentralized Redistribution ОСОБЕННОСТИ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ РАЗВИТИЯ МЕЖРЕГИОНАЛЬНОГО СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВА В РОССИИ (Features and Prospects for Development of Interregional Cooperation in Russia) Preventing COVID-19 Fatalities: State versus Federal Policies American Exceptionalism and the Benefits of Statehood: An Analysis of the Growth Effects of Joining the United States of America Federal Governments Around the World: A Comparative Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1