Trade Liberalization or Oil Shocks: Which Better Explains Structural Breaks in International Trade Ratios?

Suleiman Abu-Bader, Aamer S. Abu-Qarn
{"title":"Trade Liberalization or Oil Shocks: Which Better Explains Structural Breaks in International Trade Ratios?","authors":"Suleiman Abu-Bader, Aamer S. Abu-Qarn","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9396.2010.00852.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ben-David and Papell's (1997) tests for structural breaks in trade ratios over the postwar period revealed that trade ratios exhibited structural breaks in their paths and that postbreak trade averages exceeded prebreak averages. They attributed these breaks to trade liberalization measures carried out during this period. We re-evaluate their results and find that for most countries the averages of actual postbreak ratios were below the averages of the extrapolated prebreak ratios and that a large share of the breaks coincided with the 1970s oil shocks. This would suggest that the oil shocks rather than trade liberalization may account for the breaks.","PeriodicalId":107878,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Globalization (Sustainability) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2010.00852.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Ben-David and Papell's (1997) tests for structural breaks in trade ratios over the postwar period revealed that trade ratios exhibited structural breaks in their paths and that postbreak trade averages exceeded prebreak averages. They attributed these breaks to trade liberalization measures carried out during this period. We re-evaluate their results and find that for most countries the averages of actual postbreak ratios were below the averages of the extrapolated prebreak ratios and that a large share of the breaks coincided with the 1970s oil shocks. This would suggest that the oil shocks rather than trade liberalization may account for the breaks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贸易自由化还是石油冲击:哪个能更好地解释国际贸易比率的结构性断裂?
Ben-David和Papell(1997)对战后贸易比率的结构性断裂的检验表明,贸易比率在其路径上表现出结构性断裂,断裂后的贸易平均值超过了断裂前的平均值。他们将这些中断归因于这一时期实施的贸易自由化措施。我们重新评估了他们的结果,发现对大多数国家来说,实际破产后比率的平均值低于外推破产前比率的平均值,而且很大一部分破产与20世纪70年代的石油危机同时发生。这将表明,油价冲击而不是贸易自由化可能是造成这些中断的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Globalization and Female Economic Participation in MINT and BRICS countries Digital Media Discourse on the Blockage of Huawei by the US Government 2019 World Pensions Forum Held in EU Capital Before G7 Summit Impact of additional equity capital on bank funding costs: Australian evidence Monetary Policy and Financial System Resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1