Comparison of Feto-Maternal Outcomes Between Emergency and Elective Cesarean Deliveries in Patients with Gestational Diabetes

Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.25048/tudod.1233486

M. Obut, Neval Çayönü Kahraman, Sadun Sucu, Ayşe Keleş, Ö. Arat, Ozge Yucel Celik, Mevlüt Bucak, Ayberk Çakir, D. Şahın, A. Yücel

{"title":"Comparison of Feto-Maternal Outcomes Between Emergency and Elective Cesarean Deliveries in Patients with Gestational Diabetes","authors":"M. Obut, Neval Çayönü Kahraman, Sadun Sucu, Ayşe Keleş, Ö. Arat, Ozge Yucel Celik, Mevlüt Bucak, Ayberk Çakir, D. Şahın, A. Yücel","doi":"10.25048/tudod.1233486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare fetal and maternal outcomes between elective and emergency cesarean sections in patients with gestational diabetes \nmellitus (GDM). \nMaterial and Methods: Data from patients with GDM delivered by cesarean section between January 2015 and July 2020 were \nretrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped according to whether the cesarean section was elective (n=129) or emergency (n=158). \nResults: The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with GDM (31.16%) than in patients without GDM. There were more patients \nwith inadequate maternal care in the emergency cesarean section group than in the elective cesarean section group (p=0.003). One \nneonate in the elective group and six in the emergency C/S group died, but the rates of neonatal mortality were similar (p=0.198). \nMaternal morbidity (wound infection, fever, blood transfusion, and maternal intensive care) and fetal morbidity (birth asphyxia, \nrespiratory morbidity, and neonatal intensive care) were higher in the emergency C/S group (p","PeriodicalId":141643,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25048/tudod.1233486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare fetal and maternal outcomes between elective and emergency cesarean sections in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Material and Methods: Data from patients with GDM delivered by cesarean section between January 2015 and July 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped according to whether the cesarean section was elective (n=129) or emergency (n=158). Results: The cesarean section rate was higher in patients with GDM (31.16%) than in patients without GDM. There were more patients with inadequate maternal care in the emergency cesarean section group than in the elective cesarean section group (p=0.003). One neonate in the elective group and six in the emergency C/S group died, but the rates of neonatal mortality were similar (p=0.198). Maternal morbidity (wound infection, fever, blood transfusion, and maternal intensive care) and fetal morbidity (birth asphyxia, respiratory morbidity, and neonatal intensive care) were higher in the emergency C/S group (p

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

妊娠期糖尿病患者急诊和择期剖宫产的胎母结局比较

目的:比较妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者择期和急诊剖宫产的胎儿和母体结局。材料和方法:回顾性分析2015年1月至2020年7月剖宫产分娩的GDM患者的数据。根据择期剖宫产(n=129)和急诊剖宫产(n=158)对患者进行分组。结果:GDM患者剖宫产率(31.16%)高于非GDM患者。急诊剖宫产组产妇护理不足患者多于择期剖宫产组(p=0.003)。择期组1例新生儿死亡，急诊C/S组6例新生儿死亡，但新生儿死亡率相似(p=0.198)。急诊C/S组的产妇发病率(伤口感染、发热、输血和产妇重症监护)和胎儿发病率(出生窒息、呼吸系统发病率和新生儿重症监护)更高(p

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Turkish Journal of Diabetes and Obesity

自引率

0.00%

发文量