Cromwellian Calvinism

H. Powell
{"title":"Cromwellian Calvinism","authors":"H. Powell","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728818.013.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When England’s Parliament rejected enforced Presbyterian conformity in 1648, it was because English Calvinism was never comfortable with elevating polity to a matter of confession. During the Interregnum (1649–1660) former Westminster divines (led by the now ascendant Congregationalists) sought to define orthodoxy for Oliver Cromwell’s state church. They tried repeatedly to strike a balance between enforcing confessional subscription for parish ministers, while still allowing a limited accommodation for those who could not or who would not submit—provided they did not preach or publish against those statements of faith. In the face of growing sectarianism, each confessional attempt saw an increasingly robust (and thus restrictive) Calvinism culminating in the last confession of the Puritan era, the Savoy Declaration.","PeriodicalId":296358,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728818.013.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When England’s Parliament rejected enforced Presbyterian conformity in 1648, it was because English Calvinism was never comfortable with elevating polity to a matter of confession. During the Interregnum (1649–1660) former Westminster divines (led by the now ascendant Congregationalists) sought to define orthodoxy for Oliver Cromwell’s state church. They tried repeatedly to strike a balance between enforcing confessional subscription for parish ministers, while still allowing a limited accommodation for those who could not or who would not submit—provided they did not preach or publish against those statements of faith. In the face of growing sectarianism, each confessional attempt saw an increasingly robust (and thus restrictive) Calvinism culminating in the last confession of the Puritan era, the Savoy Declaration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克伦威尔的加尔文主义
当英格兰议会在1648年拒绝强制长老会服从时,这是因为英国的加尔文主义从不愿意将政治提升到忏悔的层面。在空位时期(1649-1660),前威斯敏斯特的神学家(由现在正在崛起的公理会派领导)试图为奥利弗·克伦威尔的国教定义正统。他们反复尝试在强制教区牧师忏悔之间取得平衡,同时允许那些不能或不愿服从的人有限的住宿-只要他们不讲道或发表反对这些信仰的声明。面对日益增长的宗派主义,每一次忏悔的尝试都见证了一个日益强大的(因此也是限制性的)加尔文主义,最终在清教时代的最后一次忏悔中达到高潮,即萨沃伊宣言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Confessional Strife on Religious Authority in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century Calvin, Calvinism, and Medieval Thought Cultures of Calvinism in Early Modern Scotland Calvinist Debates on History Karl Barth’s Calvin: A Weimar Prophet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1