Scholarly Behavior: Bounded Rational Production of Rational Scientific Knowledge

V. Tambovtsev
{"title":"Scholarly Behavior: Bounded Rational Production of Rational Scientific Knowledge","authors":"V. Tambovtsev","doi":"10.19181/smtp.2023.5.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People differ greatly in cognitive abilities, but all of them have limited abilities, ranging from the ability to perceive the surrounding reality and ending with the implementation of mathematical calculations and logical conclusions from the premises made. If a fully rational individual not only has complete information about the world, but also unlimited possibilities to make calculations and draw logical conclusions, then real people, including professional researchers, are only bounded rational. However, the scientific knowledge produced by scientists is close to completely rational. The article discusses the components of bounded rationality and those mechanisms within science that allow such a transition to be made. The leading role among these mechanisms belongs to scholarly communication, one of the functions of which is the correction of involuntary and unconscious errors made by bounded rational researchers. It is shown that the execution of this function faces certain difficulties, which are important to investigate in order to improve the error correction process.","PeriodicalId":433804,"journal":{"name":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Management: Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2023.5.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People differ greatly in cognitive abilities, but all of them have limited abilities, ranging from the ability to perceive the surrounding reality and ending with the implementation of mathematical calculations and logical conclusions from the premises made. If a fully rational individual not only has complete information about the world, but also unlimited possibilities to make calculations and draw logical conclusions, then real people, including professional researchers, are only bounded rational. However, the scientific knowledge produced by scientists is close to completely rational. The article discusses the components of bounded rationality and those mechanisms within science that allow such a transition to be made. The leading role among these mechanisms belongs to scholarly communication, one of the functions of which is the correction of involuntary and unconscious errors made by bounded rational researchers. It is shown that the execution of this function faces certain difficulties, which are important to investigate in order to improve the error correction process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术行为:理性科学知识的有限理性生产
人们的认知能力差异很大,但所有人的能力都是有限的,从感知周围现实的能力到根据前提进行数学计算和逻辑结论的能力。如果一个完全理性的个体不仅对世界有完整的信息,而且有无限的可能性进行计算和得出逻辑结论,那么真实的人,包括专业研究人员,只是有限的理性。然而,科学家所产生的科学知识是接近于完全理性的。本文讨论了有限理性的组成部分以及科学中允许这种过渡的那些机制。在这些机制中起主导作用的是学术交流,其功能之一是纠正有限理性研究者所犯的非自愿和无意识错误。结果表明,该函数的执行存在一定的困难,研究这些困难对改进纠错过程具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Separation of Scientific Activity and the State-owned Corporate Form of Science Management in Contemporary Russia. Part 1 Jurisprudence for the Development of Science: Ideas that Should Not Be Forgotten (To the 100th Anniversary of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the RF) The State Policy of the USSR in Relation to the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in the Second Half of the 20th Century. The Organizational and Legal Aspect Introduction of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Russian Economy: A Practitioner’s View Digitalization of Public Administration and Economy: Terminological Clarity as a Factor of Success of Digital Development. Review of the Textbook “Digital State and Economy” Edited by S. E. Prokofiev, O. V. Panina and K. V. Kharchenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1