Barriers and Facilitators of Community Integration of People With Spinal Cord Injuries Living in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Meenakshi Mohan, R. Deb
{"title":"Barriers and Facilitators of Community Integration of People With Spinal Cord Injuries Living in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review","authors":"Meenakshi Mohan, R. Deb","doi":"10.32598/fdj.5.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is an irreversible and potentially life-altering event that creates poor economic conditions. The SCI healthcare model has shifted more towards patient-centered care, which focuses on the issues that affect the quality of life and community integration of people with such disabilities. This systematic review was conducted to identify the factors influencing the community integration of SCI individuals in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: Three databases of Scopus, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched with the keywords of “spinal cord injury”, “tetraplegia”, “paraplegia”, and “challenges” for relevant articles published from 2010 to 2020. Boolean operators “OR” and “AND” were used between the keywords, and cross-linking methods were applied to get better results. The quality assessment of the included studies was analyzed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Thomas tool. The extracted data included demographic details, sample size, results, and outcome measures. Results: A total of 26 peer-reviewed studies were included in the review. The evidence extracted was classified into six categories that influence the community participation (either positive or negative) of SCI individuals. Conclusion: The review revealed more barriers in the form of health-related, environmental, psychological, and social issues that hinder the community reintegration of individuals with SCI compared to facilitators such as spirituality, family/friends support, self-efficacy and resilience. Most research studies highlighted specific environmental obstacles in terms of accessibility and affordability. By working on these challenges, the authorities can enhance community integration of the SCI population in low- and middle-income countries.","PeriodicalId":330157,"journal":{"name":"Function and Disability Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Function and Disability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/fdj.5.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is an irreversible and potentially life-altering event that creates poor economic conditions. The SCI healthcare model has shifted more towards patient-centered care, which focuses on the issues that affect the quality of life and community integration of people with such disabilities. This systematic review was conducted to identify the factors influencing the community integration of SCI individuals in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: Three databases of Scopus, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched with the keywords of “spinal cord injury”, “tetraplegia”, “paraplegia”, and “challenges” for relevant articles published from 2010 to 2020. Boolean operators “OR” and “AND” were used between the keywords, and cross-linking methods were applied to get better results. The quality assessment of the included studies was analyzed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Thomas tool. The extracted data included demographic details, sample size, results, and outcome measures. Results: A total of 26 peer-reviewed studies were included in the review. The evidence extracted was classified into six categories that influence the community participation (either positive or negative) of SCI individuals. Conclusion: The review revealed more barriers in the form of health-related, environmental, psychological, and social issues that hinder the community reintegration of individuals with SCI compared to facilitators such as spirituality, family/friends support, self-efficacy and resilience. Most research studies highlighted specific environmental obstacles in terms of accessibility and affordability. By working on these challenges, the authorities can enhance community integration of the SCI population in low- and middle-income countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入和中等收入国家脊髓损伤患者融入社区的障碍和促进因素:一项系统综述
背景和目的:脊髓损伤(SCI)是一种不可逆转的、可能改变生活的事件,它会造成不良的经济条件。脊髓损伤的医疗模式已经更多地转向以患者为中心的护理,其重点是影响这些残疾人的生活质量和社区融入的问题。本研究旨在探讨影响中低收入国家脊髓损伤患者社区融合的因素。方法:以“脊髓损伤”、“四肢瘫”、“截瘫”、“挑战”为关键词,在Scopus、PsycINFO、PubMed 3个数据库中检索2010 - 2020年发表的相关文章。关键词之间使用“OR”和“and”布尔运算符,并采用交联的方法,以获得更好的结果。采用关键评估技能程序(CASP)和Thomas工具对纳入研究的质量评估进行分析。提取的数据包括人口统计细节、样本量、结果和结果测量。结果:共纳入26项同行评议研究。将所提取的证据分为影响SCI个体社区参与(积极或消极)的6类。结论:本综述揭示了与精神、家人/朋友支持、自我效能和恢复力等促进因素相比,健康、环境、心理和社会问题等形式的障碍更多地阻碍了脊髓损伤患者的社区重新融入。大多数研究都强调了在可及性和可负担性方面的具体环境障碍。通过应对这些挑战,当局可以加强低收入和中等收入国家脊髓损伤人群的社区融合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perception and Experiences of Rehabilitation Service Providers of Teamwork Barriers in Tehran Province, Iran The Relationship Between Balance and Fine Motor Skills in Children With Intellectual Disability Gap in Noise Auditory Brainstem Responses: A Systematic Review The Effect of Vocal Warm up and Cool Down Exercises on the Acoustic Characteristics in Speech and Language Pathologists: A Pilot Study Application of the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) in Psychosocial Needs of Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1