From Bench to Board: Gender Differences in University Scientists’ Participation in Commercial Science

Waverly W. Ding, Fiona E. Murray, Toby E. Stuart
{"title":"From Bench to Board: Gender Differences in University Scientists’ Participation in Commercial Science","authors":"Waverly W. Ding, Fiona E. Murray, Toby E. Stuart","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1658475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines gender differences in the participation of university life science faculty in commercial science. Based on theory and field interviews, we develop hypotheses regarding how scientists’ productivity, co-authorship networks, and institutional affiliations have different effects on whether male and female faculty become “academic entrepreneurs”. We then statistically examine this framework in a national sample of 6,000 life scientists whose careers span more than 20 years. We find sharp gender differences in participation in for-profit ventures, which we measure as the likelihood of joining the scientific advisory board (SAB) of a biotechnology firm. Compared to men, women life scientists are much less likely to advise for-profit biotechnology companies. We also identify factors that contour this gender difference, including scientists’ co-authorship network structure and the level of support for commercial science at their universities. Surprisingly, we find that the (conditional) gender gap is largest among faculty members at the highest status institutions.","PeriodicalId":382748,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Institutional Economics (Topic)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Institutional Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1658475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper examines gender differences in the participation of university life science faculty in commercial science. Based on theory and field interviews, we develop hypotheses regarding how scientists’ productivity, co-authorship networks, and institutional affiliations have different effects on whether male and female faculty become “academic entrepreneurs”. We then statistically examine this framework in a national sample of 6,000 life scientists whose careers span more than 20 years. We find sharp gender differences in participation in for-profit ventures, which we measure as the likelihood of joining the scientific advisory board (SAB) of a biotechnology firm. Compared to men, women life scientists are much less likely to advise for-profit biotechnology companies. We also identify factors that contour this gender difference, including scientists’ co-authorship network structure and the level of support for commercial science at their universities. Surprisingly, we find that the (conditional) gender gap is largest among faculty members at the highest status institutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从法官到董事会:大学科学家参与商业科学的性别差异
本文考察了大学生命科学教师参与商科的性别差异。基于理论和实地访谈,我们提出了关于科学家的生产力、合作网络和机构隶属关系如何对男女教师是否成为“学术企业家”产生不同影响的假设。然后,我们在6000名职业生涯超过20年的生命科学家的全国样本中进行了统计检验。我们发现,在参与营利性企业方面存在明显的性别差异,我们以加入生物技术公司的科学顾问委员会(SAB)的可能性来衡量这一点。与男性相比,女性生命科学家不太可能给营利性生物技术公司提供建议。我们还确定了影响这种性别差异的因素,包括科学家的共同作者网络结构和他们所在大学对商业科学的支持水平。令人惊讶的是,我们发现(有条件的)性别差距在地位最高的院校的教员中最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic Modelling of the Bitcoin Mining Industry What Diplomacy in the Ancient near East Can Tell Us about Blockchain Technology Restructuring of the Scientific Research Institutes Formerly Subordinated to the Russian Academy of Sciencies: An Assesment of Change Development of a Performance Assessment System for Scientific Research Organisations, as a Part of the Ongoing Rapid Reform Companies Spun Out of Universities: Different Typologies for Different Performance Patterns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1