Bureaucratic Sorceries in The Third Policeman: Anthropological Perspectives on Magic and Officialdom

Alexandra Irimia
{"title":"Bureaucratic Sorceries in The Third Policeman: Anthropological Perspectives on Magic and Officialdom","authors":"Alexandra Irimia","doi":"10.16995/pr.7662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history ofanthropological discourse retraces a long and subtle thread of analogiesbetween the seemingly disparate worlds of bureaucracy and magic, from BronisławMalinowski (as early as 1922) to Graham Jones (2017), passing through the worksof Claude Lévi-Strauss, Stanley Tambiah,Michael Herzfeld, and David Graeber. A complex dialectic of enchantment anddisenchantment involving experiments with the dynamics of reason and unreasonis also a recurrent motif in the Western literary tradition of bureaucratic andanti-bureaucratic narratives. What enables and justifies a comparison betweenthe irrational nature of magical thinking and a social form of systematization,regulation, and control, famously described by Max Weber as being primarilyguided by an effort of rationalization? The article provides an overview ofseveral possible answers to this question, illustrated with examples from FlannO’Brien’s TheThird Policeman.","PeriodicalId":279786,"journal":{"name":"The Parish Review: Journal of Flann O'Brien Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Parish Review: Journal of Flann O'Brien Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/pr.7662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history ofanthropological discourse retraces a long and subtle thread of analogiesbetween the seemingly disparate worlds of bureaucracy and magic, from BronisławMalinowski (as early as 1922) to Graham Jones (2017), passing through the worksof Claude Lévi-Strauss, Stanley Tambiah,Michael Herzfeld, and David Graeber. A complex dialectic of enchantment anddisenchantment involving experiments with the dynamics of reason and unreasonis also a recurrent motif in the Western literary tradition of bureaucratic andanti-bureaucratic narratives. What enables and justifies a comparison betweenthe irrational nature of magical thinking and a social form of systematization,regulation, and control, famously described by Max Weber as being primarilyguided by an effort of rationalization? The article provides an overview ofseveral possible answers to this question, illustrated with examples from FlannO’Brien’s TheThird Policeman.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《第三个警察》中的官僚巫术:巫术与官场的人类学视角
人类学话语的历史追溯了看似不同的官僚主义和魔法世界之间漫长而微妙的类比线索,从BronisławMalinowski(早在1922年)到Graham Jones(2017年),通过Claude l -斯特劳斯,Stanley Tambiah,Michael Herzfeld和David Graeber的作品。在西方文学传统的官僚主义和反官僚主义叙事中,一种涉及理性与非理性动态实验的复杂的迷人与祛魅辩证法也是一个反复出现的主题。是什么使得魔法思维的非理性本质与马克斯·韦伯(Max Weber)所描述的主要由合理化努力引导的系统化、监管和控制的社会形式之间的比较成为可能,并证明这种比较是合理的?这篇文章概述了这个问题的几个可能的答案,并以弗兰诺·布莱恩的《第三个警察》中的例子作了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review of Irish Modernisms: Gaps, Conjectures, Possibilities (2021), edited by Paul Fagan, John Greaney and Tamara Radak. John Garvin and Brian O’Nolan in Civil Service Bureaucratic Sorceries in The Third Policeman: Anthropological Perspectives on Magic and Officialdom Mylesean Onomastics: Games Names Play “F___ the County Council”: Local Government and Biopolitical Allegory in Flann O’Brien.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1