The Temporal Relationships between the Pluscuamperfecto and mientras + Imperfecto

Jakob Egetenmeyer
{"title":"The Temporal Relationships between the Pluscuamperfecto and mientras + Imperfecto","authors":"Jakob Egetenmeyer","doi":"10.1515/shll-2023-2004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper analyzes the temporal relationship between a pluperfect verb in a main clause and a following subordinate clause introduced by mientras (‘while’) with an imperfect verb. The specific lexical and aspectual properties of the components lead to clashing expectations concerning the temporal relationship within the structure. The issues are three-fold. First, the subordinating conjunction lexically expresses the co-temporality of the subordinate clause with regard to another eventuality. Second, this may be possible when the pluperfect verb has an eventive reading, but what happens if it asserts a post-state? Third, the widely recognized discourse structural description (coming from DRT) of an imperfect verb is that its location time includes a previously introduced reference time. However, in traditional terms, the reference time involved in the meaning of a pluperfect verb is posterior to the event the pluperfect verb expresses. We address these issues and present a dataset collected from various corpora which underlines that the temporal relationships within the structure show a surprising variability. We discuss the different possibilities in depth, taking Aktionsart and subject reference into account. We also focus on the theoretical issue of the concept of reference time. On the basis of our data, and counter to the traditional approach, we argue that a temporal discourse structure should account for pluperfect verbs by means of secondary reference times.","PeriodicalId":126470,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2023-2004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the temporal relationship between a pluperfect verb in a main clause and a following subordinate clause introduced by mientras (‘while’) with an imperfect verb. The specific lexical and aspectual properties of the components lead to clashing expectations concerning the temporal relationship within the structure. The issues are three-fold. First, the subordinating conjunction lexically expresses the co-temporality of the subordinate clause with regard to another eventuality. Second, this may be possible when the pluperfect verb has an eventive reading, but what happens if it asserts a post-state? Third, the widely recognized discourse structural description (coming from DRT) of an imperfect verb is that its location time includes a previously introduced reference time. However, in traditional terms, the reference time involved in the meaning of a pluperfect verb is posterior to the event the pluperfect verb expresses. We address these issues and present a dataset collected from various corpora which underlines that the temporal relationships within the structure show a surprising variability. We discuss the different possibilities in depth, taking Aktionsart and subject reference into account. We also focus on the theoretical issue of the concept of reference time. On the basis of our data, and counter to the traditional approach, we argue that a temporal discourse structure should account for pluperfect verbs by means of secondary reference times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Pluscuamperfecto”与“mientras + Imperfecto”的时间关系
摘要:本文分析了主句中动词后完成时与后句中动词后完成时的时间关系。组件的特定词汇和方面属性导致了对结构内时间关系的冲突期望。问题有三个方面。首先,从属连词在词汇上表达了从属从句对另一种可能性的共时性。其次,当后完成动词具有事件读法时,这可能是可能的,但如果它断言后状态会发生什么呢?第三,对不完全动词的广泛认可的话语结构描述(来自DRT)是它的位置时间包含了先前引入的参考时间。然而,在传统的术语中,后完成动词的意义所涉及的参考时间是后完成动词所表达的事件。我们解决了这些问题,并提出了一个从各种语料库收集的数据集,该数据集强调了结构内的时间关系显示出惊人的可变性。我们深入讨论了不同的可能性,并考虑到了Aktionsart和subject reference。我们还重点讨论了参考时间概念的理论问题。基于我们的数据,与传统的方法相反,我们认为时间语篇结构应该通过辅助参考时间来解释过去完成时动词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context-specific use and ideology: perception of appropriate domains for dar + gerund Calling vocatives duration in Libolo Portuguese Conflicting standards and variability: Spirantization in two varieties of Uruguayan Spanish Static and dynamic analyses of velar palatalization in Chilean Spanish Spanish loan verbs in Paraguayan Guaraní: coexistence, replacement, or both?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1