Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects

C. Sacha, J. Petrozza
{"title":"Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects","authors":"C. Sacha, J. Petrozza","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the risks of adverse outcomes such as birth defects after the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is crucial for both OB/GYN physicians and patients suffering from infertility. In a South Australian population cohort study of 308,974 spontaneous and assisted pregnancies between 1986 and 2002 in women over age 20, assisted conceptions were associated with an increased risk of birth defects, including cerebral palsy, compared to spontaneous conceptions in fertile women (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.41). However, when examining in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies, only ICSI with fresh transfer remained associated with an increased risk of birth defects compared to spontaneous conceptions in fertile women in adjusted models. These findings suggest that while patients should be counseled regarding the potential increased risk of birth defects with ART procedures such as ICSI, more research is needed regarding the impact of infertility itself and specific ART interventions on neonatal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":114053,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the risks of adverse outcomes such as birth defects after the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is crucial for both OB/GYN physicians and patients suffering from infertility. In a South Australian population cohort study of 308,974 spontaneous and assisted pregnancies between 1986 and 2002 in women over age 20, assisted conceptions were associated with an increased risk of birth defects, including cerebral palsy, compared to spontaneous conceptions in fertile women (adjusted odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.41). However, when examining in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies, only ICSI with fresh transfer remained associated with an increased risk of birth defects compared to spontaneous conceptions in fertile women in adjusted models. These findings suggest that while patients should be counseled regarding the potential increased risk of birth defects with ART procedures such as ICSI, more research is needed regarding the impact of infertility itself and specific ART interventions on neonatal outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生殖技术和出生缺陷的风险
了解使用辅助生殖技术(ART)后出生缺陷等不良后果的风险对妇产科医生和不孕症患者都至关重要。在南澳大利亚的一项人口队列研究中,1986年至2002年期间,在20岁以上的女性中,有308,974名自然怀孕和辅助怀孕的女性,与自然受孕的女性相比,辅助受孕与出生缺陷(包括脑瘫)的风险增加有关(调整优势比1.28,95%置信区间1.16-1.41)。然而,当检查体外受精和卵浆内单精子注射(ICSI)妊娠时,在调整后的模型中,与自然受孕相比,只有新鲜移植的ICSI与出生缺陷的风险增加有关。这些发现表明,虽然应该告知患者ICSI等ART手术可能增加出生缺陷的风险,但还需要更多关于不孕症本身和特定ART干预对新生儿结局的影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Morbidity and Obstetric Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1