Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy

A. Battarbee, N. Vora
{"title":"Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy","authors":"A. Battarbee, N. Vora","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a prospective, multicenter blinded study at 35 international centers, the Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy (NEXT) study evaluated the performance of cell-free DNA screening for fetal trisomy compared to standard first trimester screening with nuchal translucency and serum analytes in a routine prenatal population. Among the 15,841 women who had standard screening and cell-free DNA analysis with neonatal outcome data, there were 68 chromosomal abnormalities (1 in 236). Of these, 38 were Trisomy 21 (1 in 417). Cell-free DNA analysis had a higher area under the curve (AUC) for trisomy 21, compared to standard screening (0.999 vs. 0.958, p = 0.001). Cell-free DNA analysis also had greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to standard screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. While cell-free DNA analysis cannot detect all chromosome abnormalities, it performed better than standard screening for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in a routine population including low- and high-risk women.","PeriodicalId":114053,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

In a prospective, multicenter blinded study at 35 international centers, the Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy (NEXT) study evaluated the performance of cell-free DNA screening for fetal trisomy compared to standard first trimester screening with nuchal translucency and serum analytes in a routine prenatal population. Among the 15,841 women who had standard screening and cell-free DNA analysis with neonatal outcome data, there were 68 chromosomal abnormalities (1 in 236). Of these, 38 were Trisomy 21 (1 in 417). Cell-free DNA analysis had a higher area under the curve (AUC) for trisomy 21, compared to standard screening (0.999 vs. 0.958, p = 0.001). Cell-free DNA analysis also had greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to standard screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. While cell-free DNA analysis cannot detect all chromosome abnormalities, it performed better than standard screening for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in a routine population including low- and high-risk women.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胎儿非整倍体的无细胞DNA筛查
在一项在35个国际中心进行的前瞻性、多中心盲法研究中,无创三体检查(NEXT)研究评估了无细胞DNA筛查胎儿三体的性能,并将其与常规产前人群的标准孕早期筛查进行了比较。在15841名接受标准筛查和无细胞DNA分析的新生儿结局数据的妇女中,有68名染色体异常(1 / 236)。其中,38人是21三体(417人中有1人)。与标准筛选相比,21三体的无细胞DNA分析具有更高的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.999比0.958,p = 0.001)。与21、18和13三体的标准筛查相比,无细胞DNA分析也具有更高的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。虽然无细胞DNA分析不能检测到所有的染色体异常,但在包括低风险和高风险妇女在内的常规人群中,它比标准筛查检测21、18和13三体要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Morbidity and Obstetric Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1