{"title":"Migrating to Alma Without an Acquisitions Staff: Evolving Acquisitions and\n Electronic Workflows From Their Legacy Silos","authors":"Jennifer K. Matthews, C. Davidian","doi":"10.5703/1288284317187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the decision was made to migrate to Alma integrated library system, Rowan\n University libraries had an acquisitions department and a moderate understanding of how\n this migration would occur. With the official announcement of the migration to Alma, the\n entire acquisitions team announced their retirement shortly thereafter. While Alma\n provided the library with an opportunity to reevaluate workflows and collaborations this\n was a curveball that no one was expecting. Additionally, many resources were not\n traditionally tracked in Voyager, the previous library management system but tracked in\n Intota the previous electronic resource management system. However, these resources\n would now be tracked in Alma for a variety of reasons. This added another layer of\n complication to the retirements that occurred and the implementation that was well\n underway. This paper will discuss how Rowan University Libraries has managed the Alma\n migration without the historical institutional memory of the former acquisitions team.\n It will also examine how the libraries have examined workflows anew as a result of both\n the migration and these vacancies, and how Rowan University Library has taken advantage\n of these expanding opportunities since the beginning of the migration until and through\n the go-live date to account for these new integrations.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
When the decision was made to migrate to Alma integrated library system, Rowan
University libraries had an acquisitions department and a moderate understanding of how
this migration would occur. With the official announcement of the migration to Alma, the
entire acquisitions team announced their retirement shortly thereafter. While Alma
provided the library with an opportunity to reevaluate workflows and collaborations this
was a curveball that no one was expecting. Additionally, many resources were not
traditionally tracked in Voyager, the previous library management system but tracked in
Intota the previous electronic resource management system. However, these resources
would now be tracked in Alma for a variety of reasons. This added another layer of
complication to the retirements that occurred and the implementation that was well
underway. This paper will discuss how Rowan University Libraries has managed the Alma
migration without the historical institutional memory of the former acquisitions team.
It will also examine how the libraries have examined workflows anew as a result of both
the migration and these vacancies, and how Rowan University Library has taken advantage
of these expanding opportunities since the beginning of the migration until and through
the go-live date to account for these new integrations.