Etiological Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Eye Lid Laceration: A Hospital Based Prospective Study

B. Thapa, N. Gurung
{"title":"Etiological Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Eye Lid Laceration: A Hospital Based Prospective Study","authors":"B. Thapa, N. Gurung","doi":"10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Lid laceration is a very common peri-ocular trauma. Regarding the etiology and treatment, it lacks studies in developing nations including Nepal. \nAims: To assess the etiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of eyelid laceration. \nMethods: In this study, 47 cases of traumatic eyelid laceration were consecutively studied and its epidemiology, etiology and treatment outcome were evaluated. \nResults: The 47 patients were included in the study. The mean age of study population was 26.14 ± 18.02 years. Male: female ratio was 1.6:1. The trauma occurred on road in 34 (72.3%) cases, followed by at home (14.9%), at work place (8.5%) and at entertainment areas (4.2%). The most common mode of injury was road traffic accident (72.3%) followed by fall injury (17%), Physical assault (6.4%) and animal bite (4.3%). The 68.1% of had isolated lid laceration, 12.7% had other adnexal injuries and 10.6% had globe injuries, 8.5% had other facial injuries and only 4.1% had systemic trauma. The partial thickness laceration was observed on 42(89.4%) cases and full thickness laceration on 5 (10.6%) cases. The length of lid laceration ranged from 4- 45 mm (mean ±SD was 14.7±8.3 mm). The 14.9% cases had canalicular laceration. The 85% of the laceration healed without visible scar. Only 4 patients (8.5%) had thick hypertrophic scar. The visual function was intact in 44 patients whereas impaired in 3 patients with accompanying open globe injury. The complications noted were hypertrophic scar (8.6%), wound infection (2.1%), ectropion (2.1%), corneal opacity (2.1%) and phthisis bulbi (2.1%). \nConclusion: This study highlights the high-risk people and work place for eyelid laceration and the safety precautions in dangerous settings, including daily and routine work places. Only accompanying open globe injury can damage visual function.","PeriodicalId":166882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepalgunj Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jngmc.v20i1.48322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Lid laceration is a very common peri-ocular trauma. Regarding the etiology and treatment, it lacks studies in developing nations including Nepal. Aims: To assess the etiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of eyelid laceration. Methods: In this study, 47 cases of traumatic eyelid laceration were consecutively studied and its epidemiology, etiology and treatment outcome were evaluated. Results: The 47 patients were included in the study. The mean age of study population was 26.14 ± 18.02 years. Male: female ratio was 1.6:1. The trauma occurred on road in 34 (72.3%) cases, followed by at home (14.9%), at work place (8.5%) and at entertainment areas (4.2%). The most common mode of injury was road traffic accident (72.3%) followed by fall injury (17%), Physical assault (6.4%) and animal bite (4.3%). The 68.1% of had isolated lid laceration, 12.7% had other adnexal injuries and 10.6% had globe injuries, 8.5% had other facial injuries and only 4.1% had systemic trauma. The partial thickness laceration was observed on 42(89.4%) cases and full thickness laceration on 5 (10.6%) cases. The length of lid laceration ranged from 4- 45 mm (mean ±SD was 14.7±8.3 mm). The 14.9% cases had canalicular laceration. The 85% of the laceration healed without visible scar. Only 4 patients (8.5%) had thick hypertrophic scar. The visual function was intact in 44 patients whereas impaired in 3 patients with accompanying open globe injury. The complications noted were hypertrophic scar (8.6%), wound infection (2.1%), ectropion (2.1%), corneal opacity (2.1%) and phthisis bulbi (2.1%). Conclusion: This study highlights the high-risk people and work place for eyelid laceration and the safety precautions in dangerous settings, including daily and routine work places. Only accompanying open globe injury can damage visual function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼睑撕裂伤的病因特征和治疗结果:一项基于医院的前瞻性研究
眼睑撕裂伤是一种非常常见的眼周外伤。关于病因和治疗,缺乏在包括尼泊尔在内的发展中国家的研究。目的:探讨眼睑撕裂伤的病因特点及治疗效果。方法:对47例外伤性眼睑撕裂伤进行回顾性分析,分析其流行病学、病因及治疗效果。结果:47例患者纳入研究。研究人群的平均年龄为26.14±18.02岁。男女比例为1.6:1。道路创伤34例(72.3%),其次是家中(14.9%)、工作场所(8.5%)和娱乐场所(4.2%)。最常见的伤害方式是道路交通事故(72.3%),其次是摔伤(17%)、人身攻击(6.4%)和动物咬伤(4.3%)。68.1%为孤立性眼睑撕裂伤,12.7%为其他附件损伤,10.6%为眼球损伤,8.5%为其他面部损伤,仅有4.1%为全身损伤。部分层裂伤42例(89.4%),全层裂伤5例(10.6%)。眼睑撕裂长度为4 ~ 45mm(平均±标准差14.7±8.3 mm)。14.9%为小管撕裂伤。85%的伤口愈合后无明显疤痕。仅有4例(8.5%)出现厚增生性瘢痕。44例患者视觉功能完好,3例患者伴有开放性眼球损伤。并发症包括增生性瘢痕(8.6%)、伤口感染(2.1%)、外翻(2.1%)、角膜混浊(2.1%)和球疱疮(2.1%)。结论:本研究突出了眼睑撕裂伤的高危人群和工作场所以及危险场所的安全注意事项,包括日常和常规工作场所。只有伴有开放性眼球损伤才会损害视觉功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the Relationship of Lipid Profile, BMI and Blood Pressure among Non-diabetic Hypertensive Patients - A Hospital Based Study Comparative Study of Opioid Free versus Opioid Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Radiopathological Correlation in Diagnosis of Adnexal Lesions: A Hospital Based Comparative Study Correlation of Mastoid Pneumatization with Middle Ear Pathology in Unilateral Squamous Type of Chronic Otitis Media Functional Outcome of Isolated Middle to Distal Third Ulnar Shaft Fracture in Adults with Square Nail Fixation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1