Regulating the Autonomy of Gig Workers. A Paternalizing Look into the Consent-Based Platform Work Economy

Marta Santos Silva, M. Houwerzijl
{"title":"Regulating the Autonomy of Gig Workers. A Paternalizing Look into the Consent-Based Platform Work Economy","authors":"Marta Santos Silva, M. Houwerzijl","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3383159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of the traditional labour market has been changed by globalisation and modern technology, particularly by the unprecedented and generalised use of smartphones. The platform economy, also called “gig economy” is radically changing the rights and duties of service providers, as it is associated with a high degree of flexibility and profit maximisation, which suppresses or significantly limits traditional workers’ rights, such as the right to paid holiday, maternity license or unemployment benefits.<br><br>This paper focuses on Uber, the current international market leader on online ridesourcing platforms, and the impact they have on gig workers that chose to enter the platform. Online ridesourcing platforms assign private drivers to rides booked and paid for by passengers through an app. The platform’s drivers may vary from ‘genuine’ freelance business owners, ‘multiple jobholders’, “moonlight” workers to workers who opted for working full-time as gig workers.<br><br>Among the latter are former professional riders or amateur riders who were unable to cope with the tight restrictions of a heavily regulated professional passenger transportation sector, high-priced licenses, inefficient work-life balance policies and lack of safety guarantees. A sector of the scholarship argues that the conditions offered by platforms to drivers encourage entrepreneurship across all segments of society and foster the decentralization of economic growth. In fact, on-demand ridesharing platforms adapt the drivers’ income to the market, providing for primetime pricing to meet increased demand. Additionally, by allowing for a flexible work schedule, they are deemed to promote work-life balance. Finally, by integrating technology they ensure a more efficient provision of services and a safer one as well, with passenger registration, money-free rides and GPS location as integral part of the operation. The wider majority of the scholarship, however, has been heavily criticizing these platform services for infringing workers’ rights.<br><br>If there is an almost consensus in the scholarship that gig workers have been opting for entering a labour economy which will affect them, their families and other parts of the working population in the mid or long-run, the question is asked whether it is justified for regulators to nudge such workers into taking decisions (or imposing these upon them) which are better for their own welfare and the decent living standard of other workers. In other words, what should be the balance between respecting the autonomy of ‘gig-workers’ in grasping their chances to access the ‘gig-labour market’ and taking paternalizing measures to protect ‘gig-workers’ against ‘self-exploitation ’? <br>","PeriodicalId":292127,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Employment Contract Law (Topic)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Employment Contract Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3383159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The role of the traditional labour market has been changed by globalisation and modern technology, particularly by the unprecedented and generalised use of smartphones. The platform economy, also called “gig economy” is radically changing the rights and duties of service providers, as it is associated with a high degree of flexibility and profit maximisation, which suppresses or significantly limits traditional workers’ rights, such as the right to paid holiday, maternity license or unemployment benefits.

This paper focuses on Uber, the current international market leader on online ridesourcing platforms, and the impact they have on gig workers that chose to enter the platform. Online ridesourcing platforms assign private drivers to rides booked and paid for by passengers through an app. The platform’s drivers may vary from ‘genuine’ freelance business owners, ‘multiple jobholders’, “moonlight” workers to workers who opted for working full-time as gig workers.

Among the latter are former professional riders or amateur riders who were unable to cope with the tight restrictions of a heavily regulated professional passenger transportation sector, high-priced licenses, inefficient work-life balance policies and lack of safety guarantees. A sector of the scholarship argues that the conditions offered by platforms to drivers encourage entrepreneurship across all segments of society and foster the decentralization of economic growth. In fact, on-demand ridesharing platforms adapt the drivers’ income to the market, providing for primetime pricing to meet increased demand. Additionally, by allowing for a flexible work schedule, they are deemed to promote work-life balance. Finally, by integrating technology they ensure a more efficient provision of services and a safer one as well, with passenger registration, money-free rides and GPS location as integral part of the operation. The wider majority of the scholarship, however, has been heavily criticizing these platform services for infringing workers’ rights.

If there is an almost consensus in the scholarship that gig workers have been opting for entering a labour economy which will affect them, their families and other parts of the working population in the mid or long-run, the question is asked whether it is justified for regulators to nudge such workers into taking decisions (or imposing these upon them) which are better for their own welfare and the decent living standard of other workers. In other words, what should be the balance between respecting the autonomy of ‘gig-workers’ in grasping their chances to access the ‘gig-labour market’ and taking paternalizing measures to protect ‘gig-workers’ against ‘self-exploitation ’?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规范零工工人的自主权。对基于同意的平台工作经济的家长式观察
传统劳动力市场的角色已经被全球化和现代技术所改变,尤其是智能手机的空前普及。平台经济,也被称为“零工经济”,正在从根本上改变服务提供商的权利和义务,因为它与高度的灵活性和利润最大化有关,这压制或严重限制了传统工人的权利,如带薪假期、生育许可证或失业救济金的权利。这篇论文的重点是优步,目前国际市场的领导者在线打车平台,以及他们对选择进入该平台的零工工人的影响。在线叫车平台为乘客通过应用程序预订并支付费用的车辆分配私人司机。平台的司机可能是“真正的”自由职业者、“多职业”、“兼职”工人,也可能是选择全职打零工的工人。后者包括前职业骑手或业余骑手,他们无法应对严格监管的专业客运行业的严格限制、高价格的许可证、低效的工作与生活平衡政策以及缺乏安全保障。一部分学者认为,平台为司机提供的条件鼓励了社会各阶层的创业精神,并促进了经济增长的分散化。事实上,按需拼车平台使司机的收入适应市场,提供黄金时段定价以满足不断增长的需求。此外,通过允许灵活的工作时间表,他们被认为促进了工作与生活的平衡。最后,通过整合技术,他们确保提供更高效、更安全的服务,乘客登记、免费乘车和GPS定位是运营的组成部分。然而,绝大多数学者一直严厉批评这些平台服务侵犯了工人的权利。如果学术界几乎一致认为,零工工人选择进入劳动经济,这将在中长期内影响到他们、他们的家庭和其他工作人口,那么问题就来了,监管机构推动这些工人做出(或强加于他们)更有利于他们自己的福利和其他工人体面生活水平的决定是否合理。换句话说,在尊重“零工”在把握进入“零工劳动力市场”的机会方面的自主权和采取家长化措施保护“零工”免受“自我剥削”之间,应该如何平衡?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The AB5 Experiment – Should States Adopt California’s Worker Classification Law? A Note on Antitrust, Labor, and 'No Cold Call' Agreements in Silicon Valley Critical Analysis of Violation of Work Agreement Clause The Economic Basis of the Independent Contractor/Employee Distinction Hierarchies without firms? Vertical disintegration, outsourcing and the nature of the platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1