Hierarchies without firms? Vertical disintegration, outsourcing and the nature of the platform

Antonio Aloisi
{"title":"Hierarchies without firms? Vertical disintegration, outsourcing and the nature of the platform","authors":"Antonio Aloisi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3124389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New forms of labour intermediation through digital platforms such as Uber, Deliveroo or Amazon Mechanical Turk can be conceptualised as the latest stage of a long-lasting process of disaggregation of the firm and “disorganisation of labour law.” In particular, the rise of platform-mediated work can be seen as an instantiation of deliberate business strategies aimed at outsourcing labour while retaining intense and pervasive managerial prerogative. The phenomenon is exacerbating several unresolved tensions inherent in the contemporary world of work, let alone the perverse impact that “platformisation” is having on precariousness and social inequalities.\r\nIn short, new technologies allow platforms to abandon traditional methods of workplace governance and adopt a stronger version of the “command and control” logic. Direct interaction is replaced by a significant reliance on information communications technology: workers are monitored more closely and intimately than they ever used to be by means of tech tools, including algorithms, artificial intelligence and customers’ reviews. This leads to the question whether the existing concept of “firm” is appropriate to face this transformational new reality, whether minor or major adaptations may be necessary or whether we need a total re-invention of the underlying assumptions of the employment relationship.\r\nAfter describing the theoretical antecedents of hierarchical outsourcing, the article explores the literature on the nature of “non-standard forms of firm” by applying transaction-cost economics. In an attempt to update the incomplete trichotomy among “hierarchies,” “markets” and “networks,” I present a complementary model combining pre-existing schemes. By building on theories unfolding the disarticulation of the formal employing entity and the pulverisation of work-related responsibilities, this paper demystifies the prototypical business model of rampant socio-economic actors.","PeriodicalId":292127,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Employment Contract Law (Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Employment Contract Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

New forms of labour intermediation through digital platforms such as Uber, Deliveroo or Amazon Mechanical Turk can be conceptualised as the latest stage of a long-lasting process of disaggregation of the firm and “disorganisation of labour law.” In particular, the rise of platform-mediated work can be seen as an instantiation of deliberate business strategies aimed at outsourcing labour while retaining intense and pervasive managerial prerogative. The phenomenon is exacerbating several unresolved tensions inherent in the contemporary world of work, let alone the perverse impact that “platformisation” is having on precariousness and social inequalities. In short, new technologies allow platforms to abandon traditional methods of workplace governance and adopt a stronger version of the “command and control” logic. Direct interaction is replaced by a significant reliance on information communications technology: workers are monitored more closely and intimately than they ever used to be by means of tech tools, including algorithms, artificial intelligence and customers’ reviews. This leads to the question whether the existing concept of “firm” is appropriate to face this transformational new reality, whether minor or major adaptations may be necessary or whether we need a total re-invention of the underlying assumptions of the employment relationship. After describing the theoretical antecedents of hierarchical outsourcing, the article explores the literature on the nature of “non-standard forms of firm” by applying transaction-cost economics. In an attempt to update the incomplete trichotomy among “hierarchies,” “markets” and “networks,” I present a complementary model combining pre-existing schemes. By building on theories unfolding the disarticulation of the formal employing entity and the pulverisation of work-related responsibilities, this paper demystifies the prototypical business model of rampant socio-economic actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有公司的等级制度?垂直解体,外包和平台的性质
通过Uber、Deliveroo或亚马逊Mechanical Turk等数字平台的新形式的劳动中介,可以被概念化为企业解体和“劳动法解体”这一长期过程的最新阶段。特别是,以平台为中介的工作的兴起可以被视为旨在外包劳动力的深思熟虑的商业战略的一个实例,同时保留强烈和普遍的管理特权。这种现象加剧了当代职场中固有的几个尚未解决的紧张关系,更不用说“平台化”对不稳定性和社会不平等造成的反常影响了。简而言之,新技术允许平台放弃传统的工作场所治理方法,采用更强大的“命令与控制”逻辑。直接的互动被对信息通信技术的严重依赖所取代:通过算法、人工智能和客户评论等技术工具,员工受到比以往任何时候都更密切、更密切的监控。这就引出了这样一个问题:现有的“公司”概念是否适合面对这种转型的新现实,是否需要进行小的或大的调整,或者我们是否需要完全重新发明雇佣关系的基本假设。在描述了分层外包的理论前提之后,本文运用交易成本经济学对“非标准企业形式”本质的文献进行了探讨。为了更新“等级”、“市场”和“网络”之间的不完全三分法,我提出了一个结合已有方案的补充模型。通过建立在揭示正式雇佣实体的解体和与工作相关的责任的粉碎的理论基础上,本文揭开了猖獗的社会经济行为者的典型商业模式的神秘面纱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The AB5 Experiment – Should States Adopt California’s Worker Classification Law? A Note on Antitrust, Labor, and 'No Cold Call' Agreements in Silicon Valley Critical Analysis of Violation of Work Agreement Clause The Economic Basis of the Independent Contractor/Employee Distinction Hierarchies without firms? Vertical disintegration, outsourcing and the nature of the platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1