Factors affecting the severity of rear-end conflicts: a driving simulator study

Tiantian Chen, Lu Bai, N. Sze
{"title":"Factors affecting the severity of rear-end conflicts: a driving simulator study","authors":"Tiantian Chen, Lu Bai, N. Sze","doi":"10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traffic conflict has been adopted as a road safety surrogate measure, especially for specific road entities and road user groups. It is believed that factors affecting the occurrence and severity of traffic conflicts would also affect those of road crashes. In this study, the effects of driver age, traffic condition and driving time on the severity of rear-end conflicts on inner-city roads were examined using driving simulator approach. A total of 41 drivers completed the driving simulator experiment. Their responses to 82 challenging events were assessed. Performance indicators including braking reaction time (BRT), minimum time-to-collision (TTC min), time exposed time-to-collision (TET), time integrated time-to-collision (TIT) and the conflicting speed were considered. A TTC min of 3 seconds or less was adopted as a threshold to screen out 68 rear-end conflicts for subsequent analysis. Results indicated that low traffic flow condition contributed to the reductions in BRT, TIT and TET. Drivers tend to react faster to the challenging event under the low traffic condition. Also, the rear-end conflicts tend to be less severe under the low traffic condition. Elderly drivers were found to have a shorter duration of safety-critical situation during the rear-end conflicts. Driving time has significant influence on BRT, TIT and TET. Driver’s reaction was slower at the last five minutes of the simulated driving. This could be explained by the driver fatigue due to the prolonged driving. However, the adaptive strategy, i.e. speed reduction, in the late period of the 60-minute driving contributed to the lower severity level of conflict. This study should provide useful insights on the traffic conflict analysis, using driving simulator approach.","PeriodicalId":325712,"journal":{"name":"2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS)","volume":"42 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 5th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTIS.2019.8883598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Traffic conflict has been adopted as a road safety surrogate measure, especially for specific road entities and road user groups. It is believed that factors affecting the occurrence and severity of traffic conflicts would also affect those of road crashes. In this study, the effects of driver age, traffic condition and driving time on the severity of rear-end conflicts on inner-city roads were examined using driving simulator approach. A total of 41 drivers completed the driving simulator experiment. Their responses to 82 challenging events were assessed. Performance indicators including braking reaction time (BRT), minimum time-to-collision (TTC min), time exposed time-to-collision (TET), time integrated time-to-collision (TIT) and the conflicting speed were considered. A TTC min of 3 seconds or less was adopted as a threshold to screen out 68 rear-end conflicts for subsequent analysis. Results indicated that low traffic flow condition contributed to the reductions in BRT, TIT and TET. Drivers tend to react faster to the challenging event under the low traffic condition. Also, the rear-end conflicts tend to be less severe under the low traffic condition. Elderly drivers were found to have a shorter duration of safety-critical situation during the rear-end conflicts. Driving time has significant influence on BRT, TIT and TET. Driver’s reaction was slower at the last five minutes of the simulated driving. This could be explained by the driver fatigue due to the prolonged driving. However, the adaptive strategy, i.e. speed reduction, in the late period of the 60-minute driving contributed to the lower severity level of conflict. This study should provide useful insights on the traffic conflict analysis, using driving simulator approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响追尾事故严重程度的因素:驾驶模拟器研究
交通冲突已被作为道路安全的替代措施,特别是针对特定的道路实体和道路用户群体。人们认为,影响交通冲突发生和严重程度的因素也会影响道路交通事故的发生和严重程度。本研究采用驾驶模拟器的方法,研究了驾驶员年龄、交通条件和驾驶时间对城市道路追尾冲突严重程度的影响。共有41名驾驶员完成了驾驶模拟器实验。他们对82个具有挑战性的事件的反应进行了评估。性能指标包括制动反应时间(BRT)、最小碰撞时间(TTC min)、暴露碰撞时间(TET)、时间集成碰撞时间(TIT)和碰撞速度。采用3秒或更短的TTC min作为阈值,以筛选出68个追尾冲突以供后续分析。结果表明,低交通流量导致BRT、TIT和TET的降低。在低流量条件下,驾驶员对具有挑战性的事件往往反应更快。此外,在低流量条件下,追尾冲突的严重程度往往较低。在追尾事故中,老年司机的安全危急状况持续时间较短。驾驶时间对BRT、TIT和TET有显著影响。在模拟驾驶的最后5分钟,驾驶员的反应较慢。这可能是由于长时间驾驶造成的疲劳所致。然而,在60分钟驾驶后期的适应性策略(即减速)有助于降低冲突的严重程度。本研究为交通冲突分析提供了有益的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Speed and Acceleration on Emission Ratio Based on Actual Road Driving: A Case of Xiaodian District in Taiyuan The Moderating Effect of Risk Tolerance on the Hazardous Attitudes and Safety Behavior of Maritime Pilots: a Chinese Case Simulation Analysis of Steering Gear Hydraulic System Fault Mechanism Based on AMESim Analysis and Control of Intelligent Traffic Signal System Based on Adaptive Fuzzy Neural Network A New Level of Service Method for Roads Based on Available Perception Time and Risk of Sustaining Severe Injury or Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1