Socioeconomic Status Impact Hypertensive Risk and Treatment among Older Adults in China

Cuicui Xia, Jianxin Li
{"title":"Socioeconomic Status Impact Hypertensive Risk and Treatment among Older Adults in China","authors":"Cuicui Xia, Jianxin Li","doi":"10.36316/gcatr.01.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypertension has become one of the significant health problems among the elderly. The disparities in the prevalence, awareness, and treatment of hypertension have been associated with socioeconomic status but lack of consistency especially in developing countries where is undergoing epidemiological transition.\nMethods: Data used in this study was drawn from the 2013 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which was designed with a multi-stage clustering population-based sampling. The dependent variables were hypertension as well as self-awareness and treatment of hypertension, both of which were measured as binary outcomes.The independent variables included the community and individual socioeconomic conditions mainly measured by education, income and occupations. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis to considering\nthe clustering at community level.\nResults: Individuals aged 45 years or older living in urban areas (Beta=0.144; p<0.1) and communities with higher mandarin fluency score (Beta=0.043; p<0.05) were positively associated with the risk of hypertension. Compared with agricultural workers, the retired (Beta=0.425; p<0.001), people working for government or institutions (Beta=0.519; p<0.001), working with a large company (Beta=0.362; p<0.05), farmer or working with a small private firm (Beta=0.302; p<0.05) were more likely to be \nhypertensive. We also found that urban living (Beta=0.194; p<0.1) and communities with a higher mandarin fluency score (Beta=0.061; p<0.05) were associated with a higher awareness of hypertension. There was a noted regional variation in both the awareness and treatment of hypertension; people living in the western China were less likely to be aware of (Beta=-0.186; p<0.1) and to manage their hypertension (Beta=-0.297; p<0.05) compared to those in the more developed eastern China. The inequality in treatment was also observed among occupations; the retired (Beta=0.785; p<0.001), individuals working for government or institutions (Beta=0.437; p<0.1) or for a private firm\n(Beta=0.395; p<0.1) were more likely to receive treatment for hypertension.\nConclusion: Occupation, urban dwelling, and living in the more developed eastern China were associated with more likelihood of developing hypertension and being aware of and treated for hypertension. However, income and levels of education, two classical measures of socioeconomic status, were not associated with either of the three outcomeshypertensive risk, awareness and treatment in China.","PeriodicalId":265939,"journal":{"name":"Global Clinical and Translational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Clinical and Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36316/gcatr.01.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Hypertension has become one of the significant health problems among the elderly. The disparities in the prevalence, awareness, and treatment of hypertension have been associated with socioeconomic status but lack of consistency especially in developing countries where is undergoing epidemiological transition. Methods: Data used in this study was drawn from the 2013 wave of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which was designed with a multi-stage clustering population-based sampling. The dependent variables were hypertension as well as self-awareness and treatment of hypertension, both of which were measured as binary outcomes.The independent variables included the community and individual socioeconomic conditions mainly measured by education, income and occupations. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used for statistical analysis to considering the clustering at community level. Results: Individuals aged 45 years or older living in urban areas (Beta=0.144; p<0.1) and communities with higher mandarin fluency score (Beta=0.043; p<0.05) were positively associated with the risk of hypertension. Compared with agricultural workers, the retired (Beta=0.425; p<0.001), people working for government or institutions (Beta=0.519; p<0.001), working with a large company (Beta=0.362; p<0.05), farmer or working with a small private firm (Beta=0.302; p<0.05) were more likely to be hypertensive. We also found that urban living (Beta=0.194; p<0.1) and communities with a higher mandarin fluency score (Beta=0.061; p<0.05) were associated with a higher awareness of hypertension. There was a noted regional variation in both the awareness and treatment of hypertension; people living in the western China were less likely to be aware of (Beta=-0.186; p<0.1) and to manage their hypertension (Beta=-0.297; p<0.05) compared to those in the more developed eastern China. The inequality in treatment was also observed among occupations; the retired (Beta=0.785; p<0.001), individuals working for government or institutions (Beta=0.437; p<0.1) or for a private firm (Beta=0.395; p<0.1) were more likely to receive treatment for hypertension. Conclusion: Occupation, urban dwelling, and living in the more developed eastern China were associated with more likelihood of developing hypertension and being aware of and treated for hypertension. However, income and levels of education, two classical measures of socioeconomic status, were not associated with either of the three outcomeshypertensive risk, awareness and treatment in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会经济地位对中国老年人高血压风险和治疗的影响
背景:高血压已成为老年人重要的健康问题之一。高血压患病率、认识和治疗方面的差异与社会经济地位有关,但缺乏一致性,特别是在正在经历流行病学转型的发展中国家。方法:本研究使用的数据来自2013年中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS),采用多阶段聚类人口抽样设计。因变量为高血压、高血压的自我意识和治疗,两者均以二元结果测量。自变量包括主要由教育、收入和职业衡量的社区和个人社会经济条件。采用层次逻辑回归模型进行统计分析,考虑社区层面的聚类。结果:居住在城市地区的45岁及以上个体(Beta=0.144;p<0.1)和普通话流利度得分较高的社区(Beta=0.043;P <0.05)与高血压发生风险呈正相关。与农业工人相比,退休人员(Beta=0.425;p<0.001),在政府或机构工作的人(Beta=0.519;p<0.001),与大公司合作(Beta=0.362;p<0.05),农民或与小型私营公司合作(Beta=0.302;P <0.05)更容易发生高血压。我们还发现城市生活(Beta=0.194;p<0.1)和普通话流利度得分较高的社区(Beta=0.061;P <0.05)与高血压知晓率增高相关。对高血压的认识和治疗存在明显的地区差异;生活在中国西部的人不太可能意识到(Beta=-0.186;p<0.1)和控制高血压(β =-0.297;p<0.05)。不同职业之间的待遇也不平等;退休人员(Beta=0.785;p<0.001),为政府或机构工作的个人(Beta=0.437;p<0.1)或私营企业(Beta=0.395;P <0.1)更有可能接受高血压治疗。结论:职业、城市居住和生活在中国东部较发达地区的人群患高血压的可能性更高,高血压意识和治疗的可能性也更高。然而,在中国,收入和教育水平(社会经济地位的两个经典衡量标准)与高血压风险、认知和治疗的三个结果均无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel Attention Training in Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Birth Outcomes and IGF2 Methylation in P3 Promoter Region in Tibetan and Han Chinese Maternal-newborn Pairs in Hypo-baric Hypoxia High-altitude Area Pharmacovigilance Principles: The Building Blocks of Benefit-Risk Assessments Structured Benefit-Risk Assessments: An Illustrative Case Study of Paracetamol. Metformin Combined LMWH Intervention in 25 Pregnant Women with History of Hyperlipidemia Pancreatitis in Pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1