Computational Interpretation of Recency for the Choice of Referring Expressions in Discourse

F. Same, Kees van Deemter
{"title":"Computational Interpretation of Recency for the Choice of Referring Expressions in Discourse","authors":"F. Same, Kees van Deemter","doi":"10.18653/v1/2020.codi-1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First, we discuss the most common linguistic perspectives on the concept of recency and propose a taxonomy of recency metrics employed in Machine Learning studies for choosing the form of referring expressions in discourse context. We then report on a Multi-Layer Perceptron study and a Sequential Forward Search experiment, followed by Bayes Factor analysis of the outcomes. The results suggest that recency metrics counting paragraphs and sentences contribute to referential choice prediction more than other recency-related metrics. Based on the results of our analysis, we argue that, sensitivity to discourse structure is important for recency metrics used in determining referring expression forms.","PeriodicalId":332037,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.codi-1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

First, we discuss the most common linguistic perspectives on the concept of recency and propose a taxonomy of recency metrics employed in Machine Learning studies for choosing the form of referring expressions in discourse context. We then report on a Multi-Layer Perceptron study and a Sequential Forward Search experiment, followed by Bayes Factor analysis of the outcomes. The results suggest that recency metrics counting paragraphs and sentences contribute to referential choice prediction more than other recency-related metrics. Based on the results of our analysis, we argue that, sensitivity to discourse structure is important for recency metrics used in determining referring expression forms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语篇中指称表达选择的近因性计算解释
首先,我们讨论了关于近因概念的最常见的语言学观点,并提出了机器学习研究中用于选择话语语境中引用表达形式的近因度量的分类。然后,我们报告了多层感知器研究和顺序前向搜索实验,然后对结果进行贝叶斯因子分析。结果表明,计算段落和句子的近因度量比其他近因相关度量更有助于参考选择预测。基于我们的分析结果,我们认为,对话语结构的敏感性对于用于确定引用表达形式的近因度量是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Do sentence embeddings capture discourse properties of sentences from Scientific Abstracts ? Contextualized Embeddings for Connective Disambiguation in Shallow Discourse Parsing Joint Modeling of Arguments for Event Understanding Coreference for Discourse Parsing: A Neural Approach Computational Interpretation of Recency for the Choice of Referring Expressions in Discourse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1