Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Quantitative Analysis of Timed Up and Go (TUG)

Mahmoud Seifallahi, J. Galvin, B. Ghoraani
{"title":"Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Quantitative Analysis of Timed Up and Go (TUG)","authors":"Mahmoud Seifallahi, J. Galvin, B. Ghoraani","doi":"10.1109/ICDMW58026.2022.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mild cognitive impairment (MCl) is abnormal cognitive decline beyond expected normal decline. The rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) in people with MCl is an estimated 80% in 6 years. However, identifying MCI from normal cognition in older adults remains a clinical challenge in early AD detection. We investigated a new method for detecting MCI based on patients' gait and balance. Our approach performs a comprehensive analysis of the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), based on the first application of a Kinect v.2 camera to record and provide movement measures and machine learning to differentiate between the two groups of older adults with MCI and healthy controls (HC). We collected movement data from 25 joints of the body via a Kinect v.2 camera as 30 HC and 25 MCI subjects performed TUG. The collected data provided a comprehensive list of gait and balance measures with 61 features, including duration of TUG, duration and velocity of transition phases, and micro and macro gait features. Our analysis evidenced that 25 features were significantly different between MCI and HC subjects, where 20 of them were unique features as indicated by our correlation analysis. The classification results using three different classifiers of support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and artificial neural network showed that the ability of our approach for detecting MCI subjects with the highest performance was using SVM with 94% accuracy, 100 % precision, 93.33% F-score, and 0.94 AUC. These observations suggest the possibility of our approach as a low-cost, easy-to-use MCI screening tool for objectively detecting subjects at high risk of developing AD. Such a tool is well-suited for widespread application in clinical settings and nursing homes to detect early signs of cognitive impairment and promote healthy aging.","PeriodicalId":146687,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW58026.2022.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCl) is abnormal cognitive decline beyond expected normal decline. The rate of progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) in people with MCl is an estimated 80% in 6 years. However, identifying MCI from normal cognition in older adults remains a clinical challenge in early AD detection. We investigated a new method for detecting MCI based on patients' gait and balance. Our approach performs a comprehensive analysis of the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), based on the first application of a Kinect v.2 camera to record and provide movement measures and machine learning to differentiate between the two groups of older adults with MCI and healthy controls (HC). We collected movement data from 25 joints of the body via a Kinect v.2 camera as 30 HC and 25 MCI subjects performed TUG. The collected data provided a comprehensive list of gait and balance measures with 61 features, including duration of TUG, duration and velocity of transition phases, and micro and macro gait features. Our analysis evidenced that 25 features were significantly different between MCI and HC subjects, where 20 of them were unique features as indicated by our correlation analysis. The classification results using three different classifiers of support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and artificial neural network showed that the ability of our approach for detecting MCI subjects with the highest performance was using SVM with 94% accuracy, 100 % precision, 93.33% F-score, and 0.94 AUC. These observations suggest the possibility of our approach as a low-cost, easy-to-use MCI screening tool for objectively detecting subjects at high risk of developing AD. Such a tool is well-suited for widespread application in clinical settings and nursing homes to detect early signs of cognitive impairment and promote healthy aging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从计时起走(Timed Up and Go, TUG)定量分析检测轻度认知障碍
轻度认知障碍(Mild cognitive impairment, MCl)是指超出预期的正常认知能力下降。MCl患者在6年内发展为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的比率估计为80%。然而,从老年人的正常认知中识别MCI仍然是早期AD检测的临床挑战。我们研究了一种基于患者步态和平衡的MCI检测新方法。我们的方法对Timed Up and Go测试(TUG)进行了全面的分析,基于Kinect v.2摄像头的首次应用,该摄像头记录并提供运动测量和机器学习,以区分两组患有轻度认知障碍和健康对照(HC)的老年人。当30名HC和25名MCI受试者进行TUG时,我们通过Kinect v.2摄像头收集了身体25个关节的运动数据。收集的数据提供了61个特征的步态和平衡测量的综合列表,包括TUG的持续时间,过渡阶段的持续时间和速度,以及微观和宏观的步态特征。我们的分析表明,有25个特征在MCI和HC受试者之间存在显著差异,其中20个特征是我们的相关分析所显示的独特特征。使用支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(random forest)和人工神经网络(artificial neural network)三种不同分类器对MCI受试者进行分类的结果表明,使用SVM检测MCI受试者的准确率为94%,精密度为100%,f分数为93.33%,AUC为0.94。这些观察结果表明,我们的方法有可能作为一种低成本、易于使用的MCI筛查工具,客观地检测患AD的高风险受试者。这种工具非常适合广泛应用于临床环境和养老院,以发现认知障碍的早期迹象,促进健康老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Above Ground Biomass Estimation of a Cocoa Plantation using Machine Learning Backdoor Poisoning of Encrypted Traffic Classifiers Identifying Patterns of Vulnerability Incidence in Foundational Machine Learning Repositories on GitHub: An Unsupervised Graph Embedding Approach Data-driven Kernel Subspace Clustering with Local Manifold Preservation Persona-Based Conversational AI: State of the Art and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1