Does mislabeling COVID-19 elicit the perception of threat and reduce blame?

Chengxin Xu, Yixin Liu
{"title":"Does mislabeling COVID-19 elicit the perception of threat and reduce blame?","authors":"Chengxin Xu, Yixin Liu","doi":"10.30636/JBPA.42.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Associating a life-threatening crisis with a geographic locality can stigmatize people from that area. However, such a strategy may reduce the public blame attributed to the government because the perceived foreign threat establishes a scapegoat, which transfers that blame. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigated whether the “Chinese Virus” label placed on COVID-19 has elicited opposition to Chinese immigrants and reduced public blame attributed to the federal government. We used a survey experiment during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a list experiment to measure perceived threat. The descriptive analysis suggested a negative attitude toward Chinese immigrants overall, in which conservatives expressed stronger negative attitudes than did liberals and moderates. While labelling COVID-19 as the “Chinese Virus” did not make a difference overall, our exploratory results shows that it led to a significant increase in liberals’ perception that Chinese immigrants are a threat. However, the “Chinese Virus” label showed no effect overall in reducing the extent to which either liberals or conservatives’ attributed blame to the federal government.","PeriodicalId":407938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30636/JBPA.42.225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Associating a life-threatening crisis with a geographic locality can stigmatize people from that area. However, such a strategy may reduce the public blame attributed to the government because the perceived foreign threat establishes a scapegoat, which transfers that blame. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigated whether the “Chinese Virus” label placed on COVID-19 has elicited opposition to Chinese immigrants and reduced public blame attributed to the federal government. We used a survey experiment during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a list experiment to measure perceived threat. The descriptive analysis suggested a negative attitude toward Chinese immigrants overall, in which conservatives expressed stronger negative attitudes than did liberals and moderates. While labelling COVID-19 as the “Chinese Virus” did not make a difference overall, our exploratory results shows that it led to a significant increase in liberals’ perception that Chinese immigrants are a threat. However, the “Chinese Virus” label showed no effect overall in reducing the extent to which either liberals or conservatives’ attributed blame to the federal government.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
错误标记COVID-19是否会引发威胁的感知并减少指责?
将危及生命的危机与地理位置联系在一起可能会使该地区的人蒙受耻辱。然而,这种策略可能会减少公众对政府的指责,因为感知到的外国威胁建立了一个替罪羊,从而转移了指责。在COVID-19大流行的背景下,我们调查了COVID-19的“中国病毒”标签是否引起了对中国移民的反对,并减少了公众对联邦政府的指责。我们使用了COVID-19大流行期间的调查实验和列表实验来测量感知威胁。描述性分析表明,总体上对中国移民持消极态度,其中保守派比自由派和温和派表现出更强烈的消极态度。虽然将COVID-19标记为“中国病毒”总体上没有产生影响,但我们的探索性结果显示,这导致自由主义者认为中国移民是威胁的看法显著增加。然而,“中国病毒”的标签在减少自由派或保守派将责任归咎于联邦政府的程度方面没有显示出总体效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bringing “Behavioral” Fully into Behavioral Public Administration Administrative Informatics Simon’s Behavior and Waldo’s Public Revisiting Our Assumptions About the Nature of Man Ambiguous COVID-19 Messaging Increases Unsafe Socializing Intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1