The United States Climate Change Policies and COVID-19: Poisoning the Cure

Carolina Arlota
{"title":"The United States Climate Change Policies and COVID-19: Poisoning the Cure","authors":"Carolina Arlota","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3896009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change is complex during the best of times. It is commonly conceptualized as the quintessential global collective action problem: it affects those who do not contribute to it while the benefits of climate change mitigation measures are not restricted to those who pursue such measures. This conceptualization illustrates the high transaction costs involved in domestic policies as well as in international agreements addressing climate change, and it is of academic and practical interest. As such, this article discusses the current challenges that climate change policies face, focusing on the linkages between the climate change policies of the Trump administration and the COVID-19 pandemic and on the effects of those linkages, both in the United States and globally. Specifically, this article addresses the Trump administration’s attacks on climate science and its deregulatory climate agenda as well as the United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. In addition, it discusses principles of international law and the challenges related to state liability for environmental harms in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. This article also assesses how the United States’ climate policies are likely to aggravate inequalities domestically as well as globally in the aftermath of the pandemic. This article offers several original contributions. First, it provides an unique assessment of how the deregulatory climate policies implemented nationally and internationally by the Trump administration have magnified the COVID-19 crisis. Second, the law and economics methodology used in this article validates the claim that improving environmental quality is connected to optimizing early regulatory action. Third, this article discusses the challenges of state liability for climate harms in the aftermath of the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and concurrent COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, this article offers relevant insights for the literature on climate change that are likely to be applicable to critical future situations, whether they are health-related, global economic crisis, or climate-related emergencies. Ultimately, this article concludes that, in aggregate, all such climate change policies have contributed to increased pollution, including elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that have aggravated pre-pandemic inequalities embedded within the United States and among countries. Consequently, the domestic and international policy choices of the Trump administration are worsening the impact of the pandemic, particularly for those in more vulnerable positions, as well as indelibly poisoning the global commons.","PeriodicalId":161847,"journal":{"name":"University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3896009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is complex during the best of times. It is commonly conceptualized as the quintessential global collective action problem: it affects those who do not contribute to it while the benefits of climate change mitigation measures are not restricted to those who pursue such measures. This conceptualization illustrates the high transaction costs involved in domestic policies as well as in international agreements addressing climate change, and it is of academic and practical interest. As such, this article discusses the current challenges that climate change policies face, focusing on the linkages between the climate change policies of the Trump administration and the COVID-19 pandemic and on the effects of those linkages, both in the United States and globally. Specifically, this article addresses the Trump administration’s attacks on climate science and its deregulatory climate agenda as well as the United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. In addition, it discusses principles of international law and the challenges related to state liability for environmental harms in the context of the COVID-19 crisis. This article also assesses how the United States’ climate policies are likely to aggravate inequalities domestically as well as globally in the aftermath of the pandemic. This article offers several original contributions. First, it provides an unique assessment of how the deregulatory climate policies implemented nationally and internationally by the Trump administration have magnified the COVID-19 crisis. Second, the law and economics methodology used in this article validates the claim that improving environmental quality is connected to optimizing early regulatory action. Third, this article discusses the challenges of state liability for climate harms in the aftermath of the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and concurrent COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, this article offers relevant insights for the literature on climate change that are likely to be applicable to critical future situations, whether they are health-related, global economic crisis, or climate-related emergencies. Ultimately, this article concludes that, in aggregate, all such climate change policies have contributed to increased pollution, including elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that have aggravated pre-pandemic inequalities embedded within the United States and among countries. Consequently, the domestic and international policy choices of the Trump administration are worsening the impact of the pandemic, particularly for those in more vulnerable positions, as well as indelibly poisoning the global commons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国气候变化政策和COVID-19:毒化治疗
在最好的时候,气候变化也是复杂的。它通常被定义为典型的全球集体行动问题:它影响到那些没有为其作出贡献的人,而减缓气候变化措施的好处并不局限于采取这些措施的人。这一概念说明了国内政策以及应对气候变化的国际协议所涉及的高交易成本,具有学术和实践意义。因此,本文讨论了当前气候变化政策面临的挑战,重点关注特朗普政府的气候变化政策与COVID-19大流行之间的联系,以及这些联系在美国和全球的影响。具体来说,本文讨论了特朗普政府对气候科学的攻击及其放松监管的气候议程,以及美国退出《巴黎气候变化协定》。此外,报告还讨论了在2019冠状病毒病危机背景下的国际法原则以及与国家环境损害责任相关的挑战。本文还评估了疫情过后,美国的气候政策如何可能加剧国内和全球的不平等。本文提供了一些原创贡献。首先,它对特朗普政府在国内和国际上实施的放松监管的气候政策如何放大了COVID-19危机进行了独特的评估。其次,本文使用的法律和经济学方法验证了改善环境质量与优化早期监管行动有关的说法。第三,本文讨论了在美国退出《巴黎协定》和同时发生的COVID-19大流行之后,国家对气候危害承担责任的挑战。最后,本文为气候变化的文献提供了相关的见解,这些见解可能适用于未来的关键情况,无论是与健康有关的,全球经济危机还是与气候有关的紧急情况。最后,本文的结论是,总的来说,所有这些气候变化政策都导致了污染的增加,包括温室气体(GHG)排放量的增加,这加剧了美国内部和各国之间在大流行前的不平等。因此,特朗普政府的国内和国际政策选择正在加剧这一流行病的影响,特别是对那些处于较弱势地位的人的影响,同时也在不可磨灭地毒害全球公域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Banking Union’s Accountability System in Practice. A Health Check-Up to Europe’s Financial Heart The United States Climate Change Policies and COVID-19: Poisoning the Cure A Regulatory Classification of Digital Assets: Toward an Operational Howey Test for Cryptocurrencies, ICOs, and Other Digital Assets The Case Against Passive Shareholder Voting Patenting Medical Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1