MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA

Carla E. Humud
{"title":"MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA","authors":"Carla E. Humud","doi":"10.4337/9781788112932.00020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After more than a decade of combating Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the United States now faces an increasingly diverse threat from Al Qaeda affiliates in the Middle East and Africa and from emerging groups that have adopted aspects of Al Qaeda's ideology but operate relatively or completely autonomously from the group's senior leadership. U.S. counterterrorism debates have focused on \" formal \" Al Qaeda affiliates, and policymakers increasingly are considering options for addressing the range of threats posed by the wider spectrum of groups inspired by—or similar in goals and aspirations to—Al Qaeda. An additional challenge is the fluid nature of the threat, given the apparent fragmentation of Al Qaeda, and Ayman al Zawahiri's struggle to assert leadership of the group in light of challengers such as Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. Finally, concerns regarding these issues might shape ongoing reevaluations of the federal statutes that underpin current U.S. counterterrorism policy, including the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF, P.L. 107-40). In addition to the AUMF, Congress has addressed the emergence of Al Qaeda affiliates through a number of channels, including oversight of executive branch counterterrorism policies and practices; authorization and appropriations of U.S. funds for counterterrorism operations; and assistance for partner nations engaged in such operations. Note: In addition to focusing on Al Qaeda affiliates, or groups that have publicly sworn allegiance to Al Qaeda leadership and been formally accepted as affiliates, this report also profiles a selection of other groups such as the Islamic State (formerly known as ISIL or ISIS) and Boko Haram.","PeriodicalId":244394,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on the Politics of Small States","volume":"455 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on the Politics of Small States","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112932.00020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

After more than a decade of combating Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the United States now faces an increasingly diverse threat from Al Qaeda affiliates in the Middle East and Africa and from emerging groups that have adopted aspects of Al Qaeda's ideology but operate relatively or completely autonomously from the group's senior leadership. U.S. counterterrorism debates have focused on " formal " Al Qaeda affiliates, and policymakers increasingly are considering options for addressing the range of threats posed by the wider spectrum of groups inspired by—or similar in goals and aspirations to—Al Qaeda. An additional challenge is the fluid nature of the threat, given the apparent fragmentation of Al Qaeda, and Ayman al Zawahiri's struggle to assert leadership of the group in light of challengers such as Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi. Finally, concerns regarding these issues might shape ongoing reevaluations of the federal statutes that underpin current U.S. counterterrorism policy, including the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF, P.L. 107-40). In addition to the AUMF, Congress has addressed the emergence of Al Qaeda affiliates through a number of channels, including oversight of executive branch counterterrorism policies and practices; authorization and appropriations of U.S. funds for counterterrorism operations; and assistance for partner nations engaged in such operations. Note: In addition to focusing on Al Qaeda affiliates, or groups that have publicly sworn allegiance to Al Qaeda leadership and been formally accepted as affiliates, this report also profiles a selection of other groups such as the Islamic State (formerly known as ISIL or ISIS) and Boko Haram.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中东和非洲
在与阿富汗和巴基斯坦的基地组织作战十多年后,美国现在面临着日益多样化的威胁,这些威胁来自基地组织在中东和非洲的分支机构,以及新兴组织,这些组织采用了基地组织意识形态的某些方面,但相对或完全独立于该组织的高级领导层。美国的反恐辩论集中在“正式的”基地组织分支上,政策制定者越来越多地考虑解决受基地组织启发或在目标和抱负上与基地组织相似的更广泛的团体所构成的一系列威胁。另一个挑战是威胁的流动性,考虑到基地组织的明显分裂,以及艾曼·扎瓦希里在伊斯兰国领导人阿布·巴克尔·巴格达迪等挑战者面前难以确立该组织的领导权。最后,对这些问题的关注可能会影响对支持当前美国反恐政策的联邦法规的重新评估,包括2001年使用军事力量的授权(AUMF, P.L. 107-40)。除AUMF外,国会还通过多种渠道应对基地组织附属机构的出现,包括监督行政部门的反恐政策和做法;美国反恐行动资金的授权和拨款;并为参与此类行动的伙伴国提供援助。注:除了关注基地组织附属组织,或公开宣誓效忠基地组织领导层并被正式接受为附属组织的组织外,本报告还介绍了一些其他组织,如伊斯兰国(以前称为ISIL或ISIS)和博科圣地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Small states: public management and policy-making ASIA AND THE PACIFIC CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN INTRODUCING SMALL STATES MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1