The Relationship Between Pricing Policies and Measures of the Economic Independence of Rating Agencies: Evidence from Fitch, Moody's and S&P

Lucia Gibilaro, G. Mattarocci
{"title":"The Relationship Between Pricing Policies and Measures of the Economic Independence of Rating Agencies: Evidence from Fitch, Moody's and S&P","authors":"Lucia Gibilaro, G. Mattarocci","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1452822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rating agencies normally apply an issuer-pay model, which is acknowledged as a possible source of collusion risk. In order to control this risk, raters are requested to monitor only the yearly top customers’ revenues, without considering the value of multi-period relationships.Looking at Fitch, Moody’s and S&P customers for the time horizon 1999–2008, this paper evaluates the sensitivity of different concentration measures to the pricing policy adopted, highlighting the greater fitness of more comprehensive measures. The results also show that a multi-period horizon is less sensitive to changes in the discounting policy and more suitable for regulatory purposes.","PeriodicalId":326490,"journal":{"name":"ACCEPTED PAPERS","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACCEPTED PAPERS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1452822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rating agencies normally apply an issuer-pay model, which is acknowledged as a possible source of collusion risk. In order to control this risk, raters are requested to monitor only the yearly top customers’ revenues, without considering the value of multi-period relationships.Looking at Fitch, Moody’s and S&P customers for the time horizon 1999–2008, this paper evaluates the sensitivity of different concentration measures to the pricing policy adopted, highlighting the greater fitness of more comprehensive measures. The results also show that a multi-period horizon is less sensitive to changes in the discounting policy and more suitable for regulatory purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定价政策与评级机构经济独立性的关系:来自惠誉、穆迪和标准普尔的证据
评级机构通常采用发行者付费模式,这被认为是合谋风险的可能来源。为了控制这种风险,评级员被要求只监控年度顶级客户的收入,而不考虑多期关系的价值。以惠誉、穆迪和标准普尔1999-2008年的客户为研究对象,本文评估了不同集中度措施对所采用定价政策的敏感性,强调了更全面的措施更适合。结果还表明,多期视界对贴现政策的变化不太敏感,更适合于监管目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time Variation in Asset Return Dependence: Strength or Structure? Discount or Premium? Diversification, Firm Value, and Capital Budgeting Efficiency The Relationship Between Pricing Policies and Measures of the Economic Independence of Rating Agencies: Evidence from Fitch, Moody's and S&P Prudential Supervision, Banking and Economic Progress: Implementation of Risk Management Procedures in Joint Stock Banks in Vietnam The Privatisation Experience in Banking and Insurance in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1